Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) covid-19 vaccines during the booster programme in England. DESIGN: Matched cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial. SETTING: Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36921925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072808 |
_version_ | 1784907044314152960 |
---|---|
author | Hulme, William J Horne, Elsie M F Parker, Edward P K Keogh, Ruth H Williamson, Elizabeth J Walker, Venexia Palmer, Tom M Curtis, Helen J Walker, Alex J Andrews, Colm D Mehrkar, Amir Morley, Jessica MacKenna, Brian Bacon, Sebastian C J Goldacre, Ben Hernán, Miguel A Sterne, Jonathan A C |
author_facet | Hulme, William J Horne, Elsie M F Parker, Edward P K Keogh, Ruth H Williamson, Elizabeth J Walker, Venexia Palmer, Tom M Curtis, Helen J Walker, Alex J Andrews, Colm D Mehrkar, Amir Morley, Jessica MacKenna, Brian Bacon, Sebastian C J Goldacre, Ben Hernán, Miguel A Sterne, Jonathan A C |
author_sort | Hulme, William J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) covid-19 vaccines during the booster programme in England. DESIGN: Matched cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial. SETTING: Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants were dominant. PARTICIPANTS: 3 237 918 adults who received a booster dose of either vaccine between 29 October 2021 and 25 February 2022 as part of the national booster programme in England and who received a primary course of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. INTERVENTION: Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 as a booster vaccine dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, covid-19 related hospital admission, covid-19 related death, and non-covid-19 related death at 20 weeks after receipt of the booster dose. RESULTS: 1 618 959 people were matched in each vaccine group, contributing a total 64 546 391 person weeks of follow-up. The 20 week risks per 1000 for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were 164.2 (95% confidence interval 163.3 to 165.1) for BNT162b2 and 159.9 (159.0 to 160.8) for mRNA-1273; the hazard ratio comparing mRNA-1273 with BNT162b2 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 0.96). The 20 week risks per 1000 for hospital admission with covid-19 were 0.75 (0.71 to 0.79) for BNT162b2 and 0.65 (0.61 to 0.69) for mRNA-1273; the hazard ratio was 0.89 (0.82 to 0.95). Covid-19 related deaths were rare: the 20 week risks per 1000 were 0.028 (0.021 to 0.037) for BNT162b2 and 0.024 (0.018 to 0.033) for mRNA-1273; hazard ratio 0.83 (0.58 to 1.19). Comparative effectiveness was generally similar within subgroups defined by the primary course vaccine brand, age, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clinical vulnerability. Relative benefit was similar when vaccines were compared separately in the delta and omicron variant eras. CONCLUSIONS: This matched observational study of adults estimated a modest benefit of booster vaccination with mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2 in preventing positive SARS-CoV-2 tests and hospital admission with covid-19 20 weeks after vaccination, during a period of delta followed by omicron variant dominance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10014664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100146642023-03-16 Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP Hulme, William J Horne, Elsie M F Parker, Edward P K Keogh, Ruth H Williamson, Elizabeth J Walker, Venexia Palmer, Tom M Curtis, Helen J Walker, Alex J Andrews, Colm D Mehrkar, Amir Morley, Jessica MacKenna, Brian Bacon, Sebastian C J Goldacre, Ben Hernán, Miguel A Sterne, Jonathan A C BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) covid-19 vaccines during the booster programme in England. DESIGN: Matched cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial. SETTING: Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants were dominant. PARTICIPANTS: 3 237 918 adults who received a booster dose of either vaccine between 29 October 2021 and 25 February 2022 as part of the national booster programme in England and who received a primary course of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. INTERVENTION: Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 as a booster vaccine dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, covid-19 related hospital admission, covid-19 related death, and non-covid-19 related death at 20 weeks after receipt of the booster dose. RESULTS: 1 618 959 people were matched in each vaccine group, contributing a total 64 546 391 person weeks of follow-up. The 20 week risks per 1000 for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were 164.2 (95% confidence interval 163.3 to 165.1) for BNT162b2 and 159.9 (159.0 to 160.8) for mRNA-1273; the hazard ratio comparing mRNA-1273 with BNT162b2 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 0.96). The 20 week risks per 1000 for hospital admission with covid-19 were 0.75 (0.71 to 0.79) for BNT162b2 and 0.65 (0.61 to 0.69) for mRNA-1273; the hazard ratio was 0.89 (0.82 to 0.95). Covid-19 related deaths were rare: the 20 week risks per 1000 were 0.028 (0.021 to 0.037) for BNT162b2 and 0.024 (0.018 to 0.033) for mRNA-1273; hazard ratio 0.83 (0.58 to 1.19). Comparative effectiveness was generally similar within subgroups defined by the primary course vaccine brand, age, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clinical vulnerability. Relative benefit was similar when vaccines were compared separately in the delta and omicron variant eras. CONCLUSIONS: This matched observational study of adults estimated a modest benefit of booster vaccination with mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2 in preventing positive SARS-CoV-2 tests and hospital admission with covid-19 20 weeks after vaccination, during a period of delta followed by omicron variant dominance. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10014664/ /pubmed/36921925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072808 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Hulme, William J Horne, Elsie M F Parker, Edward P K Keogh, Ruth H Williamson, Elizabeth J Walker, Venexia Palmer, Tom M Curtis, Helen J Walker, Alex J Andrews, Colm D Mehrkar, Amir Morley, Jessica MacKenna, Brian Bacon, Sebastian C J Goldacre, Ben Hernán, Miguel A Sterne, Jonathan A C Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP |
title | Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of bnt162b2 versus mrna-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in england: matched cohort study in opensafely-tpp |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36921925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hulmewilliamj comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT horneelsiemf comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT parkeredwardpk comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT keoghruthh comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT williamsonelizabethj comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT walkervenexia comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT palmertomm comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT curtishelenj comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT walkeralexj comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT andrewscolmd comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT mehrkaramir comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT morleyjessica comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT mackennabrian comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT baconsebastiancj comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT goldacreben comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT hernanmiguela comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp AT sternejonathanac comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2versusmrna1273covid19vaccineboostinginenglandmatchedcohortstudyinopensafelytpp |