Cargando…

Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking

PURPOSE: Orthopaedic scores are essential for the clinical assessment of movement disorders but require an experienced clinician for the manual scoring. Wearable systems are taking root in the medical field and offer a possibility for the convenient collection of motion tracking data. The purpose of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raab, Dominik, Heitzer, Falko, Liaw, Jin Cheng, Müller, Katharina, Weber, Lina, Flores, Francisco Geu, Kecskeméthy, Andrés, Mayer, Constantin, Jäger, Marcus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05670-0
_version_ 1784907080384118784
author Raab, Dominik
Heitzer, Falko
Liaw, Jin Cheng
Müller, Katharina
Weber, Lina
Flores, Francisco Geu
Kecskeméthy, Andrés
Mayer, Constantin
Jäger, Marcus
author_facet Raab, Dominik
Heitzer, Falko
Liaw, Jin Cheng
Müller, Katharina
Weber, Lina
Flores, Francisco Geu
Kecskeméthy, Andrés
Mayer, Constantin
Jäger, Marcus
author_sort Raab, Dominik
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Orthopaedic scores are essential for the clinical assessment of movement disorders but require an experienced clinician for the manual scoring. Wearable systems are taking root in the medical field and offer a possibility for the convenient collection of motion tracking data. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of automated orthopaedic scorings based on motion tracking data using the Harris Hip Score and the Knee Society Score as examples. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients received a clinical examination and an instrumental gait analysis after hip or knee arthroplasty. Seven hundred forty-four gait features were extracted from each patient’s representative gait cycle. For each score, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted with a subsequent tenfold cross-validation. A data split of 70%/30% was applied for training/testing. RESULTS: Both scores can be reproduced with excellent coefficients of determination R(2) for training, testing and cross-validation by applying regression models based on four to six features from instrumental gait analysis as well as the patient-reported parameter ‘pain’ as an offset factor. CONCLUSION: Computing established orthopaedic scores based on motion tracking data yields an automated evaluation of a joint function at the hip and knee which is suitable for direct clinical interpretation. In combination with novel technologies for wearable data collection, these computations can support healthcare staff with objective and telemedical applicable scorings for a large number of patients without the need for trained clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10014817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100148172023-03-16 Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking Raab, Dominik Heitzer, Falko Liaw, Jin Cheng Müller, Katharina Weber, Lina Flores, Francisco Geu Kecskeméthy, Andrés Mayer, Constantin Jäger, Marcus Int Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: Orthopaedic scores are essential for the clinical assessment of movement disorders but require an experienced clinician for the manual scoring. Wearable systems are taking root in the medical field and offer a possibility for the convenient collection of motion tracking data. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of automated orthopaedic scorings based on motion tracking data using the Harris Hip Score and the Knee Society Score as examples. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients received a clinical examination and an instrumental gait analysis after hip or knee arthroplasty. Seven hundred forty-four gait features were extracted from each patient’s representative gait cycle. For each score, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted with a subsequent tenfold cross-validation. A data split of 70%/30% was applied for training/testing. RESULTS: Both scores can be reproduced with excellent coefficients of determination R(2) for training, testing and cross-validation by applying regression models based on four to six features from instrumental gait analysis as well as the patient-reported parameter ‘pain’ as an offset factor. CONCLUSION: Computing established orthopaedic scores based on motion tracking data yields an automated evaluation of a joint function at the hip and knee which is suitable for direct clinical interpretation. In combination with novel technologies for wearable data collection, these computations can support healthcare staff with objective and telemedical applicable scorings for a large number of patients without the need for trained clinicians. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-10 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10014817/ /pubmed/36624129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05670-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Raab, Dominik
Heitzer, Falko
Liaw, Jin Cheng
Müller, Katharina
Weber, Lina
Flores, Francisco Geu
Kecskeméthy, Andrés
Mayer, Constantin
Jäger, Marcus
Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking
title Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking
title_full Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking
title_fullStr Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking
title_full_unstemmed Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking
title_short Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking
title_sort do we still need to screen our patients?—orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05670-0
work_keys_str_mv AT raabdominik dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking
AT heitzerfalko dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking
AT liawjincheng dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking
AT mullerkatharina dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking
AT weberlina dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking
AT floresfranciscogeu dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking
AT kecskemethyandres dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking
AT mayerconstantin dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking
AT jagermarcus dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking