Cargando…
Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking
PURPOSE: Orthopaedic scores are essential for the clinical assessment of movement disorders but require an experienced clinician for the manual scoring. Wearable systems are taking root in the medical field and offer a possibility for the convenient collection of motion tracking data. The purpose of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05670-0 |
_version_ | 1784907080384118784 |
---|---|
author | Raab, Dominik Heitzer, Falko Liaw, Jin Cheng Müller, Katharina Weber, Lina Flores, Francisco Geu Kecskeméthy, Andrés Mayer, Constantin Jäger, Marcus |
author_facet | Raab, Dominik Heitzer, Falko Liaw, Jin Cheng Müller, Katharina Weber, Lina Flores, Francisco Geu Kecskeméthy, Andrés Mayer, Constantin Jäger, Marcus |
author_sort | Raab, Dominik |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Orthopaedic scores are essential for the clinical assessment of movement disorders but require an experienced clinician for the manual scoring. Wearable systems are taking root in the medical field and offer a possibility for the convenient collection of motion tracking data. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of automated orthopaedic scorings based on motion tracking data using the Harris Hip Score and the Knee Society Score as examples. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients received a clinical examination and an instrumental gait analysis after hip or knee arthroplasty. Seven hundred forty-four gait features were extracted from each patient’s representative gait cycle. For each score, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted with a subsequent tenfold cross-validation. A data split of 70%/30% was applied for training/testing. RESULTS: Both scores can be reproduced with excellent coefficients of determination R(2) for training, testing and cross-validation by applying regression models based on four to six features from instrumental gait analysis as well as the patient-reported parameter ‘pain’ as an offset factor. CONCLUSION: Computing established orthopaedic scores based on motion tracking data yields an automated evaluation of a joint function at the hip and knee which is suitable for direct clinical interpretation. In combination with novel technologies for wearable data collection, these computations can support healthcare staff with objective and telemedical applicable scorings for a large number of patients without the need for trained clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10014817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100148172023-03-16 Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking Raab, Dominik Heitzer, Falko Liaw, Jin Cheng Müller, Katharina Weber, Lina Flores, Francisco Geu Kecskeméthy, Andrés Mayer, Constantin Jäger, Marcus Int Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: Orthopaedic scores are essential for the clinical assessment of movement disorders but require an experienced clinician for the manual scoring. Wearable systems are taking root in the medical field and offer a possibility for the convenient collection of motion tracking data. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of automated orthopaedic scorings based on motion tracking data using the Harris Hip Score and the Knee Society Score as examples. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients received a clinical examination and an instrumental gait analysis after hip or knee arthroplasty. Seven hundred forty-four gait features were extracted from each patient’s representative gait cycle. For each score, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted with a subsequent tenfold cross-validation. A data split of 70%/30% was applied for training/testing. RESULTS: Both scores can be reproduced with excellent coefficients of determination R(2) for training, testing and cross-validation by applying regression models based on four to six features from instrumental gait analysis as well as the patient-reported parameter ‘pain’ as an offset factor. CONCLUSION: Computing established orthopaedic scores based on motion tracking data yields an automated evaluation of a joint function at the hip and knee which is suitable for direct clinical interpretation. In combination with novel technologies for wearable data collection, these computations can support healthcare staff with objective and telemedical applicable scorings for a large number of patients without the need for trained clinicians. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-10 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10014817/ /pubmed/36624129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05670-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Raab, Dominik Heitzer, Falko Liaw, Jin Cheng Müller, Katharina Weber, Lina Flores, Francisco Geu Kecskeméthy, Andrés Mayer, Constantin Jäger, Marcus Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking |
title | Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking |
title_full | Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking |
title_fullStr | Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking |
title_short | Do we still need to screen our patients?—Orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking |
title_sort | do we still need to screen our patients?—orthopaedic scoring based on motion tracking |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05670-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raabdominik dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking AT heitzerfalko dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking AT liawjincheng dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking AT mullerkatharina dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking AT weberlina dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking AT floresfranciscogeu dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking AT kecskemethyandres dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking AT mayerconstantin dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking AT jagermarcus dowestillneedtoscreenourpatientsorthopaedicscoringbasedonmotiontracking |