Cargando…

Supplementing transcranial direct current stimulation to local infiltration series for refractory neuropathic craniocephalic pain: A randomized controlled pilot trial

BACKGROUND: Some patients with neuralgia of cranial nerves with otherwise therapy-refractory pain respond to invasive therapy with local anesthetics. Unfortunately, pain regularly relapses despite multimodal pain management. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may prolong pain response du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wandrey, Jan D., Kastelik, Joanna, Fritzsche, Thomas, Denke, Claudia, Schäfer, Michael, Tafelski, Sascha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937523
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1069434
_version_ 1784907097147703296
author Wandrey, Jan D.
Kastelik, Joanna
Fritzsche, Thomas
Denke, Claudia
Schäfer, Michael
Tafelski, Sascha
author_facet Wandrey, Jan D.
Kastelik, Joanna
Fritzsche, Thomas
Denke, Claudia
Schäfer, Michael
Tafelski, Sascha
author_sort Wandrey, Jan D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some patients with neuralgia of cranial nerves with otherwise therapy-refractory pain respond to invasive therapy with local anesthetics. Unfortunately, pain regularly relapses despite multimodal pain management. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may prolong pain response due to neuro-modulatory effects. METHODS: This controlled clinical pilot trial randomized patients to receive anodal, cathodal or sham-tDCS stimulation prior to local anesthetic infiltration. Pain attenuation, quality-of-life and side effects were assessed and compared with historic controls to estimate effects of tDCS stimulation setting. RESULTS: Altogether, 17 patients were randomized into three groups with different stimulation protocols. Relative reduction of pain intensity in per protocol treated patients were median 73%, 50% and 69% in anodal, cathodal and sham group, respectively (p = 0.726). Compared with a historic control group, a lower rate of responders with 50% reduction of pain intensity indicates probable placebo effects (OR 3.41 stimulation vs. non-stimulation setting, NNT 3.63). 76.9% (n = 10) of tDCS patients reported mild side-effects. Of all initially included 17 patients, 23.5% (n = 4) withdrew their study participation with highest proportion in the cathodal group (n = 3). A sample size calculation for a confirmatory trial revealed 120 patients using conservative estimations. DISCUSSION: This pilot trial does not support series of anodal tDCS as neuro-modulatory treatment to enhance pain alleviation of local anesthetic infiltration series. Notably, results may indicate placebo effects of tDCS settings. Feasibility of studies in this population was limited due to relevant drop-out rates. Anodal tDCS warrants further confirmation as neuro-modulatory pain treatment option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10014889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100148892023-03-16 Supplementing transcranial direct current stimulation to local infiltration series for refractory neuropathic craniocephalic pain: A randomized controlled pilot trial Wandrey, Jan D. Kastelik, Joanna Fritzsche, Thomas Denke, Claudia Schäfer, Michael Tafelski, Sascha Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: Some patients with neuralgia of cranial nerves with otherwise therapy-refractory pain respond to invasive therapy with local anesthetics. Unfortunately, pain regularly relapses despite multimodal pain management. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may prolong pain response due to neuro-modulatory effects. METHODS: This controlled clinical pilot trial randomized patients to receive anodal, cathodal or sham-tDCS stimulation prior to local anesthetic infiltration. Pain attenuation, quality-of-life and side effects were assessed and compared with historic controls to estimate effects of tDCS stimulation setting. RESULTS: Altogether, 17 patients were randomized into three groups with different stimulation protocols. Relative reduction of pain intensity in per protocol treated patients were median 73%, 50% and 69% in anodal, cathodal and sham group, respectively (p = 0.726). Compared with a historic control group, a lower rate of responders with 50% reduction of pain intensity indicates probable placebo effects (OR 3.41 stimulation vs. non-stimulation setting, NNT 3.63). 76.9% (n = 10) of tDCS patients reported mild side-effects. Of all initially included 17 patients, 23.5% (n = 4) withdrew their study participation with highest proportion in the cathodal group (n = 3). A sample size calculation for a confirmatory trial revealed 120 patients using conservative estimations. DISCUSSION: This pilot trial does not support series of anodal tDCS as neuro-modulatory treatment to enhance pain alleviation of local anesthetic infiltration series. Notably, results may indicate placebo effects of tDCS settings. Feasibility of studies in this population was limited due to relevant drop-out rates. Anodal tDCS warrants further confirmation as neuro-modulatory pain treatment option. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10014889/ /pubmed/36937523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1069434 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wandrey, Kastelik, Fritzsche, Denke, Schäfer and Tafelski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Wandrey, Jan D.
Kastelik, Joanna
Fritzsche, Thomas
Denke, Claudia
Schäfer, Michael
Tafelski, Sascha
Supplementing transcranial direct current stimulation to local infiltration series for refractory neuropathic craniocephalic pain: A randomized controlled pilot trial
title Supplementing transcranial direct current stimulation to local infiltration series for refractory neuropathic craniocephalic pain: A randomized controlled pilot trial
title_full Supplementing transcranial direct current stimulation to local infiltration series for refractory neuropathic craniocephalic pain: A randomized controlled pilot trial
title_fullStr Supplementing transcranial direct current stimulation to local infiltration series for refractory neuropathic craniocephalic pain: A randomized controlled pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Supplementing transcranial direct current stimulation to local infiltration series for refractory neuropathic craniocephalic pain: A randomized controlled pilot trial
title_short Supplementing transcranial direct current stimulation to local infiltration series for refractory neuropathic craniocephalic pain: A randomized controlled pilot trial
title_sort supplementing transcranial direct current stimulation to local infiltration series for refractory neuropathic craniocephalic pain: a randomized controlled pilot trial
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937523
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1069434
work_keys_str_mv AT wandreyjand supplementingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtolocalinfiltrationseriesforrefractoryneuropathiccraniocephalicpainarandomizedcontrolledpilottrial
AT kastelikjoanna supplementingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtolocalinfiltrationseriesforrefractoryneuropathiccraniocephalicpainarandomizedcontrolledpilottrial
AT fritzschethomas supplementingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtolocalinfiltrationseriesforrefractoryneuropathiccraniocephalicpainarandomizedcontrolledpilottrial
AT denkeclaudia supplementingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtolocalinfiltrationseriesforrefractoryneuropathiccraniocephalicpainarandomizedcontrolledpilottrial
AT schafermichael supplementingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtolocalinfiltrationseriesforrefractoryneuropathiccraniocephalicpainarandomizedcontrolledpilottrial
AT tafelskisascha supplementingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtolocalinfiltrationseriesforrefractoryneuropathiccraniocephalicpainarandomizedcontrolledpilottrial