Cargando…

Social media interventions for autistic individuals: Systematic review

BACKGROUND: Research on the use of digital technologies for delivering behavioral interventions has shown mixed evidence on their efficacy for improving both autistic symptoms and co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Little knowledge exists on the specific use or efficacy of using social media in int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabarron, Elia, Skafle, Ingjerd, Nordahl-Hansen, Anders, Wynn, Rolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1089452
_version_ 1784907115294359552
author Gabarron, Elia
Skafle, Ingjerd
Nordahl-Hansen, Anders
Wynn, Rolf
author_facet Gabarron, Elia
Skafle, Ingjerd
Nordahl-Hansen, Anders
Wynn, Rolf
author_sort Gabarron, Elia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research on the use of digital technologies for delivering behavioral interventions has shown mixed evidence on their efficacy for improving both autistic symptoms and co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Little knowledge exists on the specific use or efficacy of using social media in interventions aimed at autistic individuals. OBJECTIVE: To review and describe the current existing evidence-based research on the use of social media in interventions aimed at autistic individuals. METHODS: A search was conducted across 8 databases (PubMed; EMBASE; Cochrane Library; PsycInfo; ERIC; Education Source; Web of Science; and IEEE Xplore). We included primary studies and reviews that dealt with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); described interventions that use social media; and reported results from the intervention. The quality of the evidence of the included primary studies was graded according to the GRADE criteria, and the risk of bias in systematic reviews was assessed by drawing on the AMSTAR guidelines. Results were synthesized and sorted by quality of evidence. RESULTS: A total of nine articles were included in this review: eight primary studies (five non-randomized interventions and three randomized interventions) and one systematic review. The total number of participants with an ASD-diagnosis in the included studies was 164 (aged 5 to 22 years old). Studies weighted as being of moderate quality of evidence have reported significant positive effects in the groups that received the social media interventions: increased social engagement and participation in life situations; increased physical activity level; increased improvement on occupational performance, specified goals, and behavioral problems; and decreased plaque scores coupled with parent reports of intervention success. None of the studies have reported any negative effects linked to social media interventions. CONCLUSION: There is very little evidence of good quality on the use of social media in interventions aimed at autistic individuals. While there is a need for more high-quality studies, all the included studies, with one exception found positive results of the interventions. These findings are encouraging, suggesting that social media-based interventions may in fact be useful for supporting behavioral changes in autistic individuals. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=337185, identifier CRD42022337185.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10014977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100149772023-03-16 Social media interventions for autistic individuals: Systematic review Gabarron, Elia Skafle, Ingjerd Nordahl-Hansen, Anders Wynn, Rolf Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Research on the use of digital technologies for delivering behavioral interventions has shown mixed evidence on their efficacy for improving both autistic symptoms and co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Little knowledge exists on the specific use or efficacy of using social media in interventions aimed at autistic individuals. OBJECTIVE: To review and describe the current existing evidence-based research on the use of social media in interventions aimed at autistic individuals. METHODS: A search was conducted across 8 databases (PubMed; EMBASE; Cochrane Library; PsycInfo; ERIC; Education Source; Web of Science; and IEEE Xplore). We included primary studies and reviews that dealt with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); described interventions that use social media; and reported results from the intervention. The quality of the evidence of the included primary studies was graded according to the GRADE criteria, and the risk of bias in systematic reviews was assessed by drawing on the AMSTAR guidelines. Results were synthesized and sorted by quality of evidence. RESULTS: A total of nine articles were included in this review: eight primary studies (five non-randomized interventions and three randomized interventions) and one systematic review. The total number of participants with an ASD-diagnosis in the included studies was 164 (aged 5 to 22 years old). Studies weighted as being of moderate quality of evidence have reported significant positive effects in the groups that received the social media interventions: increased social engagement and participation in life situations; increased physical activity level; increased improvement on occupational performance, specified goals, and behavioral problems; and decreased plaque scores coupled with parent reports of intervention success. None of the studies have reported any negative effects linked to social media interventions. CONCLUSION: There is very little evidence of good quality on the use of social media in interventions aimed at autistic individuals. While there is a need for more high-quality studies, all the included studies, with one exception found positive results of the interventions. These findings are encouraging, suggesting that social media-based interventions may in fact be useful for supporting behavioral changes in autistic individuals. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=337185, identifier CRD42022337185. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10014977/ /pubmed/36937710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1089452 Text en Copyright © 2023 Gabarron, Skafle, Nordahl-Hansen and Wynn. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Gabarron, Elia
Skafle, Ingjerd
Nordahl-Hansen, Anders
Wynn, Rolf
Social media interventions for autistic individuals: Systematic review
title Social media interventions for autistic individuals: Systematic review
title_full Social media interventions for autistic individuals: Systematic review
title_fullStr Social media interventions for autistic individuals: Systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Social media interventions for autistic individuals: Systematic review
title_short Social media interventions for autistic individuals: Systematic review
title_sort social media interventions for autistic individuals: systematic review
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1089452
work_keys_str_mv AT gabarronelia socialmediainterventionsforautisticindividualssystematicreview
AT skafleingjerd socialmediainterventionsforautisticindividualssystematicreview
AT nordahlhansenanders socialmediainterventionsforautisticindividualssystematicreview
AT wynnrolf socialmediainterventionsforautisticindividualssystematicreview