Cargando…
Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel
National immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) develop immunization-related recommendations and assist policy-makers in making evidence informed decisions. Systematic reviews (SRs) that summarize the available evidence on a specific topic are a valuable source of evidence in the developmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10015272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36804216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.027 |
_version_ | 1784907180102647808 |
---|---|
author | Pilic, Antonia Reda, Sarah Jo, Catherine L. Burchett, Helen Bastías, Magdalena Campbell, Pauline Gamage, Deepa Henaff, Louise Kagina, Benjamin Külper-Schiek, Wiebe Lunny, Carole Marti, Melanie Muloiwa, Rudzani Pieper, Dawid Thomas, James Tunis, Matthew C. Younger, Zane Wichmann, Ole Harder, Thomas |
author_facet | Pilic, Antonia Reda, Sarah Jo, Catherine L. Burchett, Helen Bastías, Magdalena Campbell, Pauline Gamage, Deepa Henaff, Louise Kagina, Benjamin Külper-Schiek, Wiebe Lunny, Carole Marti, Melanie Muloiwa, Rudzani Pieper, Dawid Thomas, James Tunis, Matthew C. Younger, Zane Wichmann, Ole Harder, Thomas |
author_sort | Pilic, Antonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | National immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) develop immunization-related recommendations and assist policy-makers in making evidence informed decisions. Systematic reviews (SRs) that summarize the available evidence on a specific topic are a valuable source of evidence in the development of such recommendations. However, conducting SRs requires significant human, time, and financial resources, which many NITAGs lack. Given that SRs already exist for many immunization-related topics, and to prevent duplication and overlap of reviews, a more practical approach may be for NITAGs to use existing SRs. Nevertheless, it can be challenging to identify relevant SRs, to select one SR from among multiple SRs, or to critically assess and effectively use them. To support NITAGs, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Robert Koch Institute and collaborators developed the SYSVAC project, which consists of an online registry of systematic reviews on immunization-related topics and an e-learning course, that supports the use of them (both freely accessible at https://www.nitag-resource.org/sysvac-systematic-reviews). Drawing from the e-learning course and recommendations from an expert panel, this paper outlines methods for using existing systematic reviews when making immunization-related recommendations. With specific examples and reference to the SYSVAC registry and other resources, it offers guidance on locating existing systematic reviews; assessing their relevance to a research question, up-to-dateness, and methodological quality and/or risk of bias; and considering the transferability and applicability of their findings to other populations or settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10015272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100152722023-03-17 Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel Pilic, Antonia Reda, Sarah Jo, Catherine L. Burchett, Helen Bastías, Magdalena Campbell, Pauline Gamage, Deepa Henaff, Louise Kagina, Benjamin Külper-Schiek, Wiebe Lunny, Carole Marti, Melanie Muloiwa, Rudzani Pieper, Dawid Thomas, James Tunis, Matthew C. Younger, Zane Wichmann, Ole Harder, Thomas Vaccine Article National immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) develop immunization-related recommendations and assist policy-makers in making evidence informed decisions. Systematic reviews (SRs) that summarize the available evidence on a specific topic are a valuable source of evidence in the development of such recommendations. However, conducting SRs requires significant human, time, and financial resources, which many NITAGs lack. Given that SRs already exist for many immunization-related topics, and to prevent duplication and overlap of reviews, a more practical approach may be for NITAGs to use existing SRs. Nevertheless, it can be challenging to identify relevant SRs, to select one SR from among multiple SRs, or to critically assess and effectively use them. To support NITAGs, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Robert Koch Institute and collaborators developed the SYSVAC project, which consists of an online registry of systematic reviews on immunization-related topics and an e-learning course, that supports the use of them (both freely accessible at https://www.nitag-resource.org/sysvac-systematic-reviews). Drawing from the e-learning course and recommendations from an expert panel, this paper outlines methods for using existing systematic reviews when making immunization-related recommendations. With specific examples and reference to the SYSVAC registry and other resources, it offers guidance on locating existing systematic reviews; assessing their relevance to a research question, up-to-dateness, and methodological quality and/or risk of bias; and considering the transferability and applicability of their findings to other populations or settings. Elsevier Science 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10015272/ /pubmed/36804216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.027 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pilic, Antonia Reda, Sarah Jo, Catherine L. Burchett, Helen Bastías, Magdalena Campbell, Pauline Gamage, Deepa Henaff, Louise Kagina, Benjamin Külper-Schiek, Wiebe Lunny, Carole Marti, Melanie Muloiwa, Rudzani Pieper, Dawid Thomas, James Tunis, Matthew C. Younger, Zane Wichmann, Ole Harder, Thomas Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel |
title | Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel |
title_full | Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel |
title_fullStr | Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel |
title_short | Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel |
title_sort | use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: guidance from the sysvac expert panel |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10015272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36804216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pilicantonia useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT redasarah useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT jocatherinel useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT burchetthelen useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT bastiasmagdalena useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT campbellpauline useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT gamagedeepa useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT henafflouise useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT kaginabenjamin useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT kulperschiekwiebe useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT lunnycarole useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT martimelanie useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT muloiwarudzani useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT pieperdawid useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT thomasjames useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT tunismatthewc useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT youngerzane useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT wichmannole useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel AT harderthomas useofexistingsystematicreviewsforthedevelopmentofevidencebasedvaccinationrecommendationsguidancefromthesysvacexpertpanel |