Cargando…
The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows
BACKGROUND: Good estrus detection in sows is essential to predict the best moment of insemination. Nowadays, a technological innovation is available that detects the estrus of the sow via connected sensors and cameras. The collected data are subsequently analyzed by an artificial intelligence (AI) s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10015655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00303-3 |
_version_ | 1784907244701220864 |
---|---|
author | Verhoeven, Steven Chantziaras, Ilias Bernaerdt, Elise Loicq, Michel Verhoeven, Ludo Maes, Dominiek |
author_facet | Verhoeven, Steven Chantziaras, Ilias Bernaerdt, Elise Loicq, Michel Verhoeven, Ludo Maes, Dominiek |
author_sort | Verhoeven, Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Good estrus detection in sows is essential to predict the best moment of insemination. Nowadays, a technological innovation is available that detects the estrus of the sow via connected sensors and cameras. The collected data are subsequently analyzed by an artificial intelligence (AI) system. This study investigated whether such an AI system could support the farmer in optimizing the moment of insemination and reproductive performance. M&M: Three Belgian sow farms (A, B and C) where the AI system was installed, participated in the study. The reproductive cycles (n = 6717) of 1.5 years before and 1.5 years after implementation of the system were included. Parameters included: (1) farrowing rate (FR), (2) percentage of repeat-breeders (RB), (3) farrowing rate after first insemination (FRFI) and (4) number of total born piglets per litter (NTBP). Also, data collected by the system were analyzed to describe the weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI), estrus duration (ED) and the number of inseminations used per estrus. This dataset included 2261 cycles, collected on farms B and C. RESULTS: In farm A, all parameters significantly improved namely FR + 4.3%, RB − 3.75%, FRFI + 6.2% and NTBP + 1.06 piglets. In farm B, the NTBP significantly decreased with 0.48 piglets, but in this farm the insemination dose was too low (0.8 × 10(9) spermatozoa per dose). In farm C, only the NTBP significantly increased with 0.45 piglets after the implementation of the system. The WEI as determined by the system varied between 78 and 90 h, being 10–20 h shorter in comparison with the WEI as determined by the farmer. The ED, determined by the system ranged from 48 to 60 h, and was less variable as compared to the ED as assessed by the farmer. The mean number of inseminations per estrus remained similar over time in farm B whereas it decreased over time from approximately 1.6–1.2 in farm C. CONCLUSION: The AI system can help farmers to improve the reproductive performance, assess estrus characteristics and reduce the number of inseminations per estrus. Results may vary between farms as many other variables such as farm management, genetics and insemination dose also influence reproductive performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10015655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100156552023-03-16 The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows Verhoeven, Steven Chantziaras, Ilias Bernaerdt, Elise Loicq, Michel Verhoeven, Ludo Maes, Dominiek Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Good estrus detection in sows is essential to predict the best moment of insemination. Nowadays, a technological innovation is available that detects the estrus of the sow via connected sensors and cameras. The collected data are subsequently analyzed by an artificial intelligence (AI) system. This study investigated whether such an AI system could support the farmer in optimizing the moment of insemination and reproductive performance. M&M: Three Belgian sow farms (A, B and C) where the AI system was installed, participated in the study. The reproductive cycles (n = 6717) of 1.5 years before and 1.5 years after implementation of the system were included. Parameters included: (1) farrowing rate (FR), (2) percentage of repeat-breeders (RB), (3) farrowing rate after first insemination (FRFI) and (4) number of total born piglets per litter (NTBP). Also, data collected by the system were analyzed to describe the weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI), estrus duration (ED) and the number of inseminations used per estrus. This dataset included 2261 cycles, collected on farms B and C. RESULTS: In farm A, all parameters significantly improved namely FR + 4.3%, RB − 3.75%, FRFI + 6.2% and NTBP + 1.06 piglets. In farm B, the NTBP significantly decreased with 0.48 piglets, but in this farm the insemination dose was too low (0.8 × 10(9) spermatozoa per dose). In farm C, only the NTBP significantly increased with 0.45 piglets after the implementation of the system. The WEI as determined by the system varied between 78 and 90 h, being 10–20 h shorter in comparison with the WEI as determined by the farmer. The ED, determined by the system ranged from 48 to 60 h, and was less variable as compared to the ED as assessed by the farmer. The mean number of inseminations per estrus remained similar over time in farm B whereas it decreased over time from approximately 1.6–1.2 in farm C. CONCLUSION: The AI system can help farmers to improve the reproductive performance, assess estrus characteristics and reduce the number of inseminations per estrus. Results may vary between farms as many other variables such as farm management, genetics and insemination dose also influence reproductive performance. BioMed Central 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10015655/ /pubmed/36918979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00303-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Verhoeven, Steven Chantziaras, Ilias Bernaerdt, Elise Loicq, Michel Verhoeven, Ludo Maes, Dominiek The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows |
title | The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows |
title_full | The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows |
title_short | The evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows |
title_sort | evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for estrus detection in sows |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10015655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00303-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verhoevensteven theevaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT chantziarasilias theevaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT bernaerdtelise theevaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT loicqmichel theevaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT verhoevenludo theevaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT maesdominiek theevaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT verhoevensteven evaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT chantziarasilias evaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT bernaerdtelise evaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT loicqmichel evaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT verhoevenludo evaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows AT maesdominiek evaluationofanartificialintelligencesystemforestrusdetectioninsows |