Cargando…

Inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient DNA-specific software packages to low coverage data

BACKGROUND: The inference of biological relations between individuals is fundamental to understanding past human societies. Caregiving, resource sharing and sexual behaviours are often mediated by biological kinship and yet the identification and interpretation of kin relationships in prehistoric hu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marsh, William A, Brace, Selina, Barnes, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10015695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09198-4
_version_ 1784907251456147456
author Marsh, William A
Brace, Selina
Barnes, Ian
author_facet Marsh, William A
Brace, Selina
Barnes, Ian
author_sort Marsh, William A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The inference of biological relations between individuals is fundamental to understanding past human societies. Caregiving, resource sharing and sexual behaviours are often mediated by biological kinship and yet the identification and interpretation of kin relationships in prehistoric human groups is difficult. In recent years, the advent of archaeogenetic techniques have offered a fresh approach, and when combined with more traditional osteological and interpretive archaeological methods, allows for improved interpretation of the burial practices, cultural behaviours, and societal stratification in ancient societies. Although archaeogenetic techniques are developing at pace, questions remain as to their accuracy, particularly when applied to the low coverage datasets that results from the sequencing of DNA derived from highly degraded ancient material. RESULTS: The performance of six of the most commonly used kinship identifcation software methods was explored at a range of low and ultra low genome coverages. An asymmetrical response was observed across packages, with decreased genome coverage resulting in differences in both direction and degree of change of calculated kinship scores and thus pairwise relatedness estimates are dependant on both package used and genome coverage. Methods reliant upon genotype likelihoods methods (lcMLkin, NGSrelate and NGSremix) show a decreased level of prediction at coverage below 1x, although were consistent in the particular relationships identified at these coverages when compared to the pseudohaploid reliant methods tested (READ, the Kennett 2017 method and TKGWV2.0). The three pseudohaploid methods show predictive potential at coverages as low as 0.05x, although the accuracy of the relationships identified is questionable given the increase in the number of relationships identifIed at the low coverage (type I errors). CONCLUSION: Two pseudohaploid methods (READ and Kennett 2017) show relatively consistent inference of kin relationships at low coverage (0.5x), with READ only showing a significant performance drop off at ultralow coverages (< 0.2x). More generally, our results reveal asymmetrical kinship classifications in some software packages even at high coverages, highlighting the importance of applying multiple methods to authenticate kin relationships in ancient material, along with the continuing need to develop laboratory methods that maximise data output for downstream analyses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09198-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10015695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100156952023-03-16 Inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient DNA-specific software packages to low coverage data Marsh, William A Brace, Selina Barnes, Ian BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: The inference of biological relations between individuals is fundamental to understanding past human societies. Caregiving, resource sharing and sexual behaviours are often mediated by biological kinship and yet the identification and interpretation of kin relationships in prehistoric human groups is difficult. In recent years, the advent of archaeogenetic techniques have offered a fresh approach, and when combined with more traditional osteological and interpretive archaeological methods, allows for improved interpretation of the burial practices, cultural behaviours, and societal stratification in ancient societies. Although archaeogenetic techniques are developing at pace, questions remain as to their accuracy, particularly when applied to the low coverage datasets that results from the sequencing of DNA derived from highly degraded ancient material. RESULTS: The performance of six of the most commonly used kinship identifcation software methods was explored at a range of low and ultra low genome coverages. An asymmetrical response was observed across packages, with decreased genome coverage resulting in differences in both direction and degree of change of calculated kinship scores and thus pairwise relatedness estimates are dependant on both package used and genome coverage. Methods reliant upon genotype likelihoods methods (lcMLkin, NGSrelate and NGSremix) show a decreased level of prediction at coverage below 1x, although were consistent in the particular relationships identified at these coverages when compared to the pseudohaploid reliant methods tested (READ, the Kennett 2017 method and TKGWV2.0). The three pseudohaploid methods show predictive potential at coverages as low as 0.05x, although the accuracy of the relationships identified is questionable given the increase in the number of relationships identifIed at the low coverage (type I errors). CONCLUSION: Two pseudohaploid methods (READ and Kennett 2017) show relatively consistent inference of kin relationships at low coverage (0.5x), with READ only showing a significant performance drop off at ultralow coverages (< 0.2x). More generally, our results reveal asymmetrical kinship classifications in some software packages even at high coverages, highlighting the importance of applying multiple methods to authenticate kin relationships in ancient material, along with the continuing need to develop laboratory methods that maximise data output for downstream analyses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09198-4. BioMed Central 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10015695/ /pubmed/36918761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09198-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Marsh, William A
Brace, Selina
Barnes, Ian
Inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient DNA-specific software packages to low coverage data
title Inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient DNA-specific software packages to low coverage data
title_full Inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient DNA-specific software packages to low coverage data
title_fullStr Inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient DNA-specific software packages to low coverage data
title_full_unstemmed Inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient DNA-specific software packages to low coverage data
title_short Inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient DNA-specific software packages to low coverage data
title_sort inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient dna-specific software packages to low coverage data
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10015695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09198-4
work_keys_str_mv AT marshwilliama inferringbiologicalkinshipinancientdatasetscomparingtheresponseofancientdnaspecificsoftwarepackagestolowcoveragedata
AT braceselina inferringbiologicalkinshipinancientdatasetscomparingtheresponseofancientdnaspecificsoftwarepackagestolowcoveragedata
AT barnesian inferringbiologicalkinshipinancientdatasetscomparingtheresponseofancientdnaspecificsoftwarepackagestolowcoveragedata