Cargando…
Causal Judgment in the Wild: Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
When explaining why an event occurred, people intuitively highlight some causes while ignoring others. How do people decide which causes to select? Models of causal judgment have been evaluated in simple and controlled laboratory experiments, but they have yet to be tested in a complex real‐world se...
Autores principales: | Quillien, Tadeg, Barlev, Michael |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10015993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35122295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13101 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Quantifying the role of the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020 U.S. presidential elections
por: De Lellis, Pietro, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election
por: Curtis, Lesley H., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Should Biden Apologize for Trump? National Remorse and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
por: Smith, Nick
Publicado: (2021) -
#Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election
por: Chen, Emily, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data
por: Rizk, Rodrigue, et al.
Publicado: (2023)