Cargando…
Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings
BACKGROUND: Being a general practitioner (GP) is a stressful occupation, and the strain GPs are under can have negative effects on their psychological well-being, as well as on the patients’ experience of healthcare. Resilience can help buffer against this and is a dynamic process by which one can c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad016 |
_version_ | 1784907323735539712 |
---|---|
author | Kaleta, F O Kristensen, C B Duncan, M Crutchley, P Kerr, P Hirsch, C R |
author_facet | Kaleta, F O Kristensen, C B Duncan, M Crutchley, P Kerr, P Hirsch, C R |
author_sort | Kaleta, F O |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Being a general practitioner (GP) is a stressful occupation, and the strain GPs are under can have negative effects on their psychological well-being, as well as on the patients’ experience of healthcare. Resilience can help buffer against this and is a dynamic process by which one can cope with adversity and stress. AIMS: This study aimed to identify modifiable cognitive mechanisms related to resilience in GPs, specifically interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen GPs completed an online cross-sectional correlational study. This comprised questionnaires assessing resilience, emotional distress, work environment and cognitive mechanisms (emotion regulation), as well as a task assessing interpretation bias. RESULTS: Resilience of GPs was negatively correlated with measures of emotional distress. Furthermore, resilience was positively correlated with positive interpretation bias (r = 0.60, ρ = 0.60, P < 0.01) and cognitive reappraisal (r = 0.39, ρ = 0.40, P < 0.01). In a hierarchical regression, positive interpretation bias (B = 0.25, SE B = 0.06, β = 0.39, P < 0.01) was a significant independent predictor of resilience when controlling for depression, anxiety and stress. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to establish an association between resilience and positive interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal in GPs. Future research should use longitudinal designs to determine if they have a causal role in promoting resilience, and importantly whether interventions focusing on these processes may foster resilience in less resilient GPs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10016029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100160292023-03-16 Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings Kaleta, F O Kristensen, C B Duncan, M Crutchley, P Kerr, P Hirsch, C R Occup Med (Lond) Original Papers BACKGROUND: Being a general practitioner (GP) is a stressful occupation, and the strain GPs are under can have negative effects on their psychological well-being, as well as on the patients’ experience of healthcare. Resilience can help buffer against this and is a dynamic process by which one can cope with adversity and stress. AIMS: This study aimed to identify modifiable cognitive mechanisms related to resilience in GPs, specifically interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen GPs completed an online cross-sectional correlational study. This comprised questionnaires assessing resilience, emotional distress, work environment and cognitive mechanisms (emotion regulation), as well as a task assessing interpretation bias. RESULTS: Resilience of GPs was negatively correlated with measures of emotional distress. Furthermore, resilience was positively correlated with positive interpretation bias (r = 0.60, ρ = 0.60, P < 0.01) and cognitive reappraisal (r = 0.39, ρ = 0.40, P < 0.01). In a hierarchical regression, positive interpretation bias (B = 0.25, SE B = 0.06, β = 0.39, P < 0.01) was a significant independent predictor of resilience when controlling for depression, anxiety and stress. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to establish an association between resilience and positive interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal in GPs. Future research should use longitudinal designs to determine if they have a causal role in promoting resilience, and importantly whether interventions focusing on these processes may foster resilience in less resilient GPs. Oxford University Press 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10016029/ /pubmed/36745461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad016 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Kaleta, F O Kristensen, C B Duncan, M Crutchley, P Kerr, P Hirsch, C R Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings |
title | Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings |
title_full | Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings |
title_fullStr | Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings |
title_short | Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings |
title_sort | cognitive mechanisms and resilience in uk-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaletafo cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings AT kristensencb cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings AT duncanm cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings AT crutchleyp cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings AT kerrp cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings AT hirschcr cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings |