Cargando…

Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings

BACKGROUND: Being a general practitioner (GP) is a stressful occupation, and the strain GPs are under can have negative effects on their psychological well-being, as well as on the patients’ experience of healthcare. Resilience can help buffer against this and is a dynamic process by which one can c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaleta, F O, Kristensen, C B, Duncan, M, Crutchley, P, Kerr, P, Hirsch, C R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad016
_version_ 1784907323735539712
author Kaleta, F O
Kristensen, C B
Duncan, M
Crutchley, P
Kerr, P
Hirsch, C R
author_facet Kaleta, F O
Kristensen, C B
Duncan, M
Crutchley, P
Kerr, P
Hirsch, C R
author_sort Kaleta, F O
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Being a general practitioner (GP) is a stressful occupation, and the strain GPs are under can have negative effects on their psychological well-being, as well as on the patients’ experience of healthcare. Resilience can help buffer against this and is a dynamic process by which one can cope with adversity and stress. AIMS: This study aimed to identify modifiable cognitive mechanisms related to resilience in GPs, specifically interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen GPs completed an online cross-sectional correlational study. This comprised questionnaires assessing resilience, emotional distress, work environment and cognitive mechanisms (emotion regulation), as well as a task assessing interpretation bias. RESULTS: Resilience of GPs was negatively correlated with measures of emotional distress. Furthermore, resilience was positively correlated with positive interpretation bias (r = 0.60, ρ = 0.60, P < 0.01) and cognitive reappraisal (r = 0.39, ρ = 0.40, P < 0.01). In a hierarchical regression, positive interpretation bias (B = 0.25, SE B = 0.06, β = 0.39, P < 0.01) was a significant independent predictor of resilience when controlling for depression, anxiety and stress. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to establish an association between resilience and positive interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal in GPs. Future research should use longitudinal designs to determine if they have a causal role in promoting resilience, and importantly whether interventions focusing on these processes may foster resilience in less resilient GPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10016029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100160292023-03-16 Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings Kaleta, F O Kristensen, C B Duncan, M Crutchley, P Kerr, P Hirsch, C R Occup Med (Lond) Original Papers BACKGROUND: Being a general practitioner (GP) is a stressful occupation, and the strain GPs are under can have negative effects on their psychological well-being, as well as on the patients’ experience of healthcare. Resilience can help buffer against this and is a dynamic process by which one can cope with adversity and stress. AIMS: This study aimed to identify modifiable cognitive mechanisms related to resilience in GPs, specifically interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen GPs completed an online cross-sectional correlational study. This comprised questionnaires assessing resilience, emotional distress, work environment and cognitive mechanisms (emotion regulation), as well as a task assessing interpretation bias. RESULTS: Resilience of GPs was negatively correlated with measures of emotional distress. Furthermore, resilience was positively correlated with positive interpretation bias (r = 0.60, ρ = 0.60, P < 0.01) and cognitive reappraisal (r = 0.39, ρ = 0.40, P < 0.01). In a hierarchical regression, positive interpretation bias (B = 0.25, SE B = 0.06, β = 0.39, P < 0.01) was a significant independent predictor of resilience when controlling for depression, anxiety and stress. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to establish an association between resilience and positive interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal in GPs. Future research should use longitudinal designs to determine if they have a causal role in promoting resilience, and importantly whether interventions focusing on these processes may foster resilience in less resilient GPs. Oxford University Press 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10016029/ /pubmed/36745461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad016 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Kaleta, F O
Kristensen, C B
Duncan, M
Crutchley, P
Kerr, P
Hirsch, C R
Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings
title Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings
title_full Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings
title_fullStr Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings
title_short Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings
title_sort cognitive mechanisms and resilience in uk-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad016
work_keys_str_mv AT kaletafo cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings
AT kristensencb cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings
AT duncanm cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings
AT crutchleyp cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings
AT kerrp cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings
AT hirschcr cognitivemechanismsandresilienceinukbasedgeneralpractitionerscrosssectionalfindings