Cargando…

Combined Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Neuromodulation to Treat Cervical Facet Joint Pain and Alleviate Postcervical Radiofrequency Side Effects

BACKGROUND: Continuous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can effectively manage cervical facet joint pain related to neuropathic symptoms in the post-radiofrequency period. Additionally, pulse radiofrequency (PRF) provides relief of neuropathic symptoms. However, the effect of combined RFA and PRF has y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malaithong, Wanwipha, Munjupong, Sithapan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brieflands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938106
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm-129747
_version_ 1784907338368417792
author Malaithong, Wanwipha
Munjupong, Sithapan
author_facet Malaithong, Wanwipha
Munjupong, Sithapan
author_sort Malaithong, Wanwipha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continuous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can effectively manage cervical facet joint pain related to neuropathic symptoms in the post-radiofrequency period. Additionally, pulse radiofrequency (PRF) provides relief of neuropathic symptoms. However, the effect of combined RFA and PRF has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of RFA (CRF group) and combined RFA and PRF (CPRF group). METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with cervical facet joint pain undergoing RFA between June 1, 2014, and June 1, 2017, or combined RFA and PRF between June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2020, at a pain research center. Thirty-nine consecutive patients identified from charts meeting the inclusion criteria were included and classified in CRF (n = 22) and CPRF groups (n = 17). The results were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and neck pain disability index (NDI) before procedures and 1, 3, and 6 months after the injections. Successful treatment was expressed as at least 80% pain relief from baseline and NDI score <15 points. The duration of pain relief was expressed as the period between pain relief and pain reoccurrence to 50% of the preprocedural pain level. The primary outcome was successful treatment in the groups, and the secondary outcome was the duration of pain relief and post-cervical radiofrequency side effects in the groups. RESULTS: Fourteen (66.7%) patients in the CRF group and 12 (66.7%) in the CPRF group experienced successful treatment at three and six-month follow-ups (P > 0.05). The median time to the reoccurrence of at least 50% of preprocedural pain level was 303.8 days in the CRF group and 270 days in the CPRF group (P = 0.395). However, the CPRF group showed significantly less postoperative numbness, dysesthesia, and hypersensitivity syndrome than the CRF group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined RFA and PRF can be complementary treatment for cervical facet joint pain, providing an adequate success rate and duration of pain relief as RFA alone but with significantly fewer post-radiofrequency side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10016117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Brieflands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100161172023-03-16 Combined Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Neuromodulation to Treat Cervical Facet Joint Pain and Alleviate Postcervical Radiofrequency Side Effects Malaithong, Wanwipha Munjupong, Sithapan Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Continuous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can effectively manage cervical facet joint pain related to neuropathic symptoms in the post-radiofrequency period. Additionally, pulse radiofrequency (PRF) provides relief of neuropathic symptoms. However, the effect of combined RFA and PRF has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of RFA (CRF group) and combined RFA and PRF (CPRF group). METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with cervical facet joint pain undergoing RFA between June 1, 2014, and June 1, 2017, or combined RFA and PRF between June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2020, at a pain research center. Thirty-nine consecutive patients identified from charts meeting the inclusion criteria were included and classified in CRF (n = 22) and CPRF groups (n = 17). The results were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and neck pain disability index (NDI) before procedures and 1, 3, and 6 months after the injections. Successful treatment was expressed as at least 80% pain relief from baseline and NDI score <15 points. The duration of pain relief was expressed as the period between pain relief and pain reoccurrence to 50% of the preprocedural pain level. The primary outcome was successful treatment in the groups, and the secondary outcome was the duration of pain relief and post-cervical radiofrequency side effects in the groups. RESULTS: Fourteen (66.7%) patients in the CRF group and 12 (66.7%) in the CPRF group experienced successful treatment at three and six-month follow-ups (P > 0.05). The median time to the reoccurrence of at least 50% of preprocedural pain level was 303.8 days in the CRF group and 270 days in the CPRF group (P = 0.395). However, the CPRF group showed significantly less postoperative numbness, dysesthesia, and hypersensitivity syndrome than the CRF group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined RFA and PRF can be complementary treatment for cervical facet joint pain, providing an adequate success rate and duration of pain relief as RFA alone but with significantly fewer post-radiofrequency side effects. Brieflands 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10016117/ /pubmed/36938106 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm-129747 Text en Copyright © 2022, Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malaithong, Wanwipha
Munjupong, Sithapan
Combined Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Neuromodulation to Treat Cervical Facet Joint Pain and Alleviate Postcervical Radiofrequency Side Effects
title Combined Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Neuromodulation to Treat Cervical Facet Joint Pain and Alleviate Postcervical Radiofrequency Side Effects
title_full Combined Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Neuromodulation to Treat Cervical Facet Joint Pain and Alleviate Postcervical Radiofrequency Side Effects
title_fullStr Combined Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Neuromodulation to Treat Cervical Facet Joint Pain and Alleviate Postcervical Radiofrequency Side Effects
title_full_unstemmed Combined Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Neuromodulation to Treat Cervical Facet Joint Pain and Alleviate Postcervical Radiofrequency Side Effects
title_short Combined Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Neuromodulation to Treat Cervical Facet Joint Pain and Alleviate Postcervical Radiofrequency Side Effects
title_sort combined continuous radiofrequency ablation and pulsed neuromodulation to treat cervical facet joint pain and alleviate postcervical radiofrequency side effects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938106
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm-129747
work_keys_str_mv AT malaithongwanwipha combinedcontinuousradiofrequencyablationandpulsedneuromodulationtotreatcervicalfacetjointpainandalleviatepostcervicalradiofrequencysideeffects
AT munjupongsithapan combinedcontinuousradiofrequencyablationandpulsedneuromodulationtotreatcervicalfacetjointpainandalleviatepostcervicalradiofrequencysideeffects