Cargando…

Stop the Divide: Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Digital Health Interventions Among Socially Disadvantaged Populations

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic ushered in rapid adoption of telehealth services. This study examines patient and provider experience and provides recommendations for facilitating the use of digital health interventions among socially disadvantaged populations. Methods: This qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Price-Haywood, Eboni G., Arnold, Connie, Harden-Barrios, Jewel, Davis, Terry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936477
http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.22.0101
_version_ 1784907360505954304
author Price-Haywood, Eboni G.
Arnold, Connie
Harden-Barrios, Jewel
Davis, Terry
author_facet Price-Haywood, Eboni G.
Arnold, Connie
Harden-Barrios, Jewel
Davis, Terry
author_sort Price-Haywood, Eboni G.
collection PubMed
description Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic ushered in rapid adoption of telehealth services. This study examines patient and provider experience and provides recommendations for facilitating the use of digital health interventions among socially disadvantaged populations. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted from May to July 2021 via semistructured interviews. Forty patients and 30 primary care providers (PCPs) in Louisiana were recruited within an integrated delivery health system and a rural health center. Technology acceptance models were used to develop a thematic coding scheme. Results: Most patients self-identified as Black (67.5%) and female (72.5%), had a mean age of 51 years, lived in an urban area (76.9%), and had Medicaid (57.9%). Most PCPs were White (79.3%) and male (51.7%), had a mean age of 39 years, and reported Medicaid as the predominant insurer (58.6%). Patient use of smartphones for internet access to health and nonhealth activities was common. PCPs noted the need to address misinformation or misinterpretation of information on the internet. Most patients had used a patient portal (72.5%) and noted the convenience of messaging. PCPs reported large increases in messaging workloads. Most patients had had telemedicine visits (65.6%); however, Wi-Fi/broadband problems limited video visits. PCPs expressed concerns regarding the types of chief complaints that are appropriate for telemedicine visits and reported workflow inefficiencies when clinic sessions had mixed visit types. Patients and PCPs valued remote telemonitoring as adjuncts to care; however, limited service availability and insurance coverage were barriers. Conclusion: Infrastructure barriers (broadband, insurance) and workload imbalance temper enthusiasm for using digital health solutions. Health systems should implement complementary patient and provider user-centric strategies for facilitating uptake of technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10016217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100162172023-03-16 Stop the Divide: Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Digital Health Interventions Among Socially Disadvantaged Populations Price-Haywood, Eboni G. Arnold, Connie Harden-Barrios, Jewel Davis, Terry Ochsner J Original Research Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic ushered in rapid adoption of telehealth services. This study examines patient and provider experience and provides recommendations for facilitating the use of digital health interventions among socially disadvantaged populations. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted from May to July 2021 via semistructured interviews. Forty patients and 30 primary care providers (PCPs) in Louisiana were recruited within an integrated delivery health system and a rural health center. Technology acceptance models were used to develop a thematic coding scheme. Results: Most patients self-identified as Black (67.5%) and female (72.5%), had a mean age of 51 years, lived in an urban area (76.9%), and had Medicaid (57.9%). Most PCPs were White (79.3%) and male (51.7%), had a mean age of 39 years, and reported Medicaid as the predominant insurer (58.6%). Patient use of smartphones for internet access to health and nonhealth activities was common. PCPs noted the need to address misinformation or misinterpretation of information on the internet. Most patients had used a patient portal (72.5%) and noted the convenience of messaging. PCPs reported large increases in messaging workloads. Most patients had had telemedicine visits (65.6%); however, Wi-Fi/broadband problems limited video visits. PCPs expressed concerns regarding the types of chief complaints that are appropriate for telemedicine visits and reported workflow inefficiencies when clinic sessions had mixed visit types. Patients and PCPs valued remote telemonitoring as adjuncts to care; however, limited service availability and insurance coverage were barriers. Conclusion: Infrastructure barriers (broadband, insurance) and workload imbalance temper enthusiasm for using digital health solutions. Health systems should implement complementary patient and provider user-centric strategies for facilitating uptake of technology. Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2023 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10016217/ /pubmed/36936477 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.22.0101 Text en ©2023 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/©2023 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Price-Haywood, Eboni G.
Arnold, Connie
Harden-Barrios, Jewel
Davis, Terry
Stop the Divide: Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Digital Health Interventions Among Socially Disadvantaged Populations
title Stop the Divide: Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Digital Health Interventions Among Socially Disadvantaged Populations
title_full Stop the Divide: Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Digital Health Interventions Among Socially Disadvantaged Populations
title_fullStr Stop the Divide: Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Digital Health Interventions Among Socially Disadvantaged Populations
title_full_unstemmed Stop the Divide: Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Digital Health Interventions Among Socially Disadvantaged Populations
title_short Stop the Divide: Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Digital Health Interventions Among Socially Disadvantaged Populations
title_sort stop the divide: facilitators and barriers to uptake of digital health interventions among socially disadvantaged populations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936477
http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.22.0101
work_keys_str_mv AT pricehaywoodebonig stopthedividefacilitatorsandbarrierstouptakeofdigitalhealthinterventionsamongsociallydisadvantagedpopulations
AT arnoldconnie stopthedividefacilitatorsandbarrierstouptakeofdigitalhealthinterventionsamongsociallydisadvantagedpopulations
AT hardenbarriosjewel stopthedividefacilitatorsandbarrierstouptakeofdigitalhealthinterventionsamongsociallydisadvantagedpopulations
AT davisterry stopthedividefacilitatorsandbarrierstouptakeofdigitalhealthinterventionsamongsociallydisadvantagedpopulations