Cargando…
Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings
INTRODUCTION: Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAAC) has been established as an alternative treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of stroke. The WATCHMAN FLX (WM FLX) as the newest WATCHMAN LAAC device differs in several technical characteristi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002246 |
_version_ | 1784907366367494144 |
---|---|
author | Sakriss, Charlotte Roehl, Peter Schwenzky, Andreas Hoyme, Matthias Ebelt, Henning |
author_facet | Sakriss, Charlotte Roehl, Peter Schwenzky, Andreas Hoyme, Matthias Ebelt, Henning |
author_sort | Sakriss, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAAC) has been established as an alternative treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of stroke. The WATCHMAN FLX (WM FLX) as the newest WATCHMAN LAAC device differs in several technical characteristics from its precursor, the WATCHMAN V.2.5 (WM V.2.5). METHODS: The data presented here are derived from a retrospective single-centre study. All patients in which an LAAC was performed between February 2017 and March 2021 with either a WM V.2.5 or WM FLX device were included. RESULTS: 169 patients were included in this study, of whom 95 had been treated with WM V.2.5 and 74 with WM FLX, respectively. Directly after implantation, only minor differences regarding membrane thickness and connector protrusion were noted, whereas no relevant differences were found regarding device sizing, device compression or peridevice leakage, respectively. However, at 3-month follow-up, device compression was significantly reduced in WM FLX indicating a continued device expansion which was paralleled by a reduced number of peridevice leakage in comparison to WM V.2.5. Additionally, the combined clinical endpoint of death, stroke/transistoric ischaemic attack, tamponade, device embolisation, device-related thrombosis or peridevice leakage was reduced in WM FLX. CONCLUSION: LAAC using the WM FLX device results in a continued device expansion over the first 3 months based on differences in radial force in comparison to WM V.2.5. This is accompanied by a reduction in adverse clinical endpoints. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10016248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100162482023-03-16 Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings Sakriss, Charlotte Roehl, Peter Schwenzky, Andreas Hoyme, Matthias Ebelt, Henning Open Heart Interventional Cardiology INTRODUCTION: Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAAC) has been established as an alternative treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of stroke. The WATCHMAN FLX (WM FLX) as the newest WATCHMAN LAAC device differs in several technical characteristics from its precursor, the WATCHMAN V.2.5 (WM V.2.5). METHODS: The data presented here are derived from a retrospective single-centre study. All patients in which an LAAC was performed between February 2017 and March 2021 with either a WM V.2.5 or WM FLX device were included. RESULTS: 169 patients were included in this study, of whom 95 had been treated with WM V.2.5 and 74 with WM FLX, respectively. Directly after implantation, only minor differences regarding membrane thickness and connector protrusion were noted, whereas no relevant differences were found regarding device sizing, device compression or peridevice leakage, respectively. However, at 3-month follow-up, device compression was significantly reduced in WM FLX indicating a continued device expansion which was paralleled by a reduced number of peridevice leakage in comparison to WM V.2.5. Additionally, the combined clinical endpoint of death, stroke/transistoric ischaemic attack, tamponade, device embolisation, device-related thrombosis or peridevice leakage was reduced in WM FLX. CONCLUSION: LAAC using the WM FLX device results in a continued device expansion over the first 3 months based on differences in radial force in comparison to WM V.2.5. This is accompanied by a reduction in adverse clinical endpoints. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10016248/ /pubmed/36918230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002246 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Interventional Cardiology Sakriss, Charlotte Roehl, Peter Schwenzky, Andreas Hoyme, Matthias Ebelt, Henning Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings |
title | Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings |
title_full | Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings |
title_fullStr | Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings |
title_full_unstemmed | Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings |
title_short | Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings |
title_sort | transition from watchman v.2.5 to watchman flx for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings |
topic | Interventional Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakrisscharlotte transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings AT roehlpeter transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings AT schwenzkyandreas transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings AT hoymematthias transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings AT ebelthenning transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings |