Cargando…

Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings

INTRODUCTION: Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAAC) has been established as an alternative treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of stroke. The WATCHMAN FLX (WM FLX) as the newest WATCHMAN LAAC device differs in several technical characteristi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakriss, Charlotte, Roehl, Peter, Schwenzky, Andreas, Hoyme, Matthias, Ebelt, Henning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002246
_version_ 1784907366367494144
author Sakriss, Charlotte
Roehl, Peter
Schwenzky, Andreas
Hoyme, Matthias
Ebelt, Henning
author_facet Sakriss, Charlotte
Roehl, Peter
Schwenzky, Andreas
Hoyme, Matthias
Ebelt, Henning
author_sort Sakriss, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAAC) has been established as an alternative treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of stroke. The WATCHMAN FLX (WM FLX) as the newest WATCHMAN LAAC device differs in several technical characteristics from its precursor, the WATCHMAN V.2.5 (WM V.2.5). METHODS: The data presented here are derived from a retrospective single-centre study. All patients in which an LAAC was performed between February 2017 and March 2021 with either a WM V.2.5 or WM FLX device were included. RESULTS: 169 patients were included in this study, of whom 95 had been treated with WM V.2.5 and 74 with WM FLX, respectively. Directly after implantation, only minor differences regarding membrane thickness and connector protrusion were noted, whereas no relevant differences were found regarding device sizing, device compression or peridevice leakage, respectively. However, at 3-month follow-up, device compression was significantly reduced in WM FLX indicating a continued device expansion which was paralleled by a reduced number of peridevice leakage in comparison to WM V.2.5. Additionally, the combined clinical endpoint of death, stroke/transistoric ischaemic attack, tamponade, device embolisation, device-related thrombosis or peridevice leakage was reduced in WM FLX. CONCLUSION: LAAC using the WM FLX device results in a continued device expansion over the first 3 months based on differences in radial force in comparison to WM V.2.5. This is accompanied by a reduction in adverse clinical endpoints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10016248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100162482023-03-16 Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings Sakriss, Charlotte Roehl, Peter Schwenzky, Andreas Hoyme, Matthias Ebelt, Henning Open Heart Interventional Cardiology INTRODUCTION: Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAAC) has been established as an alternative treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of stroke. The WATCHMAN FLX (WM FLX) as the newest WATCHMAN LAAC device differs in several technical characteristics from its precursor, the WATCHMAN V.2.5 (WM V.2.5). METHODS: The data presented here are derived from a retrospective single-centre study. All patients in which an LAAC was performed between February 2017 and March 2021 with either a WM V.2.5 or WM FLX device were included. RESULTS: 169 patients were included in this study, of whom 95 had been treated with WM V.2.5 and 74 with WM FLX, respectively. Directly after implantation, only minor differences regarding membrane thickness and connector protrusion were noted, whereas no relevant differences were found regarding device sizing, device compression or peridevice leakage, respectively. However, at 3-month follow-up, device compression was significantly reduced in WM FLX indicating a continued device expansion which was paralleled by a reduced number of peridevice leakage in comparison to WM V.2.5. Additionally, the combined clinical endpoint of death, stroke/transistoric ischaemic attack, tamponade, device embolisation, device-related thrombosis or peridevice leakage was reduced in WM FLX. CONCLUSION: LAAC using the WM FLX device results in a continued device expansion over the first 3 months based on differences in radial force in comparison to WM V.2.5. This is accompanied by a reduction in adverse clinical endpoints. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10016248/ /pubmed/36918230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002246 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Interventional Cardiology
Sakriss, Charlotte
Roehl, Peter
Schwenzky, Andreas
Hoyme, Matthias
Ebelt, Henning
Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings
title Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings
title_full Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings
title_fullStr Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings
title_full_unstemmed Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings
title_short Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings
title_sort transition from watchman v.2.5 to watchman flx for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings
topic Interventional Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002246
work_keys_str_mv AT sakrisscharlotte transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings
AT roehlpeter transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings
AT schwenzkyandreas transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings
AT hoymematthias transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings
AT ebelthenning transitionfromwatchmanv25towatchmanflxforclosureoftheleftatrialappendageechocardiographicandclinicalfindings