Cargando…
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Scores in predicting mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis in a low-income and middle-income country. DESIGN: A multicentre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064870 |
_version_ | 1784907369610739712 |
---|---|
author | Do, Son Ngoc Dao, Co Xuan Nguyen, Tuan Anh Nguyen, My Ha Pham, Dung Thi Nguyen, Nga Thi Huynh, Dai Quang Hoang, Quoc Trong Ai Bui, Cuong Van Vu, Thang Dinh Bui, Ha Nhat Nguyen, Hung Tan Hoang, Hai Bui Le, Thuy Thi Phuong Nguyen, Lien Thi Bao Duong, Phuoc Thien Nguyen, Tuan Dang Le, Vuong Hung Pham, Giang Thi Tra Bui, Giang Thi Huong Bui, Tam Van Pham, Thao Thi Ngoc Nguyen, Chi Van Nguyen, Anh Dat Phua, Jason Li, Andrew Luong, Chinh Quoc |
author_facet | Do, Son Ngoc Dao, Co Xuan Nguyen, Tuan Anh Nguyen, My Ha Pham, Dung Thi Nguyen, Nga Thi Huynh, Dai Quang Hoang, Quoc Trong Ai Bui, Cuong Van Vu, Thang Dinh Bui, Ha Nhat Nguyen, Hung Tan Hoang, Hai Bui Le, Thuy Thi Phuong Nguyen, Lien Thi Bao Duong, Phuoc Thien Nguyen, Tuan Dang Le, Vuong Hung Pham, Giang Thi Tra Bui, Giang Thi Huong Bui, Tam Van Pham, Thao Thi Ngoc Nguyen, Chi Van Nguyen, Anh Dat Phua, Jason Li, Andrew Luong, Chinh Quoc |
author_sort | Do, Son Ngoc |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Scores in predicting mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis in a low-income and middle-income country. DESIGN: A multicentre, cross-sectional study. SETTING: A total of 15 adult ICUs throughout Vietnam. PARTICIPANTS: We included all patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to ICUs for sepsis and who were still in ICUs from 00:00 to 23:59 of the specified study days (ie, 9 January, 3 April, 3 July and 9 October of the year 2019). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was hospital all-cause mortality (hospital mortality). We also defined the secondary outcome as all-cause deaths in the ICU (ICU mortality). RESULTS: Of 252 patients, 40.1% died in hospitals, and 33.3% died in ICUs. SOFA Score (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.688 (95% CI 0.618 to 0.758); cut-off value≥7.5; P(AUROC)<0.001) and APACHE II Score (AUROC: 0.689 (95% CI 0.622 to 0.756); cut-off value ≥20.5; P(AUROC)<0.001) both had a poor discriminatory ability for predicting hospital mortality. However, the discriminatory ability for predicting ICU mortality of SOFA (AUROC: 0.713 (95% CI 0.643 to 0.783); cut-off value≥9.5; P(AUROC)<0.001) was fair and was better than that of APACHE II Score (AUROC: 0.672 (95% CI 0.603 to 0.742); cut-off value≥18.5; P(AUROC)<0.001). A SOFA Score≥8 (adjusted OR (AOR): 2.717; 95% CI 1.371 to 5.382) and an APACHE II Score≥21 (AOR: 2.668; 95% CI 1.338 to 5.321) were independently associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality. Additionally, a SOFA Score≥10 (AOR: 2.194; 95% CI 1.017 to 4.735) was an independent predictor of ICU mortality, in contrast to an APACHE II Score≥19, for which this role did not. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SOFA and APACHE II Scores were worthwhile in predicting mortality among ICU patients with sepsis. However, due to better discrimination for predicting ICU mortality, the SOFA Score was preferable to the APACHE II Score in predicting mortality. Clinical trials registry – India: CTRI/2019/01/016898. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10016261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100162612023-03-16 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study Do, Son Ngoc Dao, Co Xuan Nguyen, Tuan Anh Nguyen, My Ha Pham, Dung Thi Nguyen, Nga Thi Huynh, Dai Quang Hoang, Quoc Trong Ai Bui, Cuong Van Vu, Thang Dinh Bui, Ha Nhat Nguyen, Hung Tan Hoang, Hai Bui Le, Thuy Thi Phuong Nguyen, Lien Thi Bao Duong, Phuoc Thien Nguyen, Tuan Dang Le, Vuong Hung Pham, Giang Thi Tra Bui, Giang Thi Huong Bui, Tam Van Pham, Thao Thi Ngoc Nguyen, Chi Van Nguyen, Anh Dat Phua, Jason Li, Andrew Luong, Chinh Quoc BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Scores in predicting mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis in a low-income and middle-income country. DESIGN: A multicentre, cross-sectional study. SETTING: A total of 15 adult ICUs throughout Vietnam. PARTICIPANTS: We included all patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to ICUs for sepsis and who were still in ICUs from 00:00 to 23:59 of the specified study days (ie, 9 January, 3 April, 3 July and 9 October of the year 2019). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was hospital all-cause mortality (hospital mortality). We also defined the secondary outcome as all-cause deaths in the ICU (ICU mortality). RESULTS: Of 252 patients, 40.1% died in hospitals, and 33.3% died in ICUs. SOFA Score (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.688 (95% CI 0.618 to 0.758); cut-off value≥7.5; P(AUROC)<0.001) and APACHE II Score (AUROC: 0.689 (95% CI 0.622 to 0.756); cut-off value ≥20.5; P(AUROC)<0.001) both had a poor discriminatory ability for predicting hospital mortality. However, the discriminatory ability for predicting ICU mortality of SOFA (AUROC: 0.713 (95% CI 0.643 to 0.783); cut-off value≥9.5; P(AUROC)<0.001) was fair and was better than that of APACHE II Score (AUROC: 0.672 (95% CI 0.603 to 0.742); cut-off value≥18.5; P(AUROC)<0.001). A SOFA Score≥8 (adjusted OR (AOR): 2.717; 95% CI 1.371 to 5.382) and an APACHE II Score≥21 (AOR: 2.668; 95% CI 1.338 to 5.321) were independently associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality. Additionally, a SOFA Score≥10 (AOR: 2.194; 95% CI 1.017 to 4.735) was an independent predictor of ICU mortality, in contrast to an APACHE II Score≥19, for which this role did not. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SOFA and APACHE II Scores were worthwhile in predicting mortality among ICU patients with sepsis. However, due to better discrimination for predicting ICU mortality, the SOFA Score was preferable to the APACHE II Score in predicting mortality. Clinical trials registry – India: CTRI/2019/01/016898. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10016261/ /pubmed/36918251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064870 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Do, Son Ngoc Dao, Co Xuan Nguyen, Tuan Anh Nguyen, My Ha Pham, Dung Thi Nguyen, Nga Thi Huynh, Dai Quang Hoang, Quoc Trong Ai Bui, Cuong Van Vu, Thang Dinh Bui, Ha Nhat Nguyen, Hung Tan Hoang, Hai Bui Le, Thuy Thi Phuong Nguyen, Lien Thi Bao Duong, Phuoc Thien Nguyen, Tuan Dang Le, Vuong Hung Pham, Giang Thi Tra Bui, Giang Thi Huong Bui, Tam Van Pham, Thao Thi Ngoc Nguyen, Chi Van Nguyen, Anh Dat Phua, Jason Li, Andrew Luong, Chinh Quoc Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study |
title | Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study |
title_full | Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study |
title_short | Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study |
title_sort | sequential organ failure assessment (sofa) score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dosonngoc sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT daocoxuan sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT nguyentuananh sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT nguyenmyha sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT phamdungthi sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT nguyenngathi sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT huynhdaiquang sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT hoangquoctrongai sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT buicuongvan sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT vuthangdinh sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT buihanhat sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT nguyenhungtan sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT hoanghaibui sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT lethuythiphuong sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT nguyenlienthibao sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT duongphuocthien sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT nguyentuandang sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT levuonghung sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT phamgiangthitra sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT buigiangthihuong sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT buitamvan sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT phamthaothingoc sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT nguyenchivan sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT nguyenanhdat sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT phuajason sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT liandrew sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy AT luongchinhquoc sequentialorganfailureassessmentsofascoreforpredictingmortalityinpatientswithsepsisinvietnameseintensivecareunitsamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy |