Cargando…

Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Dozens of multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) have been published, but none have been incorporated into regular clinical practice. One of the reasons for this lack of adoption is poor model performance due to methodological weaknesses i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fields, Kara G, Ma, Jie, Petrinic, Tatjana, Alhassan, Hassan, Eze, Anthony, Reddy, Ankith, Hedayat, Mona, Providencia, Rui, Lip, Gregory Y H, Bedford, Jonathan P, Clifton, David A, Redfern, Oliver C, O’Brien, Benjamin, Watkinson, Peter J, Collins, Gary S, Muehlschlegel, Jochen D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36914189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067260
_version_ 1784907376531341312
author Fields, Kara G
Ma, Jie
Petrinic, Tatjana
Alhassan, Hassan
Eze, Anthony
Reddy, Ankith
Hedayat, Mona
Providencia, Rui
Lip, Gregory Y H
Bedford, Jonathan P
Clifton, David A
Redfern, Oliver C
O’Brien, Benjamin
Watkinson, Peter J
Collins, Gary S
Muehlschlegel, Jochen D
author_facet Fields, Kara G
Ma, Jie
Petrinic, Tatjana
Alhassan, Hassan
Eze, Anthony
Reddy, Ankith
Hedayat, Mona
Providencia, Rui
Lip, Gregory Y H
Bedford, Jonathan P
Clifton, David A
Redfern, Oliver C
O’Brien, Benjamin
Watkinson, Peter J
Collins, Gary S
Muehlschlegel, Jochen D
author_sort Fields, Kara G
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dozens of multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) have been published, but none have been incorporated into regular clinical practice. One of the reasons for this lack of adoption is poor model performance due to methodological weaknesses in model development. In addition, there has been little external validation of these existing models to evaluate their reproducibility and transportability. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise the methodology and risk of bias of papers presenting the development and/or validation of models for AFACS. METHODS: We will identify studies that present the development and/or validation of a multivariable prediction model for AFACS through searches of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception to 31 December 2021. Pairs of reviewers will independently extract model performance measures, assess methodological quality and assess risk of bias of included studies using extraction forms adapted from a combination of the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Extracted information will be reported by narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systemic review will only include published aggregate data, so no protected health information will be used. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference presentations. Further, this review will identify weaknesses in past AFACS prediction model development and validation methodology so that subsequent studies can improve upon prior practices and produce a clinically useful risk estimation tool. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019127329.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10016290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100162902023-03-16 Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol Fields, Kara G Ma, Jie Petrinic, Tatjana Alhassan, Hassan Eze, Anthony Reddy, Ankith Hedayat, Mona Providencia, Rui Lip, Gregory Y H Bedford, Jonathan P Clifton, David A Redfern, Oliver C O’Brien, Benjamin Watkinson, Peter J Collins, Gary S Muehlschlegel, Jochen D BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Dozens of multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) have been published, but none have been incorporated into regular clinical practice. One of the reasons for this lack of adoption is poor model performance due to methodological weaknesses in model development. In addition, there has been little external validation of these existing models to evaluate their reproducibility and transportability. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise the methodology and risk of bias of papers presenting the development and/or validation of models for AFACS. METHODS: We will identify studies that present the development and/or validation of a multivariable prediction model for AFACS through searches of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception to 31 December 2021. Pairs of reviewers will independently extract model performance measures, assess methodological quality and assess risk of bias of included studies using extraction forms adapted from a combination of the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Extracted information will be reported by narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systemic review will only include published aggregate data, so no protected health information will be used. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference presentations. Further, this review will identify weaknesses in past AFACS prediction model development and validation methodology so that subsequent studies can improve upon prior practices and produce a clinically useful risk estimation tool. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019127329. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10016290/ /pubmed/36914189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067260 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Fields, Kara G
Ma, Jie
Petrinic, Tatjana
Alhassan, Hassan
Eze, Anthony
Reddy, Ankith
Hedayat, Mona
Providencia, Rui
Lip, Gregory Y H
Bedford, Jonathan P
Clifton, David A
Redfern, Oliver C
O’Brien, Benjamin
Watkinson, Peter J
Collins, Gary S
Muehlschlegel, Jochen D
Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol
title Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol
title_full Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol
title_short Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol
title_sort multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36914189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067260
work_keys_str_mv AT fieldskarag multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT majie multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT petrinictatjana multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT alhassanhassan multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT ezeanthony multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT reddyankith multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT hedayatmona multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT providenciarui multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT lipgregoryyh multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT bedfordjonathanp multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT cliftondavida multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT redfernoliverc multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT obrienbenjamin multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT watkinsonpeterj multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT collinsgarys multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol
AT muehlschlegeljochend multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol