Cargando…
Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Dozens of multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) have been published, but none have been incorporated into regular clinical practice. One of the reasons for this lack of adoption is poor model performance due to methodological weaknesses i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36914189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067260 |
_version_ | 1784907376531341312 |
---|---|
author | Fields, Kara G Ma, Jie Petrinic, Tatjana Alhassan, Hassan Eze, Anthony Reddy, Ankith Hedayat, Mona Providencia, Rui Lip, Gregory Y H Bedford, Jonathan P Clifton, David A Redfern, Oliver C O’Brien, Benjamin Watkinson, Peter J Collins, Gary S Muehlschlegel, Jochen D |
author_facet | Fields, Kara G Ma, Jie Petrinic, Tatjana Alhassan, Hassan Eze, Anthony Reddy, Ankith Hedayat, Mona Providencia, Rui Lip, Gregory Y H Bedford, Jonathan P Clifton, David A Redfern, Oliver C O’Brien, Benjamin Watkinson, Peter J Collins, Gary S Muehlschlegel, Jochen D |
author_sort | Fields, Kara G |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Dozens of multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) have been published, but none have been incorporated into regular clinical practice. One of the reasons for this lack of adoption is poor model performance due to methodological weaknesses in model development. In addition, there has been little external validation of these existing models to evaluate their reproducibility and transportability. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise the methodology and risk of bias of papers presenting the development and/or validation of models for AFACS. METHODS: We will identify studies that present the development and/or validation of a multivariable prediction model for AFACS through searches of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception to 31 December 2021. Pairs of reviewers will independently extract model performance measures, assess methodological quality and assess risk of bias of included studies using extraction forms adapted from a combination of the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Extracted information will be reported by narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systemic review will only include published aggregate data, so no protected health information will be used. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference presentations. Further, this review will identify weaknesses in past AFACS prediction model development and validation methodology so that subsequent studies can improve upon prior practices and produce a clinically useful risk estimation tool. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019127329. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10016290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100162902023-03-16 Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol Fields, Kara G Ma, Jie Petrinic, Tatjana Alhassan, Hassan Eze, Anthony Reddy, Ankith Hedayat, Mona Providencia, Rui Lip, Gregory Y H Bedford, Jonathan P Clifton, David A Redfern, Oliver C O’Brien, Benjamin Watkinson, Peter J Collins, Gary S Muehlschlegel, Jochen D BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Dozens of multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) have been published, but none have been incorporated into regular clinical practice. One of the reasons for this lack of adoption is poor model performance due to methodological weaknesses in model development. In addition, there has been little external validation of these existing models to evaluate their reproducibility and transportability. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise the methodology and risk of bias of papers presenting the development and/or validation of models for AFACS. METHODS: We will identify studies that present the development and/or validation of a multivariable prediction model for AFACS through searches of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception to 31 December 2021. Pairs of reviewers will independently extract model performance measures, assess methodological quality and assess risk of bias of included studies using extraction forms adapted from a combination of the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Extracted information will be reported by narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systemic review will only include published aggregate data, so no protected health information will be used. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference presentations. Further, this review will identify weaknesses in past AFACS prediction model development and validation methodology so that subsequent studies can improve upon prior practices and produce a clinically useful risk estimation tool. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019127329. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10016290/ /pubmed/36914189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067260 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Fields, Kara G Ma, Jie Petrinic, Tatjana Alhassan, Hassan Eze, Anthony Reddy, Ankith Hedayat, Mona Providencia, Rui Lip, Gregory Y H Bedford, Jonathan P Clifton, David A Redfern, Oliver C O’Brien, Benjamin Watkinson, Peter J Collins, Gary S Muehlschlegel, Jochen D Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol |
title | Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol |
title_full | Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol |
title_short | Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort | multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36914189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fieldskarag multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT majie multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT petrinictatjana multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT alhassanhassan multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT ezeanthony multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT reddyankith multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT hedayatmona multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT providenciarui multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT lipgregoryyh multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT bedfordjonathanp multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT cliftondavida multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT redfernoliverc multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT obrienbenjamin multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT watkinsonpeterj multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT collinsgarys multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol AT muehlschlegeljochend multivariablepredictionmodelsforatrialfibrillationaftercardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewprotocol |