Cargando…

Intraindividual variance of lower limb rotation in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE: To determine the side-to-side difference in intraindividual rotation alignment of patients with bilateral varus-type knee osteoarthritis (OA) and compare it with control subjects. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 60 patients with bilateral varus-type knee OA and 50 control subject...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Xin, Wang, Yang-yu-fan, Jin, Wang-yi, Huang, Chao-ran, Yan, Zi-wen, Peng, Da-lin, Zhou, Shen, Guo, Kai-jin, Pan, Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936650
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.964160
_version_ 1784907390042243072
author Zheng, Xin
Wang, Yang-yu-fan
Jin, Wang-yi
Huang, Chao-ran
Yan, Zi-wen
Peng, Da-lin
Zhou, Shen
Guo, Kai-jin
Pan, Sheng
author_facet Zheng, Xin
Wang, Yang-yu-fan
Jin, Wang-yi
Huang, Chao-ran
Yan, Zi-wen
Peng, Da-lin
Zhou, Shen
Guo, Kai-jin
Pan, Sheng
author_sort Zheng, Xin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the side-to-side difference in intraindividual rotation alignment of patients with bilateral varus-type knee osteoarthritis (OA) and compare it with control subjects. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 60 patients with bilateral varus-type knee OA and 50 control subjects. All cases underwent bilateral lower limb CT angiography. Bilateral femoral and tibial rotation alignment were measured, and the overall lower limb rotation was calculated by two different methods. Method 1 was calculated by subtracting angle of the femoral torsion from the tibial torsion and method 2 was determined by relative rotation of the femoral neck angle to bimalleolar angle. The intraindividual variance and differences between the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Both OA and control samples showed significant differences between right and left for all measurements. Femoral torsion for control group was 10.4 ± 5.5°, tibial torsion was −22.1 ± 6.1°, and overall leg rotation by method 1 was −15.6 ± 7.2° and method 2 was −11.7 ± 8.2°. Femoral torsion, tibial torsion, method 1, and method 2 in the patients with OA were 8.2 ± 6.3°, −18.6 ± 4.1°, −14.9 ± 7.9°, and −10.4 ± 7.6°, respectively. Patients with OA showed a more pronounced retroversion in the femur (p = 0.008) and more internal rotation in the tibia (p < 0.001). No statistical significance of both methods was found between the two groups. Patients with OA had a greater median side-to-side absolute difference in all measurements, though the differences of both two methods of overall lower limb rotation were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The discrepancy of side-to-side differences of bilateral lower limb rotation ought to be noticed with caution in diagnosing and treating rotational deformities of the lower limb, especially for patients with bilateral knee OA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10016351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100163512023-03-16 Intraindividual variance of lower limb rotation in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis Zheng, Xin Wang, Yang-yu-fan Jin, Wang-yi Huang, Chao-ran Yan, Zi-wen Peng, Da-lin Zhou, Shen Guo, Kai-jin Pan, Sheng Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: To determine the side-to-side difference in intraindividual rotation alignment of patients with bilateral varus-type knee osteoarthritis (OA) and compare it with control subjects. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 60 patients with bilateral varus-type knee OA and 50 control subjects. All cases underwent bilateral lower limb CT angiography. Bilateral femoral and tibial rotation alignment were measured, and the overall lower limb rotation was calculated by two different methods. Method 1 was calculated by subtracting angle of the femoral torsion from the tibial torsion and method 2 was determined by relative rotation of the femoral neck angle to bimalleolar angle. The intraindividual variance and differences between the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Both OA and control samples showed significant differences between right and left for all measurements. Femoral torsion for control group was 10.4 ± 5.5°, tibial torsion was −22.1 ± 6.1°, and overall leg rotation by method 1 was −15.6 ± 7.2° and method 2 was −11.7 ± 8.2°. Femoral torsion, tibial torsion, method 1, and method 2 in the patients with OA were 8.2 ± 6.3°, −18.6 ± 4.1°, −14.9 ± 7.9°, and −10.4 ± 7.6°, respectively. Patients with OA showed a more pronounced retroversion in the femur (p = 0.008) and more internal rotation in the tibia (p < 0.001). No statistical significance of both methods was found between the two groups. Patients with OA had a greater median side-to-side absolute difference in all measurements, though the differences of both two methods of overall lower limb rotation were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The discrepancy of side-to-side differences of bilateral lower limb rotation ought to be noticed with caution in diagnosing and treating rotational deformities of the lower limb, especially for patients with bilateral knee OA. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10016351/ /pubmed/36936650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.964160 Text en © 2023 Zheng, Wang, Jin, Huang, Yan, Peng, Zhou, Guo and Pan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Zheng, Xin
Wang, Yang-yu-fan
Jin, Wang-yi
Huang, Chao-ran
Yan, Zi-wen
Peng, Da-lin
Zhou, Shen
Guo, Kai-jin
Pan, Sheng
Intraindividual variance of lower limb rotation in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis
title Intraindividual variance of lower limb rotation in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis
title_full Intraindividual variance of lower limb rotation in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Intraindividual variance of lower limb rotation in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Intraindividual variance of lower limb rotation in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis
title_short Intraindividual variance of lower limb rotation in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis
title_sort intraindividual variance of lower limb rotation in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936650
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.964160
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengxin intraindividualvarianceoflowerlimbrotationinpatientswithbilateralkneeosteoarthritis
AT wangyangyufan intraindividualvarianceoflowerlimbrotationinpatientswithbilateralkneeosteoarthritis
AT jinwangyi intraindividualvarianceoflowerlimbrotationinpatientswithbilateralkneeosteoarthritis
AT huangchaoran intraindividualvarianceoflowerlimbrotationinpatientswithbilateralkneeosteoarthritis
AT yanziwen intraindividualvarianceoflowerlimbrotationinpatientswithbilateralkneeosteoarthritis
AT pengdalin intraindividualvarianceoflowerlimbrotationinpatientswithbilateralkneeosteoarthritis
AT zhoushen intraindividualvarianceoflowerlimbrotationinpatientswithbilateralkneeosteoarthritis
AT guokaijin intraindividualvarianceoflowerlimbrotationinpatientswithbilateralkneeosteoarthritis
AT pansheng intraindividualvarianceoflowerlimbrotationinpatientswithbilateralkneeosteoarthritis