Cargando…

Association of surgeons’ gender with elective surgical lists in the State of Florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads

BACKGROUND: A recent publication reported that at three hospitals within one academic health system, female surgeons received less surgical block time than male surgeons, suggesting potential gender-based bias in operating room scheduling. We examined this observation’s generalizability. METHODS: Ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dexter, Franklin, Epstein, Richard H., Fahy, Brenda G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36920948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283033
_version_ 1784907450000867328
author Dexter, Franklin
Epstein, Richard H.
Fahy, Brenda G.
author_facet Dexter, Franklin
Epstein, Richard H.
Fahy, Brenda G.
author_sort Dexter, Franklin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A recent publication reported that at three hospitals within one academic health system, female surgeons received less surgical block time than male surgeons, suggesting potential gender-based bias in operating room scheduling. We examined this observation’s generalizability. METHODS: Our cross-sectional retrospective cohort study of State of Florida administrative data included all 4,176,551 ambulatory procedural encounters and inpatient elective surgical cases performed January 2017 through December 2019 by 8875 surgeons (1830 female) at all 609 non-federal hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers. There were 1,509,190 lists of cases (i.e., combinations of the same surgeon, facility, and date). Logistic regression adjusted for covariables of decile of surgeon’s quarterly cases, surgeon’s specialty, quarter, and facility. RESULTS: Selecting randomly a male and a female surgeons’ quarter, for 66% of selections, the male surgeon performed more cases (P < .0001). Without adjustment for quarterly caseloads, lists comprised one case for 44.2% of male and 54.6% of female surgeons (difference 10.4%, P < .0001). A similar result held for lists with one or two cases (difference 9.1%, P < .0001). However, incorporating quarterly operative caseloads, the direction of the observed difference between male and female surgeons was reversed both for case lists with one (-2.1%, P = .03) or one or two cases (-1.8%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the aforementioned single university health system results but show that the differences between male and female surgeons in their lists were not due to systematic bias in operating room scheduling (e.g., completing three brief elective cases in a week on three different workdays) but in their total case numbers. The finding that surgeons performing lists comprising a single case were more often female than male provides a previously unrecognized reason why operating room managers should help facilitate the workload of surgeons performing only one case on operative (anesthesia) workdays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10016664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100166642023-03-16 Association of surgeons’ gender with elective surgical lists in the State of Florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads Dexter, Franklin Epstein, Richard H. Fahy, Brenda G. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A recent publication reported that at three hospitals within one academic health system, female surgeons received less surgical block time than male surgeons, suggesting potential gender-based bias in operating room scheduling. We examined this observation’s generalizability. METHODS: Our cross-sectional retrospective cohort study of State of Florida administrative data included all 4,176,551 ambulatory procedural encounters and inpatient elective surgical cases performed January 2017 through December 2019 by 8875 surgeons (1830 female) at all 609 non-federal hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers. There were 1,509,190 lists of cases (i.e., combinations of the same surgeon, facility, and date). Logistic regression adjusted for covariables of decile of surgeon’s quarterly cases, surgeon’s specialty, quarter, and facility. RESULTS: Selecting randomly a male and a female surgeons’ quarter, for 66% of selections, the male surgeon performed more cases (P < .0001). Without adjustment for quarterly caseloads, lists comprised one case for 44.2% of male and 54.6% of female surgeons (difference 10.4%, P < .0001). A similar result held for lists with one or two cases (difference 9.1%, P < .0001). However, incorporating quarterly operative caseloads, the direction of the observed difference between male and female surgeons was reversed both for case lists with one (-2.1%, P = .03) or one or two cases (-1.8%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the aforementioned single university health system results but show that the differences between male and female surgeons in their lists were not due to systematic bias in operating room scheduling (e.g., completing three brief elective cases in a week on three different workdays) but in their total case numbers. The finding that surgeons performing lists comprising a single case were more often female than male provides a previously unrecognized reason why operating room managers should help facilitate the workload of surgeons performing only one case on operative (anesthesia) workdays. Public Library of Science 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10016664/ /pubmed/36920948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283033 Text en © 2023 Dexter et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dexter, Franklin
Epstein, Richard H.
Fahy, Brenda G.
Association of surgeons’ gender with elective surgical lists in the State of Florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads
title Association of surgeons’ gender with elective surgical lists in the State of Florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads
title_full Association of surgeons’ gender with elective surgical lists in the State of Florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads
title_fullStr Association of surgeons’ gender with elective surgical lists in the State of Florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads
title_full_unstemmed Association of surgeons’ gender with elective surgical lists in the State of Florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads
title_short Association of surgeons’ gender with elective surgical lists in the State of Florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads
title_sort association of surgeons’ gender with elective surgical lists in the state of florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36920948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283033
work_keys_str_mv AT dexterfranklin associationofsurgeonsgenderwithelectivesurgicallistsinthestateoffloridaisexplainedbydifferencesinmeanoperativecaseloads
AT epsteinrichardh associationofsurgeonsgenderwithelectivesurgicallistsinthestateoffloridaisexplainedbydifferencesinmeanoperativecaseloads
AT fahybrendag associationofsurgeonsgenderwithelectivesurgicallistsinthestateoffloridaisexplainedbydifferencesinmeanoperativecaseloads