Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Many options for third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GEJC) have been developed. Therapies including immunotherapy (nivolumab), chemotherapy (irinotecan, FTD/TPI), targeted therapy (apatinib), and antibody drug conjugates (ADC) have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chan, Xiang, Yaoxian, Wang, Jing, Yan, Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937403
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1118820
_version_ 1784907455914835968
author Zhang, Chan
Xiang, Yaoxian
Wang, Jing
Yan, Dong
author_facet Zhang, Chan
Xiang, Yaoxian
Wang, Jing
Yan, Dong
author_sort Zhang, Chan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many options for third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GEJC) have been developed. Therapies including immunotherapy (nivolumab), chemotherapy (irinotecan, FTD/TPI), targeted therapy (apatinib), and antibody drug conjugates (ADC) have shown to increase the survival rates in patients, but few studies have compared the relative efficacy of these treatments. Here, we compared the efficacies of these regimens using network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide guides in selecting the best regimen and formulating a precise individualized treatment plan. METHODS: The published RCTs of phase II/III in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched. The median overall survival (mOS) was the primary outcome of NMA, and the other outcomes were median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR) (proportion of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD)) and incidence of grade 3 or above adverse events (≥3AEs). RESULTS: Five phase II/III RCTs involving 1674 patients and 7 treatment regimens were analyzed. It showed that Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (DS-8201) prolonged the OS of patients significantly comparing with chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.89) for the overall population. DS-8201 (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17-0.42) and chemotherapy (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.7) improved the PFS significantly over nivolumab. Apatinib (RR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.65-5.95) and DS-8201 (RR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.51-4.83) were more effective than nivolumab in improving DCR. DS-8201 achieved greater OS benefits compared to chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.88) for patients who were HER2-positive. We ranked the Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve according to OS benefit, and showed that ADC ranked first for the general patient population and for patients with a HER2-positive diagnosis, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. For patients with GEJC, nivolumab ranked first. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab, apatinib, chemotherapy, and ADC all improved the OS of GC/GEJC patients significantly. ADC may be the best option for the overall population of GC, as well as for patients with HER2-overexpression, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. Nivolumab may be the first treatment option for GEJC patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42022364714.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10016689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100166892023-03-16 Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Zhang, Chan Xiang, Yaoxian Wang, Jing Yan, Dong Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Many options for third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GEJC) have been developed. Therapies including immunotherapy (nivolumab), chemotherapy (irinotecan, FTD/TPI), targeted therapy (apatinib), and antibody drug conjugates (ADC) have shown to increase the survival rates in patients, but few studies have compared the relative efficacy of these treatments. Here, we compared the efficacies of these regimens using network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide guides in selecting the best regimen and formulating a precise individualized treatment plan. METHODS: The published RCTs of phase II/III in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched. The median overall survival (mOS) was the primary outcome of NMA, and the other outcomes were median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR) (proportion of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD)) and incidence of grade 3 or above adverse events (≥3AEs). RESULTS: Five phase II/III RCTs involving 1674 patients and 7 treatment regimens were analyzed. It showed that Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (DS-8201) prolonged the OS of patients significantly comparing with chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.89) for the overall population. DS-8201 (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17-0.42) and chemotherapy (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.7) improved the PFS significantly over nivolumab. Apatinib (RR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.65-5.95) and DS-8201 (RR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.51-4.83) were more effective than nivolumab in improving DCR. DS-8201 achieved greater OS benefits compared to chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.88) for patients who were HER2-positive. We ranked the Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve according to OS benefit, and showed that ADC ranked first for the general patient population and for patients with a HER2-positive diagnosis, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. For patients with GEJC, nivolumab ranked first. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab, apatinib, chemotherapy, and ADC all improved the OS of GC/GEJC patients significantly. ADC may be the best option for the overall population of GC, as well as for patients with HER2-overexpression, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. Nivolumab may be the first treatment option for GEJC patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42022364714. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10016689/ /pubmed/36937403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1118820 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Xiang, Wang and Yan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Chan
Xiang, Yaoxian
Wang, Jing
Yan, Dong
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937403
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1118820
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofthirdlinetreatmentsforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xiangyaoxian comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofthirdlinetreatmentsforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangjing comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofthirdlinetreatmentsforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yandong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofthirdlinetreatmentsforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis