Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Many options for third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GEJC) have been developed. Therapies including immunotherapy (nivolumab), chemotherapy (irinotecan, FTD/TPI), targeted therapy (apatinib), and antibody drug conjugates (ADC) have...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1118820 |
_version_ | 1784907455914835968 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Chan Xiang, Yaoxian Wang, Jing Yan, Dong |
author_facet | Zhang, Chan Xiang, Yaoxian Wang, Jing Yan, Dong |
author_sort | Zhang, Chan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many options for third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GEJC) have been developed. Therapies including immunotherapy (nivolumab), chemotherapy (irinotecan, FTD/TPI), targeted therapy (apatinib), and antibody drug conjugates (ADC) have shown to increase the survival rates in patients, but few studies have compared the relative efficacy of these treatments. Here, we compared the efficacies of these regimens using network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide guides in selecting the best regimen and formulating a precise individualized treatment plan. METHODS: The published RCTs of phase II/III in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched. The median overall survival (mOS) was the primary outcome of NMA, and the other outcomes were median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR) (proportion of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD)) and incidence of grade 3 or above adverse events (≥3AEs). RESULTS: Five phase II/III RCTs involving 1674 patients and 7 treatment regimens were analyzed. It showed that Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (DS-8201) prolonged the OS of patients significantly comparing with chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.89) for the overall population. DS-8201 (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17-0.42) and chemotherapy (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.7) improved the PFS significantly over nivolumab. Apatinib (RR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.65-5.95) and DS-8201 (RR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.51-4.83) were more effective than nivolumab in improving DCR. DS-8201 achieved greater OS benefits compared to chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.88) for patients who were HER2-positive. We ranked the Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve according to OS benefit, and showed that ADC ranked first for the general patient population and for patients with a HER2-positive diagnosis, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. For patients with GEJC, nivolumab ranked first. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab, apatinib, chemotherapy, and ADC all improved the OS of GC/GEJC patients significantly. ADC may be the best option for the overall population of GC, as well as for patients with HER2-overexpression, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. Nivolumab may be the first treatment option for GEJC patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42022364714. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10016689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100166892023-03-16 Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Zhang, Chan Xiang, Yaoxian Wang, Jing Yan, Dong Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Many options for third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GEJC) have been developed. Therapies including immunotherapy (nivolumab), chemotherapy (irinotecan, FTD/TPI), targeted therapy (apatinib), and antibody drug conjugates (ADC) have shown to increase the survival rates in patients, but few studies have compared the relative efficacy of these treatments. Here, we compared the efficacies of these regimens using network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide guides in selecting the best regimen and formulating a precise individualized treatment plan. METHODS: The published RCTs of phase II/III in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched. The median overall survival (mOS) was the primary outcome of NMA, and the other outcomes were median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR) (proportion of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD)) and incidence of grade 3 or above adverse events (≥3AEs). RESULTS: Five phase II/III RCTs involving 1674 patients and 7 treatment regimens were analyzed. It showed that Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (DS-8201) prolonged the OS of patients significantly comparing with chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.89) for the overall population. DS-8201 (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17-0.42) and chemotherapy (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.7) improved the PFS significantly over nivolumab. Apatinib (RR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.65-5.95) and DS-8201 (RR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.51-4.83) were more effective than nivolumab in improving DCR. DS-8201 achieved greater OS benefits compared to chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.88) for patients who were HER2-positive. We ranked the Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve according to OS benefit, and showed that ADC ranked first for the general patient population and for patients with a HER2-positive diagnosis, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. For patients with GEJC, nivolumab ranked first. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab, apatinib, chemotherapy, and ADC all improved the OS of GC/GEJC patients significantly. ADC may be the best option for the overall population of GC, as well as for patients with HER2-overexpression, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. Nivolumab may be the first treatment option for GEJC patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42022364714. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10016689/ /pubmed/36937403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1118820 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Xiang, Wang and Yan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Zhang, Chan Xiang, Yaoxian Wang, Jing Yan, Dong Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1118820 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangchan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofthirdlinetreatmentsforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xiangyaoxian comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofthirdlinetreatmentsforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangjing comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofthirdlinetreatmentsforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yandong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofthirdlinetreatmentsforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |