Cargando…
Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection
Twitter location inference methods are developed with the purpose of increasing the percentage of geotagged tweets by inferring locations on a non-geotagged dataset. For validation of proposed approaches, these location inference methods are developed on a fully geotagged dataset on which the attach...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36921000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282942 |
_version_ | 1784907460626087936 |
---|---|
author | Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe Resch, Bernd Havas, Clemens Rudolf |
author_facet | Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe Resch, Bernd Havas, Clemens Rudolf |
author_sort | Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Twitter location inference methods are developed with the purpose of increasing the percentage of geotagged tweets by inferring locations on a non-geotagged dataset. For validation of proposed approaches, these location inference methods are developed on a fully geotagged dataset on which the attached Global Navigation Satellite System coordinates are used as ground truth data. Whilst a substantial number of location inference methods have been developed to date, questions arise pertaining the generalizability of the developed location inference models on a non-geotagged dataset. This paper proposes a high precision location inference method for inferring tweets’ point of origin based on location mentions within the tweet text. We investigate the influence of data selection by comparing the model performance on two datasets. For the first dataset, we use a proportionate sample of tweet sources of a geotagged dataset. For the second dataset, we use a modelled distribution of tweet sources following a non-geotagged dataset. Our results showed that the distribution of tweet sources influences the performance of location inference models. Using the first dataset we outweighed state-of-the-art location extraction models by inferring 61.9%, 86.1% and 92.1% of the extracted locations within 1 km, 10 km and 50 km radius values, respectively. However, using the second dataset our precision values dropped to 45.3%, 73.1% and 81.0% for the same radius values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10016707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100167072023-03-16 Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe Resch, Bernd Havas, Clemens Rudolf PLoS One Research Article Twitter location inference methods are developed with the purpose of increasing the percentage of geotagged tweets by inferring locations on a non-geotagged dataset. For validation of proposed approaches, these location inference methods are developed on a fully geotagged dataset on which the attached Global Navigation Satellite System coordinates are used as ground truth data. Whilst a substantial number of location inference methods have been developed to date, questions arise pertaining the generalizability of the developed location inference models on a non-geotagged dataset. This paper proposes a high precision location inference method for inferring tweets’ point of origin based on location mentions within the tweet text. We investigate the influence of data selection by comparing the model performance on two datasets. For the first dataset, we use a proportionate sample of tweet sources of a geotagged dataset. For the second dataset, we use a modelled distribution of tweet sources following a non-geotagged dataset. Our results showed that the distribution of tweet sources influences the performance of location inference models. Using the first dataset we outweighed state-of-the-art location extraction models by inferring 61.9%, 86.1% and 92.1% of the extracted locations within 1 km, 10 km and 50 km radius values, respectively. However, using the second dataset our precision values dropped to 45.3%, 73.1% and 81.0% for the same radius values. Public Library of Science 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10016707/ /pubmed/36921000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282942 Text en © 2023 Serere et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe Resch, Bernd Havas, Clemens Rudolf Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection |
title | Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection |
title_full | Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection |
title_fullStr | Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection |
title_short | Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection |
title_sort | enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spacy, nominatim and google maps. a comparative analysis of the influence of data selection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36921000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sererehelenngonidzashe enhancedgeocodingprecisionforlocationinferenceoftweettextusingspacynominatimandgooglemapsacomparativeanalysisoftheinfluenceofdataselection AT reschbernd enhancedgeocodingprecisionforlocationinferenceoftweettextusingspacynominatimandgooglemapsacomparativeanalysisoftheinfluenceofdataselection AT havasclemensrudolf enhancedgeocodingprecisionforlocationinferenceoftweettextusingspacynominatimandgooglemapsacomparativeanalysisoftheinfluenceofdataselection |