Cargando…

Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection

Twitter location inference methods are developed with the purpose of increasing the percentage of geotagged tweets by inferring locations on a non-geotagged dataset. For validation of proposed approaches, these location inference methods are developed on a fully geotagged dataset on which the attach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe, Resch, Bernd, Havas, Clemens Rudolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36921000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282942
_version_ 1784907460626087936
author Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe
Resch, Bernd
Havas, Clemens Rudolf
author_facet Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe
Resch, Bernd
Havas, Clemens Rudolf
author_sort Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe
collection PubMed
description Twitter location inference methods are developed with the purpose of increasing the percentage of geotagged tweets by inferring locations on a non-geotagged dataset. For validation of proposed approaches, these location inference methods are developed on a fully geotagged dataset on which the attached Global Navigation Satellite System coordinates are used as ground truth data. Whilst a substantial number of location inference methods have been developed to date, questions arise pertaining the generalizability of the developed location inference models on a non-geotagged dataset. This paper proposes a high precision location inference method for inferring tweets’ point of origin based on location mentions within the tweet text. We investigate the influence of data selection by comparing the model performance on two datasets. For the first dataset, we use a proportionate sample of tweet sources of a geotagged dataset. For the second dataset, we use a modelled distribution of tweet sources following a non-geotagged dataset. Our results showed that the distribution of tweet sources influences the performance of location inference models. Using the first dataset we outweighed state-of-the-art location extraction models by inferring 61.9%, 86.1% and 92.1% of the extracted locations within 1 km, 10 km and 50 km radius values, respectively. However, using the second dataset our precision values dropped to 45.3%, 73.1% and 81.0% for the same radius values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10016707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100167072023-03-16 Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe Resch, Bernd Havas, Clemens Rudolf PLoS One Research Article Twitter location inference methods are developed with the purpose of increasing the percentage of geotagged tweets by inferring locations on a non-geotagged dataset. For validation of proposed approaches, these location inference methods are developed on a fully geotagged dataset on which the attached Global Navigation Satellite System coordinates are used as ground truth data. Whilst a substantial number of location inference methods have been developed to date, questions arise pertaining the generalizability of the developed location inference models on a non-geotagged dataset. This paper proposes a high precision location inference method for inferring tweets’ point of origin based on location mentions within the tweet text. We investigate the influence of data selection by comparing the model performance on two datasets. For the first dataset, we use a proportionate sample of tweet sources of a geotagged dataset. For the second dataset, we use a modelled distribution of tweet sources following a non-geotagged dataset. Our results showed that the distribution of tweet sources influences the performance of location inference models. Using the first dataset we outweighed state-of-the-art location extraction models by inferring 61.9%, 86.1% and 92.1% of the extracted locations within 1 km, 10 km and 50 km radius values, respectively. However, using the second dataset our precision values dropped to 45.3%, 73.1% and 81.0% for the same radius values. Public Library of Science 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10016707/ /pubmed/36921000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282942 Text en © 2023 Serere et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Serere, Helen Ngonidzashe
Resch, Bernd
Havas, Clemens Rudolf
Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection
title Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection
title_full Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection
title_fullStr Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection
title_short Enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spaCy, Nominatim and Google Maps. A comparative analysis of the influence of data selection
title_sort enhanced geocoding precision for location inference of tweet text using spacy, nominatim and google maps. a comparative analysis of the influence of data selection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36921000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282942
work_keys_str_mv AT sererehelenngonidzashe enhancedgeocodingprecisionforlocationinferenceoftweettextusingspacynominatimandgooglemapsacomparativeanalysisoftheinfluenceofdataselection
AT reschbernd enhancedgeocodingprecisionforlocationinferenceoftweettextusingspacynominatimandgooglemapsacomparativeanalysisoftheinfluenceofdataselection
AT havasclemensrudolf enhancedgeocodingprecisionforlocationinferenceoftweettextusingspacynominatimandgooglemapsacomparativeanalysisoftheinfluenceofdataselection