Cargando…
The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices
AIMS: Remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is well established in clinical routine and recommended by current guidelines. Nevertheless, data regarding patients’ perceptions are limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patient perspectives on th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123848 |
_version_ | 1784907582209523712 |
---|---|
author | Hillmann, Henrike A. K. Hansen, Claudius Przibille, Oliver Duncker, David |
author_facet | Hillmann, Henrike A. K. Hansen, Claudius Przibille, Oliver Duncker, David |
author_sort | Hillmann, Henrike A. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is well established in clinical routine and recommended by current guidelines. Nevertheless, data regarding patients’ perceptions are limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patient perspectives on the remote monitoring of cardiac devices in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with CIEDs and remote monitoring of all current manufacturers from three German centers were asked to participate. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions regarding the patients’ individual use and perspectives on remote monitoring. Survey participation was anonymous and on a voluntary basis. A total of 617 patients (71.6% men) participated. Most patients reported feeling well informed (69.3%) and reported having unchanged or improved coping (98.8%) since the start of remote monitoring. At least 39.7% of patients experienced technical problems regarding the transmitter, whereas most patients (60.3%) reported that they never noted technical issues. Older patients had significantly less interest than younger patients in using their own smartphones for data transfer (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with remote follow-up of CIED reported that they felt well informed about the remote monitoring approach. Remote monitoring can support coping with their disease. With remote monitoring, patients experienced a prolongation of intervals of in-person follow-up visits, and especially younger patients would appreciate smartphone-based data transfer of their CIEDs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10017432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100174322023-03-17 The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices Hillmann, Henrike A. K. Hansen, Claudius Przibille, Oliver Duncker, David Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine AIMS: Remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is well established in clinical routine and recommended by current guidelines. Nevertheless, data regarding patients’ perceptions are limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patient perspectives on the remote monitoring of cardiac devices in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with CIEDs and remote monitoring of all current manufacturers from three German centers were asked to participate. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions regarding the patients’ individual use and perspectives on remote monitoring. Survey participation was anonymous and on a voluntary basis. A total of 617 patients (71.6% men) participated. Most patients reported feeling well informed (69.3%) and reported having unchanged or improved coping (98.8%) since the start of remote monitoring. At least 39.7% of patients experienced technical problems regarding the transmitter, whereas most patients (60.3%) reported that they never noted technical issues. Older patients had significantly less interest than younger patients in using their own smartphones for data transfer (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with remote follow-up of CIED reported that they felt well informed about the remote monitoring approach. Remote monitoring can support coping with their disease. With remote monitoring, patients experienced a prolongation of intervals of in-person follow-up visits, and especially younger patients would appreciate smartphone-based data transfer of their CIEDs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10017432/ /pubmed/36937908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123848 Text en Copyright © 2023 Hillmann, Hansen, Przibille and Duncker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Hillmann, Henrike A. K. Hansen, Claudius Przibille, Oliver Duncker, David The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices |
title | The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices |
title_full | The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices |
title_fullStr | The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices |
title_full_unstemmed | The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices |
title_short | The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices |
title_sort | patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123848 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillmannhenrikeak thepatientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices AT hansenclaudius thepatientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices AT przibilleoliver thepatientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices AT dunckerdavid thepatientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices AT hillmannhenrikeak patientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices AT hansenclaudius patientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices AT przibilleoliver patientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices AT dunckerdavid patientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices |