Cargando…

The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices

AIMS: Remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is well established in clinical routine and recommended by current guidelines. Nevertheless, data regarding patients’ perceptions are limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patient perspectives on th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hillmann, Henrike A. K., Hansen, Claudius, Przibille, Oliver, Duncker, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123848
_version_ 1784907582209523712
author Hillmann, Henrike A. K.
Hansen, Claudius
Przibille, Oliver
Duncker, David
author_facet Hillmann, Henrike A. K.
Hansen, Claudius
Przibille, Oliver
Duncker, David
author_sort Hillmann, Henrike A. K.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is well established in clinical routine and recommended by current guidelines. Nevertheless, data regarding patients’ perceptions are limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patient perspectives on the remote monitoring of cardiac devices in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with CIEDs and remote monitoring of all current manufacturers from three German centers were asked to participate. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions regarding the patients’ individual use and perspectives on remote monitoring. Survey participation was anonymous and on a voluntary basis. A total of 617 patients (71.6% men) participated. Most patients reported feeling well informed (69.3%) and reported having unchanged or improved coping (98.8%) since the start of remote monitoring. At least 39.7% of patients experienced technical problems regarding the transmitter, whereas most patients (60.3%) reported that they never noted technical issues. Older patients had significantly less interest than younger patients in using their own smartphones for data transfer (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with remote follow-up of CIED reported that they felt well informed about the remote monitoring approach. Remote monitoring can support coping with their disease. With remote monitoring, patients experienced a prolongation of intervals of in-person follow-up visits, and especially younger patients would appreciate smartphone-based data transfer of their CIEDs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10017432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100174322023-03-17 The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices Hillmann, Henrike A. K. Hansen, Claudius Przibille, Oliver Duncker, David Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine AIMS: Remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is well established in clinical routine and recommended by current guidelines. Nevertheless, data regarding patients’ perceptions are limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patient perspectives on the remote monitoring of cardiac devices in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with CIEDs and remote monitoring of all current manufacturers from three German centers were asked to participate. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions regarding the patients’ individual use and perspectives on remote monitoring. Survey participation was anonymous and on a voluntary basis. A total of 617 patients (71.6% men) participated. Most patients reported feeling well informed (69.3%) and reported having unchanged or improved coping (98.8%) since the start of remote monitoring. At least 39.7% of patients experienced technical problems regarding the transmitter, whereas most patients (60.3%) reported that they never noted technical issues. Older patients had significantly less interest than younger patients in using their own smartphones for data transfer (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with remote follow-up of CIED reported that they felt well informed about the remote monitoring approach. Remote monitoring can support coping with their disease. With remote monitoring, patients experienced a prolongation of intervals of in-person follow-up visits, and especially younger patients would appreciate smartphone-based data transfer of their CIEDs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10017432/ /pubmed/36937908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123848 Text en Copyright © 2023 Hillmann, Hansen, Przibille and Duncker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Hillmann, Henrike A. K.
Hansen, Claudius
Przibille, Oliver
Duncker, David
The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices
title The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices
title_full The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices
title_fullStr The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices
title_full_unstemmed The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices
title_short The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices
title_sort patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123848
work_keys_str_mv AT hillmannhenrikeak thepatientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices
AT hansenclaudius thepatientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices
AT przibilleoliver thepatientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices
AT dunckerdavid thepatientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices
AT hillmannhenrikeak patientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices
AT hansenclaudius patientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices
AT przibilleoliver patientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices
AT dunckerdavid patientperspectiveonremotemonitoringofimplantablecardiacdevices