Cargando…

Neutralizing activity against Omicron BA.5 after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration comparable to those after Omicron BA.1/BA.2 breakthrough infections

INTRODUCTION: The effect of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld™; AstraZeneca, UK) should be evaluated in the context of concurrent outbreak situations. METHODS: For serologic investigation of tixagevimab/cilgavimab during the BA.5 outbreak period, sera of immunocompromised (IC) hosts sampled before an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Jinyoung, Won, Gunho, Baek, Jin Yang, Lee, Young Ho, Kim, Haein, Huh, Kyungmin, Cho, Sun Young, Kang, Cheol-In, Chung, Doo Ryeon, Peck, Kyong Ran, Lee, Kyo Won, Park, Jae Berm, Yoon, Sang Eun, Kim, Seok Jin, Kim, Won Seog, Yim, Min Su, Kim, Kwangwook, Hyeon, Seokhwan, Kim, Byung Chul, Lee, Yoo-kyung, Ko, Jae-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1139980
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The effect of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld™; AstraZeneca, UK) should be evaluated in the context of concurrent outbreak situations. METHODS: For serologic investigation of tixagevimab/cilgavimab during the BA.5 outbreak period, sera of immunocompromised (IC) hosts sampled before and one month after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration and those of healthcare workers (HCWs) sampled one month after a 3(rd) shot of COVID-19 vaccines, five months after BA.1/BA.2 breakthrough infection (BI), and one month after BA.5 BI were investigated. Semi-quantitative anti-spike protein antibody (Sab) test and plaque reduction neutralizing test (PRNT) against BA.5 were performed. RESULTS: A total of 19 IC hosts (five received tixagevimab/cilgavimab 300 mg and 14 received 600 mg) and 41 HCWs (21 experienced BA.1/BA.2 BI and 20 experienced BA.5 BI) were evaluated. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between IC hosts and HCWs except for age and hypertension. Sab significantly increased after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration (median 130.2 BAU/mL before tixagevimab/cilgavimab, 5,665.8 BAU/mL after 300 mg, and 10,217 BAU/mL after 600 mg; both P < 0.001). Sab of one month after the 3(rd) shot (12,144.2 BAU/mL) or five months after BA.1/BA.2 BI (10,455.8 BAU/mL) were comparable with that of tixagevimab/cilgavimab 600 mg, while Sab of one month after BA.5 BI were significantly higher (22,216.0 BAU/mL; P < 0.001). BA.5 PRNT ND(50) significantly increased after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration (median ND(50) 29.6 before tixagevimab/cilgavimab, 170.8 after 300 mg, and 298.5 after 600 mg; both P < 0.001). The ND(50) after tixagevimab/cilgavimab 600 mg was comparable to those of five months after BA.1 BI (ND(50) 200.9) while ND(50) of one month after the 3(rd) shot was significantly lower (ND(50) 107.6; P = 0.019). The ND(50) of one month after BA.5 BI (ND(50) 1,272.5) was highest among tested groups, but statistical difference was not noticed with tixagevimab/cilgavimab 600 mg. CONCLUSION: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab provided a comparable neutralizing activity against the BA.5 with a healthy adult population who were vaccinated with a 3(rd) shot and experienced BA.1/BA.2 BI.