Cargando…

ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric conduit emptying can occur after esophagectomy and has been shown to be associated with increased risk for postoperative complications. Application of a standardized clinical protocol after esophagectomy including an upper gastrointestinal contrast study has the potential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klevebro, F., Konradsson, M., Han, S., Luttikhold, J., Nilsson, M., Lindblad, M., Andersson, M., Low, D. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09695-9
_version_ 1784907617299070976
author Klevebro, F.
Konradsson, M.
Han, S.
Luttikhold, J.
Nilsson, M.
Lindblad, M.
Andersson, M.
Low, D. E.
author_facet Klevebro, F.
Konradsson, M.
Han, S.
Luttikhold, J.
Nilsson, M.
Lindblad, M.
Andersson, M.
Low, D. E.
author_sort Klevebro, F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric conduit emptying can occur after esophagectomy and has been shown to be associated with increased risk for postoperative complications. Application of a standardized clinical protocol after esophagectomy including an upper gastrointestinal contrast study has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Prospective cohort including all patients operated with esophagectomy at two high-volume centers for esophageal surgery. The standardized clinical protocol included an upper gastrointestinal contrast study on day 2 or 3 after surgery. All images were compiled and evaluated for the purpose of the study. Clinical data was collected in IRB approved institutional databases at the participating centers. RESULTS: The study included 119 patients treated with esophagectomy of whom 112 (94.1%) completed an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. The results showed that 8 (7.1%) patients had radiological delayed gastric conduit emptying defined as no emptying of contrast through the pylorus. Partial conduit emptying was seen in 34 (30.4%) patients, and 70 (62.5%) patients had complete conduit emptying. Complete or partial emptying was associated with significantly earlier nasogastric tube removal (3 vs. 6 days) and hospital discharge 8 vs. 17 days, P < 0.001). Radiological signs of delayed gastric conduit emptying were shown to be associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. There was, however, no association with severe postoperative complications according to Clavien–Dindo score, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak or need for intensive care. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrate that postoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast studies can be used to assess the level of emptying of the gastric conduit after esophagectomy. Application of upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the ERAS guidelines-driven standardized clinical pathway after esophagectomy has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10017562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100175622023-03-17 ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes Klevebro, F. Konradsson, M. Han, S. Luttikhold, J. Nilsson, M. Lindblad, M. Andersson, M. Low, D. E. Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric conduit emptying can occur after esophagectomy and has been shown to be associated with increased risk for postoperative complications. Application of a standardized clinical protocol after esophagectomy including an upper gastrointestinal contrast study has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Prospective cohort including all patients operated with esophagectomy at two high-volume centers for esophageal surgery. The standardized clinical protocol included an upper gastrointestinal contrast study on day 2 or 3 after surgery. All images were compiled and evaluated for the purpose of the study. Clinical data was collected in IRB approved institutional databases at the participating centers. RESULTS: The study included 119 patients treated with esophagectomy of whom 112 (94.1%) completed an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. The results showed that 8 (7.1%) patients had radiological delayed gastric conduit emptying defined as no emptying of contrast through the pylorus. Partial conduit emptying was seen in 34 (30.4%) patients, and 70 (62.5%) patients had complete conduit emptying. Complete or partial emptying was associated with significantly earlier nasogastric tube removal (3 vs. 6 days) and hospital discharge 8 vs. 17 days, P < 0.001). Radiological signs of delayed gastric conduit emptying were shown to be associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. There was, however, no association with severe postoperative complications according to Clavien–Dindo score, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak or need for intensive care. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrate that postoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast studies can be used to assess the level of emptying of the gastric conduit after esophagectomy. Application of upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the ERAS guidelines-driven standardized clinical pathway after esophagectomy has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes. Springer US 2022-10-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10017562/ /pubmed/36229553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09695-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Klevebro, F.
Konradsson, M.
Han, S.
Luttikhold, J.
Nilsson, M.
Lindblad, M.
Andersson, M.
Low, D. E.
ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes
title ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes
title_full ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes
title_fullStr ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes
title_full_unstemmed ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes
title_short ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes
title_sort eras guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09695-9
work_keys_str_mv AT klevebrof erasguidelinesdrivenuppergastrointestinalcontraststudyafteresophagectomycandetectdelayedgastricconduitemptyingandimproveoutcomes
AT konradssonm erasguidelinesdrivenuppergastrointestinalcontraststudyafteresophagectomycandetectdelayedgastricconduitemptyingandimproveoutcomes
AT hans erasguidelinesdrivenuppergastrointestinalcontraststudyafteresophagectomycandetectdelayedgastricconduitemptyingandimproveoutcomes
AT luttikholdj erasguidelinesdrivenuppergastrointestinalcontraststudyafteresophagectomycandetectdelayedgastricconduitemptyingandimproveoutcomes
AT nilssonm erasguidelinesdrivenuppergastrointestinalcontraststudyafteresophagectomycandetectdelayedgastricconduitemptyingandimproveoutcomes
AT lindbladm erasguidelinesdrivenuppergastrointestinalcontraststudyafteresophagectomycandetectdelayedgastricconduitemptyingandimproveoutcomes
AT anderssonm erasguidelinesdrivenuppergastrointestinalcontraststudyafteresophagectomycandetectdelayedgastricconduitemptyingandimproveoutcomes
AT lowde erasguidelinesdrivenuppergastrointestinalcontraststudyafteresophagectomycandetectdelayedgastricconduitemptyingandimproveoutcomes