Cargando…

Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology

BACKGROUND: Phase and step annotation in surgical videos is a prerequisite for surgical scene understanding and for downstream tasks like intraoperative feedback or assistance. However, most ontologies are applied on small monocentric datasets and lack external validation. To overcome these limitati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lavanchy, Joël L., Gonzalez, Cristians, Kassem, Hasan, Nett, Philipp C., Mutter, Didier, Padoy, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09745-2
_version_ 1784907629992083456
author Lavanchy, Joël L.
Gonzalez, Cristians
Kassem, Hasan
Nett, Philipp C.
Mutter, Didier
Padoy, Nicolas
author_facet Lavanchy, Joël L.
Gonzalez, Cristians
Kassem, Hasan
Nett, Philipp C.
Mutter, Didier
Padoy, Nicolas
author_sort Lavanchy, Joël L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phase and step annotation in surgical videos is a prerequisite for surgical scene understanding and for downstream tasks like intraoperative feedback or assistance. However, most ontologies are applied on small monocentric datasets and lack external validation. To overcome these limitations an ontology for phases and steps of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is proposed and validated on a multicentric dataset in terms of inter- and intra-rater reliability (inter-/intra-RR). METHODS: The proposed LRYGB ontology consists of 12 phase and 46 step definitions that are hierarchically structured. Two board certified surgeons (raters) with > 10 years of clinical experience applied the proposed ontology on two datasets: (1) StraBypass40 consists of 40 LRYGB videos from Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France and (2) BernBypass70 consists of 70 LRYGB videos from Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. To assess inter-RR the two raters’ annotations of ten randomly chosen videos from StraBypass40 and BernBypass70 each, were compared. To assess intra-RR ten randomly chosen videos were annotated twice by the same rater and annotations were compared. Inter-RR was calculated using Cohen’s kappa. Additionally, for inter- and intra-RR accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and application dependent metrics were applied. RESULTS: The mean ± SD video duration was 108 ± 33 min and 75 ± 21 min in StraBypass40 and BernBypass70, respectively. The proposed ontology shows an inter-RR of 96.8 ± 2.7% for phases and 85.4 ± 6.0% for steps on StraBypass40 and 94.9 ± 5.8% for phases and 76.1 ± 13.9% for steps on BernBypass70. The overall Cohen’s kappa of inter-RR was 95.9 ± 4.3% for phases and 80.8 ± 10.0% for steps. Intra-RR showed an accuracy of 98.4 ± 1.1% for phases and 88.1 ± 8.1% for steps. CONCLUSION: The proposed ontology shows an excellent inter- and intra-RR and should therefore be implemented routinely in phase and step annotation of LRYGB. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09745-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10017621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100176212023-03-17 Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology Lavanchy, Joël L. Gonzalez, Cristians Kassem, Hasan Nett, Philipp C. Mutter, Didier Padoy, Nicolas Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: Phase and step annotation in surgical videos is a prerequisite for surgical scene understanding and for downstream tasks like intraoperative feedback or assistance. However, most ontologies are applied on small monocentric datasets and lack external validation. To overcome these limitations an ontology for phases and steps of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is proposed and validated on a multicentric dataset in terms of inter- and intra-rater reliability (inter-/intra-RR). METHODS: The proposed LRYGB ontology consists of 12 phase and 46 step definitions that are hierarchically structured. Two board certified surgeons (raters) with > 10 years of clinical experience applied the proposed ontology on two datasets: (1) StraBypass40 consists of 40 LRYGB videos from Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France and (2) BernBypass70 consists of 70 LRYGB videos from Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. To assess inter-RR the two raters’ annotations of ten randomly chosen videos from StraBypass40 and BernBypass70 each, were compared. To assess intra-RR ten randomly chosen videos were annotated twice by the same rater and annotations were compared. Inter-RR was calculated using Cohen’s kappa. Additionally, for inter- and intra-RR accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and application dependent metrics were applied. RESULTS: The mean ± SD video duration was 108 ± 33 min and 75 ± 21 min in StraBypass40 and BernBypass70, respectively. The proposed ontology shows an inter-RR of 96.8 ± 2.7% for phases and 85.4 ± 6.0% for steps on StraBypass40 and 94.9 ± 5.8% for phases and 76.1 ± 13.9% for steps on BernBypass70. The overall Cohen’s kappa of inter-RR was 95.9 ± 4.3% for phases and 80.8 ± 10.0% for steps. Intra-RR showed an accuracy of 98.4 ± 1.1% for phases and 88.1 ± 8.1% for steps. CONCLUSION: The proposed ontology shows an excellent inter- and intra-RR and should therefore be implemented routinely in phase and step annotation of LRYGB. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09745-2. Springer US 2022-10-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10017621/ /pubmed/36289088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09745-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lavanchy, Joël L.
Gonzalez, Cristians
Kassem, Hasan
Nett, Philipp C.
Mutter, Didier
Padoy, Nicolas
Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology
title Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology
title_full Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology
title_fullStr Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology
title_full_unstemmed Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology
title_short Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology
title_sort proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery ontology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09745-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lavanchyjoell proposalandmulticentricvalidationofalaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryontology
AT gonzalezcristians proposalandmulticentricvalidationofalaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryontology
AT kassemhasan proposalandmulticentricvalidationofalaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryontology
AT nettphilippc proposalandmulticentricvalidationofalaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryontology
AT mutterdidier proposalandmulticentricvalidationofalaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryontology
AT padoynicolas proposalandmulticentricvalidationofalaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypasssurgeryontology