Cargando…

Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI

OBJECTIVES: Prostate volume (PV) in combination with prostate specific antigen (PSA) yields PSA density which is an increasingly important biomarker. Calculating PV from MRI is a time-consuming, radiologist-dependent task. The aim of this study was to assess whether a deep learning algorithm can rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thimansson, Erik, Bengtsson, J., Baubeta, E., Engman, J., Flondell-Sité, D., Bjartell, A., Zackrisson, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36371606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09239-8
_version_ 1784907633102159872
author Thimansson, Erik
Bengtsson, J.
Baubeta, E.
Engman, J.
Flondell-Sité, D.
Bjartell, A.
Zackrisson, S.
author_facet Thimansson, Erik
Bengtsson, J.
Baubeta, E.
Engman, J.
Flondell-Sité, D.
Bjartell, A.
Zackrisson, S.
author_sort Thimansson, Erik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Prostate volume (PV) in combination with prostate specific antigen (PSA) yields PSA density which is an increasingly important biomarker. Calculating PV from MRI is a time-consuming, radiologist-dependent task. The aim of this study was to assess whether a deep learning algorithm can replace PI-RADS 2.1 based ellipsoid formula (EF) for calculating PV. METHODS: Eight different measures of PV were retrospectively collected for each of 124 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and preoperative MRI of the prostate (multicenter and multi-scanner MRI’s 1.5 and 3 T). Agreement between volumes obtained from the deep learning algorithm (PV(DL)) and ellipsoid formula by two radiologists (PV(EF1) and PV(EF2)) was evaluated against the reference standard PV obtained by manual planimetry by an expert radiologist (PV(MPE)). A sensitivity analysis was performed using a prostatectomy specimen as the reference standard. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated between the radiologists using the ellipsoid formula and between the expert and inexperienced radiologists performing manual planimetry. RESULTS: PV(DL) showed better agreement and precision than PV(EF1) and PV(EF2) using the reference standard PV(MPE) (mean difference [95% limits of agreement] PV(DL): −0.33 [−10.80; 10.14], PV(EF1): −3.83 [−19.55; 11.89], PV(EF2): −3.05 [−18.55; 12.45]) or the PV determined based on specimen weight (PV(DL): −4.22 [−22.52; 14.07], PV(EF1): −7.89 [−30.50; 14.73], PV(EF2): −6.97 [−30.13; 16.18]). Inter-reader agreement was excellent between the two experienced radiologists using the ellipsoid formula and was good between expert and inexperienced radiologists performing manual planimetry. CONCLUSION: Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI. KEY POINTS: • A commercially available deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI. • The deep-learning algorithm was previously untrained on this heterogenous multicenter day-to-day practice MRI data set. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09239-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10017633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100176332023-03-17 Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI Thimansson, Erik Bengtsson, J. Baubeta, E. Engman, J. Flondell-Sité, D. Bjartell, A. Zackrisson, S. Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: Prostate volume (PV) in combination with prostate specific antigen (PSA) yields PSA density which is an increasingly important biomarker. Calculating PV from MRI is a time-consuming, radiologist-dependent task. The aim of this study was to assess whether a deep learning algorithm can replace PI-RADS 2.1 based ellipsoid formula (EF) for calculating PV. METHODS: Eight different measures of PV were retrospectively collected for each of 124 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and preoperative MRI of the prostate (multicenter and multi-scanner MRI’s 1.5 and 3 T). Agreement between volumes obtained from the deep learning algorithm (PV(DL)) and ellipsoid formula by two radiologists (PV(EF1) and PV(EF2)) was evaluated against the reference standard PV obtained by manual planimetry by an expert radiologist (PV(MPE)). A sensitivity analysis was performed using a prostatectomy specimen as the reference standard. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated between the radiologists using the ellipsoid formula and between the expert and inexperienced radiologists performing manual planimetry. RESULTS: PV(DL) showed better agreement and precision than PV(EF1) and PV(EF2) using the reference standard PV(MPE) (mean difference [95% limits of agreement] PV(DL): −0.33 [−10.80; 10.14], PV(EF1): −3.83 [−19.55; 11.89], PV(EF2): −3.05 [−18.55; 12.45]) or the PV determined based on specimen weight (PV(DL): −4.22 [−22.52; 14.07], PV(EF1): −7.89 [−30.50; 14.73], PV(EF2): −6.97 [−30.13; 16.18]). Inter-reader agreement was excellent between the two experienced radiologists using the ellipsoid formula and was good between expert and inexperienced radiologists performing manual planimetry. CONCLUSION: Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI. KEY POINTS: • A commercially available deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI. • The deep-learning algorithm was previously untrained on this heterogenous multicenter day-to-day practice MRI data set. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09239-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10017633/ /pubmed/36371606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09239-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Thimansson, Erik
Bengtsson, J.
Baubeta, E.
Engman, J.
Flondell-Sité, D.
Bjartell, A.
Zackrisson, S.
Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI
title Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI
title_full Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI
title_fullStr Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI
title_short Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI
title_sort deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on mri
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36371606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09239-8
work_keys_str_mv AT thimanssonerik deeplearningalgorithmperformssimilarlytoradiologistsintheassessmentofprostatevolumeonmri
AT bengtssonj deeplearningalgorithmperformssimilarlytoradiologistsintheassessmentofprostatevolumeonmri
AT baubetae deeplearningalgorithmperformssimilarlytoradiologistsintheassessmentofprostatevolumeonmri
AT engmanj deeplearningalgorithmperformssimilarlytoradiologistsintheassessmentofprostatevolumeonmri
AT flondellsited deeplearningalgorithmperformssimilarlytoradiologistsintheassessmentofprostatevolumeonmri
AT bjartella deeplearningalgorithmperformssimilarlytoradiologistsintheassessmentofprostatevolumeonmri
AT zackrissons deeplearningalgorithmperformssimilarlytoradiologistsintheassessmentofprostatevolumeonmri