Cargando…

Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Multiple studies have explored the use of visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to enhance visual function. These studies vary in sample size, outcome measures, and methodology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the effects of NIBS on visual functi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bello, Umar M., Wang, Jingying, Park, Adela S. Y., Tan, Ken W. S., Cheung, Blossom W. S., Thompson, Benjamin, Cheong, Allen M. Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1119200
_version_ 1784907687012597760
author Bello, Umar M.
Wang, Jingying
Park, Adela S. Y.
Tan, Ken W. S.
Cheung, Blossom W. S.
Thompson, Benjamin
Cheong, Allen M. Y.
author_facet Bello, Umar M.
Wang, Jingying
Park, Adela S. Y.
Tan, Ken W. S.
Cheung, Blossom W. S.
Thompson, Benjamin
Cheong, Allen M. Y.
author_sort Bello, Umar M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Multiple studies have explored the use of visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to enhance visual function. These studies vary in sample size, outcome measures, and methodology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the effects of NIBS on visual functions in human participants with normal vision. METHODS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines, and a review protocol was registered with PROSPERO before study commencement (CRD42021255882). We searched Embase, Medline, PsychInfo, PubMed, OpenGrey and Web of Science using relevant keywords. The search covered the period from 1st January 2000 until 1st September 2021. Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software was used for quantitative analysis. RESULTS: Fifty studies were included in the systematic review. Only five studies utilized transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and no TMS studies met our pre-specified criteria for meta-analysis. Nineteen transcranial electrical stimulation studies (tES, 38%) met the criteria for meta-analysis and were the focus of our review. Meta-analysis indicated acute effects (Hedges’s g = 0.232, 95% CI: 0.023–0.442, p = 0.029) and aftereffects (0.590, 95% CI: 0.182–0.998, p = 0.005) of tES on contrast sensitivity. Visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitudes were significantly enhanced immediately after tES (0.383, 95% CI: 0.110–0.665, p = 0.006). Both tES (0.563, 95% CI: 0.230–0.896, p = 0.001) and anodal-transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) alone (0.655, 95% CI: 0.273–1.038, p = 0.001) reduced crowding in peripheral vision. The effects of tES on visual acuity, motion perception and reaction time were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: There are significant effects of visual cortex tES on contrast sensitivity, VEP amplitude, an index of cortical excitability, and crowding among normally sighted individuals. Additional studies are required to enable a comparable meta-analysis of TMS effects. Future studies with robust experimental designs are needed to extend these findings to populations with vision loss. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov/, identifier CRD42021255882.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10017867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100178672023-03-17 Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis Bello, Umar M. Wang, Jingying Park, Adela S. Y. Tan, Ken W. S. Cheung, Blossom W. S. Thompson, Benjamin Cheong, Allen M. Y. Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: Multiple studies have explored the use of visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to enhance visual function. These studies vary in sample size, outcome measures, and methodology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the effects of NIBS on visual functions in human participants with normal vision. METHODS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines, and a review protocol was registered with PROSPERO before study commencement (CRD42021255882). We searched Embase, Medline, PsychInfo, PubMed, OpenGrey and Web of Science using relevant keywords. The search covered the period from 1st January 2000 until 1st September 2021. Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software was used for quantitative analysis. RESULTS: Fifty studies were included in the systematic review. Only five studies utilized transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and no TMS studies met our pre-specified criteria for meta-analysis. Nineteen transcranial electrical stimulation studies (tES, 38%) met the criteria for meta-analysis and were the focus of our review. Meta-analysis indicated acute effects (Hedges’s g = 0.232, 95% CI: 0.023–0.442, p = 0.029) and aftereffects (0.590, 95% CI: 0.182–0.998, p = 0.005) of tES on contrast sensitivity. Visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitudes were significantly enhanced immediately after tES (0.383, 95% CI: 0.110–0.665, p = 0.006). Both tES (0.563, 95% CI: 0.230–0.896, p = 0.001) and anodal-transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) alone (0.655, 95% CI: 0.273–1.038, p = 0.001) reduced crowding in peripheral vision. The effects of tES on visual acuity, motion perception and reaction time were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: There are significant effects of visual cortex tES on contrast sensitivity, VEP amplitude, an index of cortical excitability, and crowding among normally sighted individuals. Additional studies are required to enable a comparable meta-analysis of TMS effects. Future studies with robust experimental designs are needed to extend these findings to populations with vision loss. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov/, identifier CRD42021255882. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10017867/ /pubmed/36937668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1119200 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bello, Wang, Park, Tan, Cheung, Thompson and Cheong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bello, Umar M.
Wang, Jingying
Park, Adela S. Y.
Tan, Ken W. S.
Cheung, Blossom W. S.
Thompson, Benjamin
Cheong, Allen M. Y.
Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1119200
work_keys_str_mv AT belloumarm canvisualcortexnoninvasivebrainstimulationimprovenormalvisualfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangjingying canvisualcortexnoninvasivebrainstimulationimprovenormalvisualfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT parkadelasy canvisualcortexnoninvasivebrainstimulationimprovenormalvisualfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tankenws canvisualcortexnoninvasivebrainstimulationimprovenormalvisualfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cheungblossomws canvisualcortexnoninvasivebrainstimulationimprovenormalvisualfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thompsonbenjamin canvisualcortexnoninvasivebrainstimulationimprovenormalvisualfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cheongallenmy canvisualcortexnoninvasivebrainstimulationimprovenormalvisualfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis