Cargando…
Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum
The psychological sciences are suffering from the primacy of the “here and now” and from a radical utilitarian view of science—this is certainly true in less affluent countries around the world. Portugal is a particular case study, as both psychology departments and funding agencies are largely bias...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17456916221105213 |
_version_ | 1784907727617654784 |
---|---|
author | Almeida, Jorge |
author_facet | Almeida, Jorge |
author_sort | Almeida, Jorge |
collection | PubMed |
description | The psychological sciences are suffering from the primacy of the “here and now” and from a radical utilitarian view of science—this is certainly true in less affluent countries around the world. Portugal is a particular case study, as both psychology departments and funding agencies are largely biased toward applied psychology—but this is a more global trend. The field needs to find a balance between applied and basic psychology to better respond to the challenges of tomorrow. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10018049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100180492023-03-17 Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum Almeida, Jorge Perspect Psychol Sci Article The psychological sciences are suffering from the primacy of the “here and now” and from a radical utilitarian view of science—this is certainly true in less affluent countries around the world. Portugal is a particular case study, as both psychology departments and funding agencies are largely biased toward applied psychology—but this is a more global trend. The field needs to find a balance between applied and basic psychology to better respond to the challenges of tomorrow. SAGE Publications 2022-09-06 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10018049/ /pubmed/36068007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17456916221105213 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Almeida, Jorge Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum |
title | Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of
the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum |
title_full | Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of
the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum |
title_fullStr | Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of
the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum |
title_full_unstemmed | Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of
the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum |
title_short | Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of
the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum |
title_sort | underfunding basic psychological science because of the primacy of
the here and now: a scientific conundrum |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17456916221105213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almeidajorge underfundingbasicpsychologicalsciencebecauseoftheprimacyofthehereandnowascientificconundrum |