Cargando…

Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum

The psychological sciences are suffering from the primacy of the “here and now” and from a radical utilitarian view of science—this is certainly true in less affluent countries around the world. Portugal is a particular case study, as both psychology departments and funding agencies are largely bias...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Almeida, Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17456916221105213
_version_ 1784907727617654784
author Almeida, Jorge
author_facet Almeida, Jorge
author_sort Almeida, Jorge
collection PubMed
description The psychological sciences are suffering from the primacy of the “here and now” and from a radical utilitarian view of science—this is certainly true in less affluent countries around the world. Portugal is a particular case study, as both psychology departments and funding agencies are largely biased toward applied psychology—but this is a more global trend. The field needs to find a balance between applied and basic psychology to better respond to the challenges of tomorrow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10018049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100180492023-03-17 Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum Almeida, Jorge Perspect Psychol Sci Article The psychological sciences are suffering from the primacy of the “here and now” and from a radical utilitarian view of science—this is certainly true in less affluent countries around the world. Portugal is a particular case study, as both psychology departments and funding agencies are largely biased toward applied psychology—but this is a more global trend. The field needs to find a balance between applied and basic psychology to better respond to the challenges of tomorrow. SAGE Publications 2022-09-06 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10018049/ /pubmed/36068007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17456916221105213 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Almeida, Jorge
Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum
title Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum
title_full Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum
title_fullStr Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum
title_full_unstemmed Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum
title_short Underfunding Basic Psychological Science Because of the Primacy of the Here and Now: A Scientific Conundrum
title_sort underfunding basic psychological science because of the primacy of the here and now: a scientific conundrum
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17456916221105213
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidajorge underfundingbasicpsychologicalsciencebecauseoftheprimacyofthehereandnowascientificconundrum