Cargando…
Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty
INTRODUCTION: The present paper proposes a tool to follow up the compliance of staff and students with biosecurity rules, as enforced in a veterinary faculty, i.e., animal clinics, teaching laboratories, dissection rooms, and educational pig herd and farm. METHODS: Starting from a generic list of it...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.960051 |
_version_ | 1784907753546842112 |
---|---|
author | Humblet, Marie-France Saegerman, Claude |
author_facet | Humblet, Marie-France Saegerman, Claude |
author_sort | Humblet, Marie-France |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The present paper proposes a tool to follow up the compliance of staff and students with biosecurity rules, as enforced in a veterinary faculty, i.e., animal clinics, teaching laboratories, dissection rooms, and educational pig herd and farm. METHODS: Starting from a generic list of items gathered into several categories (personal dress and equipment, animal-related items, infrastructures, waste management, management of material/equipment and behavior), a checklist was created for each sector/activity mentioned above, based on the rules and procedures compiled in the Faculty biosecurity standard operating procedures. Checklists were created as Excel™ files. For each sector, several sheets were elaborated, i.e., one per specific activity: for example, the following sheets were created for the equine clinic: class 1-2 hospitalization (class 1 = non-infectious conditions; class 2 = infectious disease with a low or non-existent risk of transmission), class 3 hospitalization (class 3 = infectious disease with a moderate risk of transmission; these patients are suspected of having an infectious disease and being contagious for other patients and/or for humans) and consultation. RESULTS: Class 4 area, which corresponds to the isolation unit and aims at housing patients suffering from infectious diseases with a significant risk of transmission (including notifiable conditions), was not audited at that period, as it was undergoing renovation works. The audit relied on observations performed by a unique observer to ensure standardization. Observed items were presented as yes/no and multiple-choice questions. A scale from 0 to 3 or 4 (depending on the item) allowed scoring each item, i.e., 0 corresponding to 100% compliance with the procedure and the highest score to the worst situation. A median and average global score was also estimated by category and by activity. DISCUSSION: The methodology described in the present paper allows estimating the compliance with biosecurity standard operating procedures in a specific sector and/or for a given activity. The identification of criteria needing improvement is a key point: it helps prioritizing actions to be implemented and awareness raising among people concerned. Regular internal auditing is an essential part of a biosecurity plan, the frequency being conditioned by the risk linked to a specific activity or area (i.e., more frequent audits in risky situations). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10018162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100181622023-03-17 Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty Humblet, Marie-France Saegerman, Claude Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science INTRODUCTION: The present paper proposes a tool to follow up the compliance of staff and students with biosecurity rules, as enforced in a veterinary faculty, i.e., animal clinics, teaching laboratories, dissection rooms, and educational pig herd and farm. METHODS: Starting from a generic list of items gathered into several categories (personal dress and equipment, animal-related items, infrastructures, waste management, management of material/equipment and behavior), a checklist was created for each sector/activity mentioned above, based on the rules and procedures compiled in the Faculty biosecurity standard operating procedures. Checklists were created as Excel™ files. For each sector, several sheets were elaborated, i.e., one per specific activity: for example, the following sheets were created for the equine clinic: class 1-2 hospitalization (class 1 = non-infectious conditions; class 2 = infectious disease with a low or non-existent risk of transmission), class 3 hospitalization (class 3 = infectious disease with a moderate risk of transmission; these patients are suspected of having an infectious disease and being contagious for other patients and/or for humans) and consultation. RESULTS: Class 4 area, which corresponds to the isolation unit and aims at housing patients suffering from infectious diseases with a significant risk of transmission (including notifiable conditions), was not audited at that period, as it was undergoing renovation works. The audit relied on observations performed by a unique observer to ensure standardization. Observed items were presented as yes/no and multiple-choice questions. A scale from 0 to 3 or 4 (depending on the item) allowed scoring each item, i.e., 0 corresponding to 100% compliance with the procedure and the highest score to the worst situation. A median and average global score was also estimated by category and by activity. DISCUSSION: The methodology described in the present paper allows estimating the compliance with biosecurity standard operating procedures in a specific sector and/or for a given activity. The identification of criteria needing improvement is a key point: it helps prioritizing actions to be implemented and awareness raising among people concerned. Regular internal auditing is an essential part of a biosecurity plan, the frequency being conditioned by the risk linked to a specific activity or area (i.e., more frequent audits in risky situations). Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10018162/ /pubmed/36937021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.960051 Text en Copyright © 2023 Humblet and Saegerman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Humblet, Marie-France Saegerman, Claude Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty |
title | Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty |
title_full | Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty |
title_fullStr | Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty |
title_full_unstemmed | Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty |
title_short | Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty |
title_sort | internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.960051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT humbletmariefrance internalauditsasatooltoassessthecompliancewithbiosecurityrulesinaveterinaryfaculty AT saegermanclaude internalauditsasatooltoassessthecompliancewithbiosecurityrulesinaveterinaryfaculty |