Cargando…

Efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era

PURPOSE: Lung transplant (LTx) recipients are at risk for poor outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of patients receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab and cilgavimab after LTx. METHODS: All LTx recipients with outpatien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gottlieb, Jens, Simon, Susanne, Barton, Jürgen, Barnikel, Michaela, Bachmann, Marcus, Klingenberg, Merle-Sophie, Veit, Tobias, Kneidinger, Nikolaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36929650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02018-7
_version_ 1784907848261566464
author Gottlieb, Jens
Simon, Susanne
Barton, Jürgen
Barnikel, Michaela
Bachmann, Marcus
Klingenberg, Merle-Sophie
Veit, Tobias
Kneidinger, Nikolaus
author_facet Gottlieb, Jens
Simon, Susanne
Barton, Jürgen
Barnikel, Michaela
Bachmann, Marcus
Klingenberg, Merle-Sophie
Veit, Tobias
Kneidinger, Nikolaus
author_sort Gottlieb, Jens
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Lung transplant (LTx) recipients are at risk for poor outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of patients receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab and cilgavimab after LTx. METHODS: All LTx recipients with outpatient visits from February 28th to October 31st, 2022 at two German centers were included. Baseline characteristics were recorded and patients followed until November 30rd, 2022. Infections with SARS-CoV-2, disease severity, and COVID-19-associated death were compared between patients with and without PrEP. RESULTS: In total, 1438 patients were included in the analysis, and 419 (29%) received PrEP. Patients receiving PrEP were older and earlier after transplantation, had lower glomerular filtration rates, and lower levels of SARS-CoV-2-S antibodies. In total, 535 patients (37%) developed SARS-CoV-2 infection during a follow-up of median of 209 days. Fewer infections occurred in patients with PrEP during the study period (31% vs. 40%, p = 0.004). Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after PrEP occurred in 77 patients (19%). In total, 37 infections (8%) were severe or critical. No difference in severity of COVID-19 was observed between patients with and without PrEP. There were 15 COVID-19-associated deaths (n = 1 after PrEP). Compared to matched controls, there was a non-significant difference towards a lower risk for moderate to critical COVID-19 (p 0.184). CONCLUSION: The number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was lower in LTx recipients with PrEP. Despite being at higher risk for worse outcome severity of COVID-19 and associated mortality were similar in patients with and without PrEP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s15010-023-02018-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10018612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100186122023-03-16 Efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era Gottlieb, Jens Simon, Susanne Barton, Jürgen Barnikel, Michaela Bachmann, Marcus Klingenberg, Merle-Sophie Veit, Tobias Kneidinger, Nikolaus Infection Research PURPOSE: Lung transplant (LTx) recipients are at risk for poor outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of patients receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab and cilgavimab after LTx. METHODS: All LTx recipients with outpatient visits from February 28th to October 31st, 2022 at two German centers were included. Baseline characteristics were recorded and patients followed until November 30rd, 2022. Infections with SARS-CoV-2, disease severity, and COVID-19-associated death were compared between patients with and without PrEP. RESULTS: In total, 1438 patients were included in the analysis, and 419 (29%) received PrEP. Patients receiving PrEP were older and earlier after transplantation, had lower glomerular filtration rates, and lower levels of SARS-CoV-2-S antibodies. In total, 535 patients (37%) developed SARS-CoV-2 infection during a follow-up of median of 209 days. Fewer infections occurred in patients with PrEP during the study period (31% vs. 40%, p = 0.004). Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after PrEP occurred in 77 patients (19%). In total, 37 infections (8%) were severe or critical. No difference in severity of COVID-19 was observed between patients with and without PrEP. There were 15 COVID-19-associated deaths (n = 1 after PrEP). Compared to matched controls, there was a non-significant difference towards a lower risk for moderate to critical COVID-19 (p 0.184). CONCLUSION: The number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was lower in LTx recipients with PrEP. Despite being at higher risk for worse outcome severity of COVID-19 and associated mortality were similar in patients with and without PrEP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s15010-023-02018-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10018612/ /pubmed/36929650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02018-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Gottlieb, Jens
Simon, Susanne
Barton, Jürgen
Barnikel, Michaela
Bachmann, Marcus
Klingenberg, Merle-Sophie
Veit, Tobias
Kneidinger, Nikolaus
Efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era
title Efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era
title_full Efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era
title_fullStr Efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era
title_short Efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era
title_sort efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent sars-cov-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36929650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02018-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gottliebjens efficacyofpreexposureprophylaxistopreventsarscov2infectionafterlungtransplantationatwocentercohortstudyduringtheomicronera
AT simonsusanne efficacyofpreexposureprophylaxistopreventsarscov2infectionafterlungtransplantationatwocentercohortstudyduringtheomicronera
AT bartonjurgen efficacyofpreexposureprophylaxistopreventsarscov2infectionafterlungtransplantationatwocentercohortstudyduringtheomicronera
AT barnikelmichaela efficacyofpreexposureprophylaxistopreventsarscov2infectionafterlungtransplantationatwocentercohortstudyduringtheomicronera
AT bachmannmarcus efficacyofpreexposureprophylaxistopreventsarscov2infectionafterlungtransplantationatwocentercohortstudyduringtheomicronera
AT klingenbergmerlesophie efficacyofpreexposureprophylaxistopreventsarscov2infectionafterlungtransplantationatwocentercohortstudyduringtheomicronera
AT veittobias efficacyofpreexposureprophylaxistopreventsarscov2infectionafterlungtransplantationatwocentercohortstudyduringtheomicronera
AT kneidingernikolaus efficacyofpreexposureprophylaxistopreventsarscov2infectionafterlungtransplantationatwocentercohortstudyduringtheomicronera