Cargando…
Evaluation of a workflow for cone‐beam CT‐guided online adaptive palliative radiotherapy planned using diagnostic CT scans
PURPOSE: Single‐visit radiotherapy (RT) is beneficial for patients requiring pain control and can limit interruptions to systemic treatments. However, the requirement for a dedicated planning CT (pCT)‐scan can result in treatment delays. We developed a workflow involving preplanning on available dia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36573256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13841 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: Single‐visit radiotherapy (RT) is beneficial for patients requiring pain control and can limit interruptions to systemic treatments. However, the requirement for a dedicated planning CT (pCT)‐scan can result in treatment delays. We developed a workflow involving preplanning on available diagnostic CT (dCT) imaging, followed by online plan adaption using a cone‐beam CT (CBCT)‐scan prior to RT‐delivery, in order to account for any changes in anatomy and target position. METHODS: Patients previously treated with palliative RT for bone metastases were selected from our hospital database. Patient dCT‐images were deformed to treatment CBCTs in the Ethos platform (Varian Medical Systems) and a synthetic CT (sCT) generated. Treatment quality was analyzed by comparing a coverage of the V95% of the planning/clinical target volume and different organ‐at‐risk (OAR) doses between adapted and initial clinical treatment plans. Doses were recalculated on the CBCT and sCT in a separate treatment planning system. Adapted plan doses were measured on‐couch using an anthropomorphic phantom with a Gafchromic EBT3 dosimetric film and compared to dose calculations. RESULTS: All adapted treatment plans met the clinical goals for target and OARs and outperformed the original treatment plans calculated on the (daily) sCT. Differences in V95% of the target volume coverage between the initial and adapted treatments were <0.2%. Dose recalculations on CBCT and sCT were comparable, and the average gamma pass rate (3%/2 mm) of dosimetric measurements was 98.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Online daily adaptive RT using dCTs instead of a dedicated pCT is feasible using the Ethos platform. This workflow has now been implemented clinically. |
---|