Cargando…

Evaluation of MRI‐only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on MR‐linac

PURPOSE: A hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) can perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with high soft‐tissue contrast to be used for online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). To obtain electron densities needed for the oART dose calculation, a computed tomography (CT) is often deforma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nousiainen, Katri, Santurio, Grichar Valdes, Lundahl, Nils, Cronholm, Rickard, Siversson, Carl, Edmund, Jens M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13838
_version_ 1784907862709895168
author Nousiainen, Katri
Santurio, Grichar Valdes
Lundahl, Nils
Cronholm, Rickard
Siversson, Carl
Edmund, Jens M.
author_facet Nousiainen, Katri
Santurio, Grichar Valdes
Lundahl, Nils
Cronholm, Rickard
Siversson, Carl
Edmund, Jens M.
author_sort Nousiainen, Katri
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) can perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with high soft‐tissue contrast to be used for online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). To obtain electron densities needed for the oART dose calculation, a computed tomography (CT) is often deformably registered to MRI. Our aim was to evaluate an MRI‐only based synthetic CT (sCT) generation as an alternative to the deformed CT (dCT)‐based oART in the abdominal region. METHODS: The study data consisted of 57 patients who were treated on a 0.35 T MRL system mainly for abdominal tumors. Simulation MRI‐CT pairs of 43 patients were used for training and validation of a prototype convolutional neural network sCT‐generation algorithm, based on HighRes3DNet, for the abdominal region. For remaining test patients, sCT images were produced from simulation MRIs and daily MRIs. The dCT‐based plans were re‐calculated on sCT with identical calculation parameters. The sCT and dCT were compared in terms of geometric agreement and calculated dose. RESULTS: The mean and one standard deviation of the geometric agreement metrics over dCT–sCT‐pairs were: mean error of 8 ± 10 HU, mean absolute error of 49 ± 10 HU, and Dice similarity coefficient of 55 ± 12%, 60 ± 5%, and 82 ± 15% for bone, fat, and lung tissues, respectively. The dose differences between the sCT and dCT‐based dose for planning target volumes were 0.5 ± 0.9%, 0.6 ± 0.8%, and 0.5 ± 0.8% at D (2%), D (50%), and D (98%) in physical dose and 0.8 ± 1.4%, 0.8 ± 1.2%, and 0.6 ± 1.1% in biologically effective dose (BED). For organs‐at‐risk, the dose differences of all evaluated dose–volume histogram points were within [–4.5%, 7.8%] and [–1.1 Gy, 3.5 Gy] in both physical dose and BED. CONCLUSIONS: The geometric agreement metrics were within typically reported values and most average relative dose differences were within 1%. Thus, an MRI‐only sCT‐based approach is a promising alternative to the current clinical practice of the abdominal oART on MRL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10018672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100186722023-03-17 Evaluation of MRI‐only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on MR‐linac Nousiainen, Katri Santurio, Grichar Valdes Lundahl, Nils Cronholm, Rickard Siversson, Carl Edmund, Jens M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: A hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) can perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with high soft‐tissue contrast to be used for online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). To obtain electron densities needed for the oART dose calculation, a computed tomography (CT) is often deformably registered to MRI. Our aim was to evaluate an MRI‐only based synthetic CT (sCT) generation as an alternative to the deformed CT (dCT)‐based oART in the abdominal region. METHODS: The study data consisted of 57 patients who were treated on a 0.35 T MRL system mainly for abdominal tumors. Simulation MRI‐CT pairs of 43 patients were used for training and validation of a prototype convolutional neural network sCT‐generation algorithm, based on HighRes3DNet, for the abdominal region. For remaining test patients, sCT images were produced from simulation MRIs and daily MRIs. The dCT‐based plans were re‐calculated on sCT with identical calculation parameters. The sCT and dCT were compared in terms of geometric agreement and calculated dose. RESULTS: The mean and one standard deviation of the geometric agreement metrics over dCT–sCT‐pairs were: mean error of 8 ± 10 HU, mean absolute error of 49 ± 10 HU, and Dice similarity coefficient of 55 ± 12%, 60 ± 5%, and 82 ± 15% for bone, fat, and lung tissues, respectively. The dose differences between the sCT and dCT‐based dose for planning target volumes were 0.5 ± 0.9%, 0.6 ± 0.8%, and 0.5 ± 0.8% at D (2%), D (50%), and D (98%) in physical dose and 0.8 ± 1.4%, 0.8 ± 1.2%, and 0.6 ± 1.1% in biologically effective dose (BED). For organs‐at‐risk, the dose differences of all evaluated dose–volume histogram points were within [–4.5%, 7.8%] and [–1.1 Gy, 3.5 Gy] in both physical dose and BED. CONCLUSIONS: The geometric agreement metrics were within typically reported values and most average relative dose differences were within 1%. Thus, an MRI‐only sCT‐based approach is a promising alternative to the current clinical practice of the abdominal oART on MRL. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10018672/ /pubmed/36347050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13838 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Nousiainen, Katri
Santurio, Grichar Valdes
Lundahl, Nils
Cronholm, Rickard
Siversson, Carl
Edmund, Jens M.
Evaluation of MRI‐only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on MR‐linac
title Evaluation of MRI‐only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on MR‐linac
title_full Evaluation of MRI‐only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on MR‐linac
title_fullStr Evaluation of MRI‐only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on MR‐linac
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of MRI‐only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on MR‐linac
title_short Evaluation of MRI‐only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on MR‐linac
title_sort evaluation of mri‐only based online adaptive radiotherapy of abdominal region on mr‐linac
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13838
work_keys_str_mv AT nousiainenkatri evaluationofmrionlybasedonlineadaptiveradiotherapyofabdominalregiononmrlinac
AT santuriogricharvaldes evaluationofmrionlybasedonlineadaptiveradiotherapyofabdominalregiononmrlinac
AT lundahlnils evaluationofmrionlybasedonlineadaptiveradiotherapyofabdominalregiononmrlinac
AT cronholmrickard evaluationofmrionlybasedonlineadaptiveradiotherapyofabdominalregiononmrlinac
AT siverssoncarl evaluationofmrionlybasedonlineadaptiveradiotherapyofabdominalregiononmrlinac
AT edmundjensm evaluationofmrionlybasedonlineadaptiveradiotherapyofabdominalregiononmrlinac