Cargando…

User experience of applying AMSTAR 2 to appraise systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a commentary

BACKGROUND: ‘A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2’ (AMSTAR 2) is a validated 16-item scale designed to appraise systematic reviews (SRs) of healthcare interventions and to rate the overall confidence in their results. This commentary aims to describe the challenges with rating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	De Santis, Karina Karolina, Pieper, Dawid, Lorenz, Robert C., Wegewitz, Uta, Siemens, Waldemar, Matthias, Katja
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2023
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36927334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01879-8

Ejemplares similares

How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Different Approaches to Appraising Systematic Reviews of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion Using AMSTAR 2 Tool: Cross-Sectional Study
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano
Publicado: (2015)

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools
por: Pereira, Alexandre-Godinho, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
por: SEQUEIRA-BYRON, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
por: Pollock, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Commentary on: Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Gould, Daniel J
Publicado: (2021)

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
por: Kim, Hye-Ryeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption
por: Bojcic, Ruzica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
por: Li, Lin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Shea, Beverley J., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
por: Kang, Deying, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement
por: Burda, Brittany U., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Editorial Perspective: Time for Another Grading System—From PRISMA to AMSTAR 2
por: Chapman, Jens R.
Publicado: (2020)

Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews
por: Swierz, Mateusz J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Abstract: Assessing Quality in Systematic Reviews: Application of AMSTAR Criteria to Plastic Surgery Literature
por: Jenny, Hillary E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR
por: Wu, Xinyu, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study
por: Lu, Cuncun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

157: ASSESSING THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS BY AMSTAR CHECKLIST
por: Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Reviews Using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Current Practice of Gradual Return to Work in Germany: A Qualitative Study Protocol
por: Schulz, Inga L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion: Protocol for a Scoping Review
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Influence of Sex, Gender, or Age on Outcomes of Digital Technologies for Treatment and Monitoring of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for an Overview of Systematic Reviews
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2
por: Perry, R., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Verbreitung des betrieblichen Eingliederungsmanagements: Sind Gesundheitsorientierung und soziale Ressourcen bedeutsamer als Betriebsgröße? Ergebnisse der BIBB/BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung 2018
por: Wrage, Wiebke, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools
por: Perry, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Commentary: Appraisal of histopathological correlations in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada uveitis
por: Murugan, Sivaraman Bala
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluation of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion: Scoping Review
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study
por: Oh, Jae Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_sqojo78nm6hlhjj0mdu0j594kc