Cargando…

Individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In on-pump cardiac surgery, lungs are at high risk of periprocedural organ impairment because of atelectasis formation, ventilator-induced lung injury, and hyperinflammation due to the cardiopulmonary bypass which results in postoperative pulmonary complications in half of this patient p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Simon, Schnitzler, Romina, Rembecki, Martin, Geppert, Johannes, Kurz, Christian T., Wichelhaus, Lisa-Marie, Timmesfeld, Nina, Zahn, Peter K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36922825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07201-7
_version_ 1784907923953025024
author Becker, Simon
Schnitzler, Romina
Rembecki, Martin
Geppert, Johannes
Kurz, Christian T.
Wichelhaus, Lisa-Marie
Timmesfeld, Nina
Zahn, Peter K.
author_facet Becker, Simon
Schnitzler, Romina
Rembecki, Martin
Geppert, Johannes
Kurz, Christian T.
Wichelhaus, Lisa-Marie
Timmesfeld, Nina
Zahn, Peter K.
author_sort Becker, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In on-pump cardiac surgery, lungs are at high risk of periprocedural organ impairment because of atelectasis formation, ventilator-induced lung injury, and hyperinflammation due to the cardiopulmonary bypass which results in postoperative pulmonary complications in half of this patient population. The new ventilation mode flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) uniquely allows full control of ins- and expiratory airway flows. This approach reduces the mechanical power of invasive ventilation as a possible cause of ventilator-induced lung injury. The scope of FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG is to compare perioperative individualized FCV with best clinical practice pressure-controlled ventilation (PVC) modes in patients with elective on-pump cardiac surgery procedures. We hypothesize that the postoperative inflammatory response can be reduced by the perioperative application of FCV compared to PCV. METHODS: FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG is a single-center, randomized, parallel-group trial with two intervention arms: perioperative PCV modes (n = 70, PCV group) with an individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and a tidal volume of 6–8 ml/kg predicted bodyweight compared to perioperative FCV (n = 70, FCV group) with an individualized PEEP and driving pressure, resulting in a liberal tidal volume. As the primary study endpoint interleukin 8 plasma level is assessed 6 h after cardiopulmonary bypass as a surrogate biomarker of systemic and pulmonary inflammation. As secondary aims clinically relevant patient outcomes are analyzed, e.g., perioperative lung function regarding oxygenation indices, postoperative pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications, SIRS-free days as well as ICU and total inpatient stays. As additional sub-studies with an exploratory approach perioperative right ventricular function parameters are assessed by echocardiography and perioperative lung aeration by electrical impedance tomography. DISCUSSION: Current paradigms regarding protective low tidal volume ventilation are consciously left in the FCV intervention group in order to reduce mechanical power as a determinant of ventilator-induced lung injury in this high-risk patient population and procedures. This approach will be compared in a randomized controlled trial with current best clinical practice PCV in FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00018956. Registered on 12 June 2020 (Version 1), last update on 22 August 2022 (Version 4). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07201-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10018968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100189682023-03-17 Individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Becker, Simon Schnitzler, Romina Rembecki, Martin Geppert, Johannes Kurz, Christian T. Wichelhaus, Lisa-Marie Timmesfeld, Nina Zahn, Peter K. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In on-pump cardiac surgery, lungs are at high risk of periprocedural organ impairment because of atelectasis formation, ventilator-induced lung injury, and hyperinflammation due to the cardiopulmonary bypass which results in postoperative pulmonary complications in half of this patient population. The new ventilation mode flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) uniquely allows full control of ins- and expiratory airway flows. This approach reduces the mechanical power of invasive ventilation as a possible cause of ventilator-induced lung injury. The scope of FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG is to compare perioperative individualized FCV with best clinical practice pressure-controlled ventilation (PVC) modes in patients with elective on-pump cardiac surgery procedures. We hypothesize that the postoperative inflammatory response can be reduced by the perioperative application of FCV compared to PCV. METHODS: FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG is a single-center, randomized, parallel-group trial with two intervention arms: perioperative PCV modes (n = 70, PCV group) with an individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and a tidal volume of 6–8 ml/kg predicted bodyweight compared to perioperative FCV (n = 70, FCV group) with an individualized PEEP and driving pressure, resulting in a liberal tidal volume. As the primary study endpoint interleukin 8 plasma level is assessed 6 h after cardiopulmonary bypass as a surrogate biomarker of systemic and pulmonary inflammation. As secondary aims clinically relevant patient outcomes are analyzed, e.g., perioperative lung function regarding oxygenation indices, postoperative pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications, SIRS-free days as well as ICU and total inpatient stays. As additional sub-studies with an exploratory approach perioperative right ventricular function parameters are assessed by echocardiography and perioperative lung aeration by electrical impedance tomography. DISCUSSION: Current paradigms regarding protective low tidal volume ventilation are consciously left in the FCV intervention group in order to reduce mechanical power as a determinant of ventilator-induced lung injury in this high-risk patient population and procedures. This approach will be compared in a randomized controlled trial with current best clinical practice PCV in FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00018956. Registered on 12 June 2020 (Version 1), last update on 22 August 2022 (Version 4). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07201-7. BioMed Central 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10018968/ /pubmed/36922825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07201-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Becker, Simon
Schnitzler, Romina
Rembecki, Martin
Geppert, Johannes
Kurz, Christian T.
Wichelhaus, Lisa-Marie
Timmesfeld, Nina
Zahn, Peter K.
Individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (flowventin heartsurg): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36922825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07201-7
work_keys_str_mv AT beckersimon individualizedflowcontrolledversusconventionalpressurecontrolledventilationinonpumpheartsurgeryflowventinheartsurgstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schnitzlerromina individualizedflowcontrolledversusconventionalpressurecontrolledventilationinonpumpheartsurgeryflowventinheartsurgstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rembeckimartin individualizedflowcontrolledversusconventionalpressurecontrolledventilationinonpumpheartsurgeryflowventinheartsurgstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT geppertjohannes individualizedflowcontrolledversusconventionalpressurecontrolledventilationinonpumpheartsurgeryflowventinheartsurgstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kurzchristiant individualizedflowcontrolledversusconventionalpressurecontrolledventilationinonpumpheartsurgeryflowventinheartsurgstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wichelhauslisamarie individualizedflowcontrolledversusconventionalpressurecontrolledventilationinonpumpheartsurgeryflowventinheartsurgstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT timmesfeldnina individualizedflowcontrolledversusconventionalpressurecontrolledventilationinonpumpheartsurgeryflowventinheartsurgstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zahnpeterk individualizedflowcontrolledversusconventionalpressurecontrolledventilationinonpumpheartsurgeryflowventinheartsurgstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial