Cargando…

Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review

Advances in reproductive health technologies such as noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are changing the landscape of prenatal care and maternal health. NIPT, made clinically available in the United States (US) in 2011, is a screening test that utilizes cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect for aneuploid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Shameka P., Keller, Madison A., Ranson, Tiara, Willard, Rachele E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36927679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05423-w
_version_ 1784907926364749824
author Thomas, Shameka P.
Keller, Madison A.
Ranson, Tiara
Willard, Rachele E.
author_facet Thomas, Shameka P.
Keller, Madison A.
Ranson, Tiara
Willard, Rachele E.
author_sort Thomas, Shameka P.
collection PubMed
description Advances in reproductive health technologies such as noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are changing the landscape of prenatal care and maternal health. NIPT, made clinically available in the United States (US) in 2011, is a screening test that utilizes cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect for aneuploidies and genetic characteristics in fetal DNA. In September 2020, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended NIPT for all pregnant patients regardless of age or risk factors. We examined peer-reviewed, empirical studies published from January 2011 to February 2022, assessing NIPT studies with patient perspectives in the US and what is known about how empirical studies include Black women. Our scoping review draws from PubMed (with advanced MeSH search options) and Scopus databases for advanced scoping review, with 33 articles meeting our criteria. Empirical studies on NIPT show patient perceptions range across five themes: 1) accuracy / safety, 2) return of results, 3) patient knowledge, 4) informed consent, and 5) perceptions among minoritized groups (with perceptions of race and gender as a social demographic intersection). Additionally, among the 15 studies that included that Black woman in their study sample, none measured the perceptions of Black women with genetic conditions. Bridging this knowledge gap is critical because NIPT is becoming increasingly accessible across the nation and is being developed to screen for additional genetic conditions, such as sickle cell disease. Ultimately, NIPT researchers need to go to greater lengths to examine the patient perspectives of Black women with and without genetic conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10018979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100189792023-03-17 Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review Thomas, Shameka P. Keller, Madison A. Ranson, Tiara Willard, Rachele E. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Advances in reproductive health technologies such as noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are changing the landscape of prenatal care and maternal health. NIPT, made clinically available in the United States (US) in 2011, is a screening test that utilizes cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect for aneuploidies and genetic characteristics in fetal DNA. In September 2020, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended NIPT for all pregnant patients regardless of age or risk factors. We examined peer-reviewed, empirical studies published from January 2011 to February 2022, assessing NIPT studies with patient perspectives in the US and what is known about how empirical studies include Black women. Our scoping review draws from PubMed (with advanced MeSH search options) and Scopus databases for advanced scoping review, with 33 articles meeting our criteria. Empirical studies on NIPT show patient perceptions range across five themes: 1) accuracy / safety, 2) return of results, 3) patient knowledge, 4) informed consent, and 5) perceptions among minoritized groups (with perceptions of race and gender as a social demographic intersection). Additionally, among the 15 studies that included that Black woman in their study sample, none measured the perceptions of Black women with genetic conditions. Bridging this knowledge gap is critical because NIPT is becoming increasingly accessible across the nation and is being developed to screen for additional genetic conditions, such as sickle cell disease. Ultimately, NIPT researchers need to go to greater lengths to examine the patient perspectives of Black women with and without genetic conditions. BioMed Central 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10018979/ /pubmed/36927679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05423-w Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Thomas, Shameka P.
Keller, Madison A.
Ranson, Tiara
Willard, Rachele E.
Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review
title Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review
title_full Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review
title_fullStr Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review
title_short Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review
title_sort patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the united states: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36927679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05423-w
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasshamekap patientperspectivesonnoninvasiveprenataltestingamongblackwomenintheunitedstatesascopingreview
AT kellermadisona patientperspectivesonnoninvasiveprenataltestingamongblackwomenintheunitedstatesascopingreview
AT ransontiara patientperspectivesonnoninvasiveprenataltestingamongblackwomenintheunitedstatesascopingreview
AT willardrachelee patientperspectivesonnoninvasiveprenataltestingamongblackwomenintheunitedstatesascopingreview