Cargando…
What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later?
More than three years have passed since the first case of a new coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2) in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China). The Wuhan Institute of Virology was founded in that city in 1956 and the country’s first biosafety level 4 laboratory opened within that center in 2015. The coincid...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI).
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36933695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rceng.2023.02.010 |
_version_ | 1784907937930543104 |
---|---|
author | Zapatero Gaviria, A. Barba Martin, R. |
author_facet | Zapatero Gaviria, A. Barba Martin, R. |
author_sort | Zapatero Gaviria, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | More than three years have passed since the first case of a new coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2) in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China). The Wuhan Institute of Virology was founded in that city in 1956 and the country’s first biosafety level 4 laboratory opened within that center in 2015. The coincidence that the first cases of infection emerged in the city where the virology institute’s headquarters is located, the failure to 100% identify the virus’ RNA in any of the coronaviruses isolated in bats, and the lack of evidence on a possible intermediate animal host in the contagion’s transmission make it so that at present, there are doubts about the real origin of SARS-CoV-2. This article will review two theories: SARS-CoV-2 as a virus of zoonotic origin or as a leak from the high-level biosafety laboratory in Wuhan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10019034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100190342023-03-16 What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later? Zapatero Gaviria, A. Barba Martin, R. Rev Clin Esp (Barc) Review More than three years have passed since the first case of a new coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2) in the city of Wuhan (Hubei, China). The Wuhan Institute of Virology was founded in that city in 1956 and the country’s first biosafety level 4 laboratory opened within that center in 2015. The coincidence that the first cases of infection emerged in the city where the virology institute’s headquarters is located, the failure to 100% identify the virus’ RNA in any of the coronaviruses isolated in bats, and the lack of evidence on a possible intermediate animal host in the contagion’s transmission make it so that at present, there are doubts about the real origin of SARS-CoV-2. This article will review two theories: SARS-CoV-2 as a virus of zoonotic origin or as a leak from the high-level biosafety laboratory in Wuhan. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). 2023-04 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10019034/ /pubmed/36933695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rceng.2023.02.010 Text en © 2023 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Zapatero Gaviria, A. Barba Martin, R. What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later? |
title | What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later? |
title_full | What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later? |
title_fullStr | What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later? |
title_full_unstemmed | What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later? |
title_short | What do we know about the origin of COVID-19 three years later? |
title_sort | what do we know about the origin of covid-19 three years later? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36933695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rceng.2023.02.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zapaterogaviriaa whatdoweknowabouttheoriginofcovid19threeyearslater AT barbamartinr whatdoweknowabouttheoriginofcovid19threeyearslater |