Cargando…
YouTube as a source of information on sacroiliac joint injection: A reliability and quality analysis
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injection is recommended for both diagnosis and relief of SIJ pain. YouTube has become a widely used source for health professionals and patients to obtain information about various procedures but the quality of YouTube videos including medical content is questionable. Therefo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36930104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033207 |
_version_ | 1784907972415062016 |
---|---|
author | Ozturk, Ekim Can Yilmaz, Habip Sacaklidir, Rekib Sencan, Savas Gunduz, Osman Hakan |
author_facet | Ozturk, Ekim Can Yilmaz, Habip Sacaklidir, Rekib Sencan, Savas Gunduz, Osman Hakan |
author_sort | Ozturk, Ekim Can |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injection is recommended for both diagnosis and relief of SIJ pain. YouTube has become a widely used source for health professionals and patients to obtain information about various procedures but the quality of YouTube videos including medical content is questionable. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of SIJ injection videos on YouTube. This cross-sectional study was conducted through March 2022 by searching the phrase “sacroiliac joint injection” on YouTube. After resetting search history top 100 videos were screened. Duration of videos, number of views, number of likes, number of comments, view ratio (number of views/d), time passed since upload date, guide used for injection, and source of videos were recorded. The DISCERN and the Global Quality Scale were used to assess the quality and reliability of the videos. Of the 100 videos screened 42 videos met the inclusion criteria. The videos (73.8%) were predominantly uploaded by physicians. Most frequently used guide for injections was ultrasound with 45.4%. According to the DISCERN classification, 35.7% of the videos were “very poor,” 30.9% were “poor,” 21.4% were “fair,” 7.1% were “good” and 4.7% were “excellent.” Physicians and patients should be aware of that many of the videos about SIJ injections are categorized as “poor” or “very poor,” which means they may mislead trainees, resulting in inadequate treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10019178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100191782023-03-17 YouTube as a source of information on sacroiliac joint injection: A reliability and quality analysis Ozturk, Ekim Can Yilmaz, Habip Sacaklidir, Rekib Sencan, Savas Gunduz, Osman Hakan Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injection is recommended for both diagnosis and relief of SIJ pain. YouTube has become a widely used source for health professionals and patients to obtain information about various procedures but the quality of YouTube videos including medical content is questionable. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of SIJ injection videos on YouTube. This cross-sectional study was conducted through March 2022 by searching the phrase “sacroiliac joint injection” on YouTube. After resetting search history top 100 videos were screened. Duration of videos, number of views, number of likes, number of comments, view ratio (number of views/d), time passed since upload date, guide used for injection, and source of videos were recorded. The DISCERN and the Global Quality Scale were used to assess the quality and reliability of the videos. Of the 100 videos screened 42 videos met the inclusion criteria. The videos (73.8%) were predominantly uploaded by physicians. Most frequently used guide for injections was ultrasound with 45.4%. According to the DISCERN classification, 35.7% of the videos were “very poor,” 30.9% were “poor,” 21.4% were “fair,” 7.1% were “good” and 4.7% were “excellent.” Physicians and patients should be aware of that many of the videos about SIJ injections are categorized as “poor” or “very poor,” which means they may mislead trainees, resulting in inadequate treatments. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10019178/ /pubmed/36930104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033207 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 7000 Ozturk, Ekim Can Yilmaz, Habip Sacaklidir, Rekib Sencan, Savas Gunduz, Osman Hakan YouTube as a source of information on sacroiliac joint injection: A reliability and quality analysis |
title | YouTube as a source of information on sacroiliac joint injection: A reliability and quality analysis |
title_full | YouTube as a source of information on sacroiliac joint injection: A reliability and quality analysis |
title_fullStr | YouTube as a source of information on sacroiliac joint injection: A reliability and quality analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | YouTube as a source of information on sacroiliac joint injection: A reliability and quality analysis |
title_short | YouTube as a source of information on sacroiliac joint injection: A reliability and quality analysis |
title_sort | youtube as a source of information on sacroiliac joint injection: a reliability and quality analysis |
topic | 7000 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36930104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozturkekimcan youtubeasasourceofinformationonsacroiliacjointinjectionareliabilityandqualityanalysis AT yilmazhabip youtubeasasourceofinformationonsacroiliacjointinjectionareliabilityandqualityanalysis AT sacaklidirrekib youtubeasasourceofinformationonsacroiliacjointinjectionareliabilityandqualityanalysis AT sencansavas youtubeasasourceofinformationonsacroiliacjointinjectionareliabilityandqualityanalysis AT gunduzosmanhakan youtubeasasourceofinformationonsacroiliacjointinjectionareliabilityandqualityanalysis |