Cargando…

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Exercise for the prevention of low back pain recurrences is recommended, but under-researched. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a walking program for preventing low back pain recurrence remains unknown. This a priori statistical analysis plan describes the methods of analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pocovi, Natasha C., Graham, Petra L., Lin, Chung-Wei Christine, French, Simon D., Latimer, Jane, Merom, Dafna, Tiedemann, Anne, Maher, Christopher G., van Dongen, Johanna M., Clavisi, Ornella, Hancock, Mark J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36927497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07119-0
_version_ 1784908019594690560
author Pocovi, Natasha C.
Graham, Petra L.
Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
French, Simon D.
Latimer, Jane
Merom, Dafna
Tiedemann, Anne
Maher, Christopher G.
van Dongen, Johanna M.
Clavisi, Ornella
Hancock, Mark J.
author_facet Pocovi, Natasha C.
Graham, Petra L.
Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
French, Simon D.
Latimer, Jane
Merom, Dafna
Tiedemann, Anne
Maher, Christopher G.
van Dongen, Johanna M.
Clavisi, Ornella
Hancock, Mark J.
author_sort Pocovi, Natasha C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exercise for the prevention of low back pain recurrences is recommended, but under-researched. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a walking program for preventing low back pain recurrence remains unknown. This a priori statistical analysis plan describes the methods of analysis for the WalkBack trial. METHODS: WalkBack is a prospectively registered, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. The aim is to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month progressive and individualised walking and education program (intervention) for the prevention of low back pain recurrences, compared to a no-treatment control group. The primary outcome is days to the first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting low back pain. Key secondary outcomes include days to any recurrence of low back pain, days to a care-seeking recurrence of low back pain, disability level, health-related quality of life, costs associated with low back pain and adverse events. All participants will be followed for a minimum of 12 months. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Cox regression is planned to assess the effects for the outcomes of time to activity-limiting, minimal and care-seeking recurrence. Hazard ratios and median survival times with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. The effect of the intervention on continuous outcomes will be estimated with repeated-measure linear mixed models. An economic evaluation will be performed from the societal perspective for recurrence prevented (yes/no) and quality-adjusted life years. The proportion of adverse events between groups will be compared using Fisher’s exact test. DISCUSSION: The WalkBack trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a walking intervention to prevent low back pain recurrences. This statistical analysis plan provides transparency on the analysis of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: WalkBack - Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive individualised walking and education program for the prevention of a recurrence of low back pain. ACTRN12619001134112. Date Registered: 14/08/2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07119-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10019396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100193962023-03-16 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial Pocovi, Natasha C. Graham, Petra L. Lin, Chung-Wei Christine French, Simon D. Latimer, Jane Merom, Dafna Tiedemann, Anne Maher, Christopher G. van Dongen, Johanna M. Clavisi, Ornella Hancock, Mark J. Trials Update BACKGROUND: Exercise for the prevention of low back pain recurrences is recommended, but under-researched. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a walking program for preventing low back pain recurrence remains unknown. This a priori statistical analysis plan describes the methods of analysis for the WalkBack trial. METHODS: WalkBack is a prospectively registered, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. The aim is to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month progressive and individualised walking and education program (intervention) for the prevention of low back pain recurrences, compared to a no-treatment control group. The primary outcome is days to the first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting low back pain. Key secondary outcomes include days to any recurrence of low back pain, days to a care-seeking recurrence of low back pain, disability level, health-related quality of life, costs associated with low back pain and adverse events. All participants will be followed for a minimum of 12 months. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Cox regression is planned to assess the effects for the outcomes of time to activity-limiting, minimal and care-seeking recurrence. Hazard ratios and median survival times with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. The effect of the intervention on continuous outcomes will be estimated with repeated-measure linear mixed models. An economic evaluation will be performed from the societal perspective for recurrence prevented (yes/no) and quality-adjusted life years. The proportion of adverse events between groups will be compared using Fisher’s exact test. DISCUSSION: The WalkBack trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a walking intervention to prevent low back pain recurrences. This statistical analysis plan provides transparency on the analysis of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: WalkBack - Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive individualised walking and education program for the prevention of a recurrence of low back pain. ACTRN12619001134112. Date Registered: 14/08/2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07119-0. BioMed Central 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10019396/ /pubmed/36927497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07119-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Update
Pocovi, Natasha C.
Graham, Petra L.
Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
French, Simon D.
Latimer, Jane
Merom, Dafna
Tiedemann, Anne
Maher, Christopher G.
van Dongen, Johanna M.
Clavisi, Ornella
Hancock, Mark J.
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the walkback randomised controlled trial
topic Update
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36927497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07119-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pocovinatashac effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT grahampetral effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT linchungweichristine effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT frenchsimond effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT latimerjane effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meromdafna effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tiedemannanne effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maherchristopherg effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandongenjohannam effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clavisiornella effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hancockmarkj effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogramforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstatisticalanalysisplanforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial