Cargando…
Global financing for health policy and systems research: a review of funding opportunities
Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is a neglected area in global health financing. Despite repeated calls for greater investment, it seems that there has been little growth. We analysed trends in reported funding and activity between 2015 and 2021 using a novel real-time source of global heal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czac109 |
_version_ | 1784908051094962176 |
---|---|
author | Kentikelenis, Alexander Ghaffar, Abdul McKee, Martin Dal Zennaro, Livia Stuckler, David |
author_facet | Kentikelenis, Alexander Ghaffar, Abdul McKee, Martin Dal Zennaro, Livia Stuckler, David |
author_sort | Kentikelenis, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is a neglected area in global health financing. Despite repeated calls for greater investment, it seems that there has been little growth. We analysed trends in reported funding and activity between 2015 and 2021 using a novel real-time source of global health data, the Devex.com database, the world’s largest source of funding opportunities related to international development. We performed a systematic search of the Devex.com database for HPSR-related terms with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. We included ‘programs’, ‘tenders & grants’ and ‘contract awards’, covering all call statuses (open, closed or forecast). Such funding opportunities were included if they were related specifically to HPSR funding or had an HPSR component; pure biomedical funding was excluded. Our findings reveal a relative neglect of HPSR, as only ∼2% of all global health funding calls included a discernible HPSR component. Despite increases in funding calls until 2019, this situation reversed in 2020, likely reflecting the redirection of resources to rapid assessments of the impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Most identified projects represented small-scale opportunities—commonly for consultancies or technical assistance. To the extent that new data were generated, these projects were either tied to a specific large intervention or were narrow in scope to meet a specific challenge—with many examples informing policy responses to the Covid-19 pandemic. Nearly half of advertised funding opportunities were multi-country projects, usually addressing global policy priorities like health systems strengthening or development of coordinated public health policies at a regional level. The Covid-19 pandemic has shown why investing in HPSR is more important than ever to enable the delivery of effective health interventions and avoid costly implementation failures. The evidence presented here highlights the need to scale up efforts to convince global health funders to institutionalize the inclusion of HPSR components in all funding calls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10019567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100195672023-03-17 Global financing for health policy and systems research: a review of funding opportunities Kentikelenis, Alexander Ghaffar, Abdul McKee, Martin Dal Zennaro, Livia Stuckler, David Health Policy Plan Review Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is a neglected area in global health financing. Despite repeated calls for greater investment, it seems that there has been little growth. We analysed trends in reported funding and activity between 2015 and 2021 using a novel real-time source of global health data, the Devex.com database, the world’s largest source of funding opportunities related to international development. We performed a systematic search of the Devex.com database for HPSR-related terms with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. We included ‘programs’, ‘tenders & grants’ and ‘contract awards’, covering all call statuses (open, closed or forecast). Such funding opportunities were included if they were related specifically to HPSR funding or had an HPSR component; pure biomedical funding was excluded. Our findings reveal a relative neglect of HPSR, as only ∼2% of all global health funding calls included a discernible HPSR component. Despite increases in funding calls until 2019, this situation reversed in 2020, likely reflecting the redirection of resources to rapid assessments of the impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Most identified projects represented small-scale opportunities—commonly for consultancies or technical assistance. To the extent that new data were generated, these projects were either tied to a specific large intervention or were narrow in scope to meet a specific challenge—with many examples informing policy responses to the Covid-19 pandemic. Nearly half of advertised funding opportunities were multi-country projects, usually addressing global policy priorities like health systems strengthening or development of coordinated public health policies at a regional level. The Covid-19 pandemic has shown why investing in HPSR is more important than ever to enable the delivery of effective health interventions and avoid costly implementation failures. The evidence presented here highlights the need to scale up efforts to convince global health funders to institutionalize the inclusion of HPSR components in all funding calls. Oxford University Press 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10019567/ /pubmed/36546732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czac109 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Kentikelenis, Alexander Ghaffar, Abdul McKee, Martin Dal Zennaro, Livia Stuckler, David Global financing for health policy and systems research: a review of funding opportunities |
title | Global financing for health policy and systems research: a review of funding opportunities |
title_full | Global financing for health policy and systems research: a review of funding opportunities |
title_fullStr | Global financing for health policy and systems research: a review of funding opportunities |
title_full_unstemmed | Global financing for health policy and systems research: a review of funding opportunities |
title_short | Global financing for health policy and systems research: a review of funding opportunities |
title_sort | global financing for health policy and systems research: a review of funding opportunities |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czac109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kentikelenisalexander globalfinancingforhealthpolicyandsystemsresearchareviewoffundingopportunities AT ghaffarabdul globalfinancingforhealthpolicyandsystemsresearchareviewoffundingopportunities AT mckeemartin globalfinancingforhealthpolicyandsystemsresearchareviewoffundingopportunities AT dalzennarolivia globalfinancingforhealthpolicyandsystemsresearchareviewoffundingopportunities AT stucklerdavid globalfinancingforhealthpolicyandsystemsresearchareviewoffundingopportunities |