Cargando…
Perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review
This aim of this scoping review is to map what is known about perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice within the context of the general population’s experience of ‘lockdowns’ imposed by governments worldwide in response to the increased transmission of COVID-19. Arksey & O...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36962987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001250 |
_version_ | 1784908062189944832 |
---|---|
author | Ranieri, Veronica Kamboj, Sunjeev K. Edwards, Sarah J. L. |
author_facet | Ranieri, Veronica Kamboj, Sunjeev K. Edwards, Sarah J. L. |
author_sort | Ranieri, Veronica |
collection | PubMed |
description | This aim of this scoping review is to map what is known about perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice within the context of the general population’s experience of ‘lockdowns’ imposed by governments worldwide in response to the increased transmission of COVID-19. Arksey & O’Malley’s (2005) framework for conducting scoping reviews was chosen. A sensitive search strategy was devised and conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using the following search terms: (adherence OR acceptance OR agreement OR trust OR distrust OR compliance OR willing*) OR (perceived coerc* OR percept* coerc* OR pressure OR force OR influence OR control OR threat OR justice) AND (lockdown) AND (COVID OR SARS-CoV-2 OR COVID-19). The database search initially produced 41,628 articles to screen. A total of 40 articles were included in this review and the following five themes were identified from the studies: perceived acceptability and willingness to adhere to lockdown; perceived control during lockdown; perceived pressures arising from lockdown; perceived threat of sanction from others and the procedural (in)justice of lockdown. Our synthesis suggests that i) individuals experienced an initial willingness and tolerance of lockdown that lessened over time as perceptions of personal control decreased; ii) that social influences may pressure individuals to follow or break lockdown rules; and iii) that justifiability and proportionality together with individuals’ perceptions of harm from COVID-19 may impact the extent to which individuals adhere to lockdown. Furthermore, the review found an absence of information regarding specific individual characteristics and circumstances that increase the likelihood of experiencing perceived coercion and its related constructs and highlights a need for a better understanding of the cultural and socioeconomic factors affecting perceptions of, and adherence to, lockdown. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10019622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100196222023-03-17 Perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review Ranieri, Veronica Kamboj, Sunjeev K. Edwards, Sarah J. L. PLOS Glob Public Health Research Article This aim of this scoping review is to map what is known about perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice within the context of the general population’s experience of ‘lockdowns’ imposed by governments worldwide in response to the increased transmission of COVID-19. Arksey & O’Malley’s (2005) framework for conducting scoping reviews was chosen. A sensitive search strategy was devised and conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using the following search terms: (adherence OR acceptance OR agreement OR trust OR distrust OR compliance OR willing*) OR (perceived coerc* OR percept* coerc* OR pressure OR force OR influence OR control OR threat OR justice) AND (lockdown) AND (COVID OR SARS-CoV-2 OR COVID-19). The database search initially produced 41,628 articles to screen. A total of 40 articles were included in this review and the following five themes were identified from the studies: perceived acceptability and willingness to adhere to lockdown; perceived control during lockdown; perceived pressures arising from lockdown; perceived threat of sanction from others and the procedural (in)justice of lockdown. Our synthesis suggests that i) individuals experienced an initial willingness and tolerance of lockdown that lessened over time as perceptions of personal control decreased; ii) that social influences may pressure individuals to follow or break lockdown rules; and iii) that justifiability and proportionality together with individuals’ perceptions of harm from COVID-19 may impact the extent to which individuals adhere to lockdown. Furthermore, the review found an absence of information regarding specific individual characteristics and circumstances that increase the likelihood of experiencing perceived coercion and its related constructs and highlights a need for a better understanding of the cultural and socioeconomic factors affecting perceptions of, and adherence to, lockdown. Public Library of Science 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10019622/ /pubmed/36962987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001250 Text en © 2023 Ranieri et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ranieri, Veronica Kamboj, Sunjeev K. Edwards, Sarah J. L. Perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review |
title | Perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review |
title_full | Perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review |
title_short | Perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review |
title_sort | perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the covid-19 pandemic: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36962987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranieriveronica perceivedcoercionperceivedpressuresandproceduraljusticearisingfromgloballockdownsduringthecovid19pandemicascopingreview AT kambojsunjeevk perceivedcoercionperceivedpressuresandproceduraljusticearisingfromgloballockdownsduringthecovid19pandemicascopingreview AT edwardssarahjl perceivedcoercionperceivedpressuresandproceduraljusticearisingfromgloballockdownsduringthecovid19pandemicascopingreview |