Cargando…

Artificial intelligence-based point-of-care lung ultrasound for screening COVID-19 pneumoniae: Comparison with CT scans

BACKGROUND: Although lung ultrasound has been reported to be a portable, cost-effective, and accurate method to detect pneumonia, it has not been widely used because of the difficulty in its interpretation. Here, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a novel artificial intelligence-based auto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuroda, Yumi, Kaneko, Tomohiro, Yoshikawa, Hitomi, Uchiyama, Saori, Nagata, Yuichi, Matsushita, Yasushi, Hiki, Makoto, Minamino, Tohru, Takahashi, Kazuhisa, Daida, Hiroyuki, Kagiyama, Nobuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281127
_version_ 1784908082656051200
author Kuroda, Yumi
Kaneko, Tomohiro
Yoshikawa, Hitomi
Uchiyama, Saori
Nagata, Yuichi
Matsushita, Yasushi
Hiki, Makoto
Minamino, Tohru
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Daida, Hiroyuki
Kagiyama, Nobuyuki
author_facet Kuroda, Yumi
Kaneko, Tomohiro
Yoshikawa, Hitomi
Uchiyama, Saori
Nagata, Yuichi
Matsushita, Yasushi
Hiki, Makoto
Minamino, Tohru
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Daida, Hiroyuki
Kagiyama, Nobuyuki
author_sort Kuroda, Yumi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although lung ultrasound has been reported to be a portable, cost-effective, and accurate method to detect pneumonia, it has not been widely used because of the difficulty in its interpretation. Here, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a novel artificial intelligence-based automated pneumonia detection method using point-of-care lung ultrasound (AI-POCUS) for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 who underwent computed tomography (CT) in August and September 2021. A 12-zone AI-POCUS was performed by a novice observer using a pocket-size device within 24 h of the CT scan. Fifteen control subjects were also scanned. Additionally, the accuracy of the simplified 8-zone scan excluding the dorsal chest, was assessed. More than three B-lines detected in one lung zone were considered zone-level positive, and the presence of positive AI-POCUS in any lung zone was considered patient-level positive. The sample size calculation was not performed given the retrospective all-comer nature of the study. RESULTS: A total of 577 lung zones from 56 subjects (59.4 ± 14.8 years, 23% female) were evaluated using AI-POCUS. The mean number of days from disease onset was 9, and 14% of patients were under mechanical ventilation. The CT-validated pneumonia was seen in 71.4% of patients at total 577 lung zones (53.3%). The 12-zone AI-POCUS for detecting CT-validated pneumonia in the patient-level showed the accuracy of 94.5% (85.1%– 98.1%), sensitivity of 92.3% (79.7%– 97.3%), specificity of 100% (80.6%– 100%), positive predictive value of 95.0% (89.6% - 97.7%), and Kappa of 0.33 (0.27–0.40). When simplified with 8-zone scan, the accuracy, sensitivity, and sensitivity were 83.9% (72.2%– 91.3%), 77.5% (62.5%– 87.7%), and 100% (80.6%– 100%), respectively. The zone-level accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of AI-POCUS were 65.3% (61.4%– 69.1%), 37.2% (32.0%– 42.7%), and 97.8% (95.2%– 99.0%), respectively. INTERPRETATION: AI-POCUS using the novel pocket-size ultrasound system showed excellent agreement with CT-validated COVID-19 pneumonia, even when used by a novice observer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10019704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100197042023-03-17 Artificial intelligence-based point-of-care lung ultrasound for screening COVID-19 pneumoniae: Comparison with CT scans Kuroda, Yumi Kaneko, Tomohiro Yoshikawa, Hitomi Uchiyama, Saori Nagata, Yuichi Matsushita, Yasushi Hiki, Makoto Minamino, Tohru Takahashi, Kazuhisa Daida, Hiroyuki Kagiyama, Nobuyuki PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Although lung ultrasound has been reported to be a portable, cost-effective, and accurate method to detect pneumonia, it has not been widely used because of the difficulty in its interpretation. Here, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a novel artificial intelligence-based automated pneumonia detection method using point-of-care lung ultrasound (AI-POCUS) for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 who underwent computed tomography (CT) in August and September 2021. A 12-zone AI-POCUS was performed by a novice observer using a pocket-size device within 24 h of the CT scan. Fifteen control subjects were also scanned. Additionally, the accuracy of the simplified 8-zone scan excluding the dorsal chest, was assessed. More than three B-lines detected in one lung zone were considered zone-level positive, and the presence of positive AI-POCUS in any lung zone was considered patient-level positive. The sample size calculation was not performed given the retrospective all-comer nature of the study. RESULTS: A total of 577 lung zones from 56 subjects (59.4 ± 14.8 years, 23% female) were evaluated using AI-POCUS. The mean number of days from disease onset was 9, and 14% of patients were under mechanical ventilation. The CT-validated pneumonia was seen in 71.4% of patients at total 577 lung zones (53.3%). The 12-zone AI-POCUS for detecting CT-validated pneumonia in the patient-level showed the accuracy of 94.5% (85.1%– 98.1%), sensitivity of 92.3% (79.7%– 97.3%), specificity of 100% (80.6%– 100%), positive predictive value of 95.0% (89.6% - 97.7%), and Kappa of 0.33 (0.27–0.40). When simplified with 8-zone scan, the accuracy, sensitivity, and sensitivity were 83.9% (72.2%– 91.3%), 77.5% (62.5%– 87.7%), and 100% (80.6%– 100%), respectively. The zone-level accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of AI-POCUS were 65.3% (61.4%– 69.1%), 37.2% (32.0%– 42.7%), and 97.8% (95.2%– 99.0%), respectively. INTERPRETATION: AI-POCUS using the novel pocket-size ultrasound system showed excellent agreement with CT-validated COVID-19 pneumonia, even when used by a novice observer. Public Library of Science 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10019704/ /pubmed/36928805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281127 Text en © 2023 Kuroda et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kuroda, Yumi
Kaneko, Tomohiro
Yoshikawa, Hitomi
Uchiyama, Saori
Nagata, Yuichi
Matsushita, Yasushi
Hiki, Makoto
Minamino, Tohru
Takahashi, Kazuhisa
Daida, Hiroyuki
Kagiyama, Nobuyuki
Artificial intelligence-based point-of-care lung ultrasound for screening COVID-19 pneumoniae: Comparison with CT scans
title Artificial intelligence-based point-of-care lung ultrasound for screening COVID-19 pneumoniae: Comparison with CT scans
title_full Artificial intelligence-based point-of-care lung ultrasound for screening COVID-19 pneumoniae: Comparison with CT scans
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence-based point-of-care lung ultrasound for screening COVID-19 pneumoniae: Comparison with CT scans
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence-based point-of-care lung ultrasound for screening COVID-19 pneumoniae: Comparison with CT scans
title_short Artificial intelligence-based point-of-care lung ultrasound for screening COVID-19 pneumoniae: Comparison with CT scans
title_sort artificial intelligence-based point-of-care lung ultrasound for screening covid-19 pneumoniae: comparison with ct scans
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281127
work_keys_str_mv AT kurodayumi artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT kanekotomohiro artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT yoshikawahitomi artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT uchiyamasaori artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT nagatayuichi artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT matsushitayasushi artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT hikimakoto artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT minaminotohru artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT takahashikazuhisa artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT daidahiroyuki artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans
AT kagiyamanobuyuki artificialintelligencebasedpointofcarelungultrasoundforscreeningcovid19pneumoniaecomparisonwithctscans