Cargando…

Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures (BC) are critical for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, pathogen identification, and resistance testing. Guidelines recommend a blood volume of 8–10 mL per bottle as lower volumes result in decreased sensitivity. We aimed to evaluate factors for non-adherence to rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romann, Lucas, Werlen, Laura, Rommers, Nikki, Hermann, Anja, Gisler, Isabelle, Bassetti, Stefano, Bingisser, Roland, Siegemund, Martin, Roloff, Tim, Weisser, Maja, Muigg, Veronika, Hinic, Vladimira, Osthoff, Michael, Franzeck, Fabian C., Egli, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282918
_version_ 1784908089832505344
author Romann, Lucas
Werlen, Laura
Rommers, Nikki
Hermann, Anja
Gisler, Isabelle
Bassetti, Stefano
Bingisser, Roland
Siegemund, Martin
Roloff, Tim
Weisser, Maja
Muigg, Veronika
Hinic, Vladimira
Osthoff, Michael
Franzeck, Fabian C.
Egli, Adrian
author_facet Romann, Lucas
Werlen, Laura
Rommers, Nikki
Hermann, Anja
Gisler, Isabelle
Bassetti, Stefano
Bingisser, Roland
Siegemund, Martin
Roloff, Tim
Weisser, Maja
Muigg, Veronika
Hinic, Vladimira
Osthoff, Michael
Franzeck, Fabian C.
Egli, Adrian
author_sort Romann, Lucas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood cultures (BC) are critical for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, pathogen identification, and resistance testing. Guidelines recommend a blood volume of 8–10 mL per bottle as lower volumes result in decreased sensitivity. We aimed to evaluate factors for non-adherence to recommended volumes and assess the effects on diagnostic performance. METHODS: From February to April 2020, we measured collected blood volumes by weighing all BC containers from inpatient samples at the University Hospital Basel. Information on BC volumes was merged with clinical and microbiological data, as well as nursing staff schedules. We analyzed factors associated with (i) BC sampling volume, (ii) reaching recommended volumes (≥8 mL), (iii) BC positivity, and (iv) time to positivity using linear and generalized linear mixed effect models. RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 4’118 BC bottles collected from 686 patients. A total of 1’495 (36.3%) of all bottles contained the recommended filling volume of ≥8 mL. Using a central venous and arterial catheter for drawing blood resulted in an increase of filling volume by 0.26 mL (95% CI 0.10, 0.41) and 0.50 mL (95% CI 0.31, 0.69) compared to peripheral venipuncture, respectively. Each additional nursing staff working at the time of blood drawing was associated with 6% higher odds of achieving the recommended filling volume. We found no significant correlation between the filling volume and the positivity rate. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate critical pre-analytical quality markers linked to BC collection procedures to reach recommended collection volumes. No significant impact on the positivity rate was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10019732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100197322023-03-17 Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center Romann, Lucas Werlen, Laura Rommers, Nikki Hermann, Anja Gisler, Isabelle Bassetti, Stefano Bingisser, Roland Siegemund, Martin Roloff, Tim Weisser, Maja Muigg, Veronika Hinic, Vladimira Osthoff, Michael Franzeck, Fabian C. Egli, Adrian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Blood cultures (BC) are critical for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, pathogen identification, and resistance testing. Guidelines recommend a blood volume of 8–10 mL per bottle as lower volumes result in decreased sensitivity. We aimed to evaluate factors for non-adherence to recommended volumes and assess the effects on diagnostic performance. METHODS: From February to April 2020, we measured collected blood volumes by weighing all BC containers from inpatient samples at the University Hospital Basel. Information on BC volumes was merged with clinical and microbiological data, as well as nursing staff schedules. We analyzed factors associated with (i) BC sampling volume, (ii) reaching recommended volumes (≥8 mL), (iii) BC positivity, and (iv) time to positivity using linear and generalized linear mixed effect models. RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 4’118 BC bottles collected from 686 patients. A total of 1’495 (36.3%) of all bottles contained the recommended filling volume of ≥8 mL. Using a central venous and arterial catheter for drawing blood resulted in an increase of filling volume by 0.26 mL (95% CI 0.10, 0.41) and 0.50 mL (95% CI 0.31, 0.69) compared to peripheral venipuncture, respectively. Each additional nursing staff working at the time of blood drawing was associated with 6% higher odds of achieving the recommended filling volume. We found no significant correlation between the filling volume and the positivity rate. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate critical pre-analytical quality markers linked to BC collection procedures to reach recommended collection volumes. No significant impact on the positivity rate was found. Public Library of Science 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10019732/ /pubmed/36928259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282918 Text en © 2023 Romann et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Romann, Lucas
Werlen, Laura
Rommers, Nikki
Hermann, Anja
Gisler, Isabelle
Bassetti, Stefano
Bingisser, Roland
Siegemund, Martin
Roloff, Tim
Weisser, Maja
Muigg, Veronika
Hinic, Vladimira
Osthoff, Michael
Franzeck, Fabian C.
Egli, Adrian
Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center
title Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center
title_full Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center
title_fullStr Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center
title_full_unstemmed Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center
title_short Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center
title_sort factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—analysis at a tertiary medical center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282918
work_keys_str_mv AT romannlucas factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT werlenlaura factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT rommersnikki factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT hermannanja factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT gislerisabelle factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT bassettistefano factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT bingisserroland factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT siegemundmartin factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT rolofftim factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT weissermaja factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT muiggveronika factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT hinicvladimira factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT osthoffmichael factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT franzeckfabianc factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter
AT egliadrian factorsimpactingthepreanalyticalqualityofbloodculturesanalysisatatertiarymedicalcenter