Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of Point of Care Ultrasound Compared to Chest X-Ray in Patients with Hypoxia at a Teaching Hospital Emergency Department in Uganda

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED) worldwide. It affects 9-12% of hospitalized adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. Timely diagnosis of the multiple causes such as pneumonia, heart failure among others is challenging. Chest X-Ray (CXR), one of the most utilized im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kizito, Prisca Mary, Bagonza, Kenneth Daniel, Odakha, Justine Athieno, Nalugya, Linda Grace, Opejo, Pius, Muyingo, Anthony, Chen, Harry, Harborne, Derek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: African Federation for Emergency Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2023.02.004
_version_ 1784908150719119360
author Kizito, Prisca Mary
Bagonza, Kenneth Daniel
Odakha, Justine Athieno
Nalugya, Linda Grace
Opejo, Pius
Muyingo, Anthony
Chen, Harry
Harborne, Derek
author_facet Kizito, Prisca Mary
Bagonza, Kenneth Daniel
Odakha, Justine Athieno
Nalugya, Linda Grace
Opejo, Pius
Muyingo, Anthony
Chen, Harry
Harborne, Derek
author_sort Kizito, Prisca Mary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypoxia is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED) worldwide. It affects 9-12% of hospitalized adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. Timely diagnosis of the multiple causes such as pneumonia, heart failure among others is challenging. Chest X-Ray (CXR), one of the most utilized imaging modalities has many limitations, and the gold standard (Computed Tomography scan) is inaccessible. Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) is more available and increasingly being used, however little is known of its performance in resource limited EDs. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of PoCUS compared with CXR in identifying the causes of hypoxia in the medical ED. METHODS: 49 adults presenting with hypoxia (SP02 ≤ 88%) in the medical ED were evaluated. Ultrasound of the lungs and heart (PoCUS) was done, then CXR obtained. Lung ultrasound (LUS) was compared with CXR (first reference standard). Chest X-Ray and PoCUS were each compared to the physician diagnosis (second reference standard) to determine agreement using an acceptable disagreement cut-off of 15%. RESULTS: 31% more abnormalities were identified by LUS than CXR. Lung ultrasound findings agreed with CXR in 86% of the participants with moderate reliability (ĸ=0.75). There was no significant difference between the actual findings of the two tests (X(2)= 2, p 0.1). Using the second reference, 82% of the CXRs were similar with weak reliability (ĸ=0.5) compared to 98% of PoCUS findings with strong reliability (ĸ=0.9). Compared to PoCUS, CXRs significantly differed from the physician diagnosis (X(2)= 0.85, p 0.38 vs X(2)= 8.5, p 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSION: Overall, PoCUS was not inferior to CXR when compared to final physician diagnosis in identifying causes of hypoxia, and LUS and CXR had comparable performance. Significantly more abnormalities were identified on PoCUS and it demonstrated better agreement and strong reliability with the physician diagnosis than CXR. We recommend PoCUS use in patients with hypoxia attending resource limited in- and pre-hospital settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10019986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher African Federation for Emergency Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100199862023-03-17 Diagnostic Performance of Point of Care Ultrasound Compared to Chest X-Ray in Patients with Hypoxia at a Teaching Hospital Emergency Department in Uganda Kizito, Prisca Mary Bagonza, Kenneth Daniel Odakha, Justine Athieno Nalugya, Linda Grace Opejo, Pius Muyingo, Anthony Chen, Harry Harborne, Derek Afr J Emerg Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Hypoxia is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED) worldwide. It affects 9-12% of hospitalized adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. Timely diagnosis of the multiple causes such as pneumonia, heart failure among others is challenging. Chest X-Ray (CXR), one of the most utilized imaging modalities has many limitations, and the gold standard (Computed Tomography scan) is inaccessible. Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) is more available and increasingly being used, however little is known of its performance in resource limited EDs. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of PoCUS compared with CXR in identifying the causes of hypoxia in the medical ED. METHODS: 49 adults presenting with hypoxia (SP02 ≤ 88%) in the medical ED were evaluated. Ultrasound of the lungs and heart (PoCUS) was done, then CXR obtained. Lung ultrasound (LUS) was compared with CXR (first reference standard). Chest X-Ray and PoCUS were each compared to the physician diagnosis (second reference standard) to determine agreement using an acceptable disagreement cut-off of 15%. RESULTS: 31% more abnormalities were identified by LUS than CXR. Lung ultrasound findings agreed with CXR in 86% of the participants with moderate reliability (ĸ=0.75). There was no significant difference between the actual findings of the two tests (X(2)= 2, p 0.1). Using the second reference, 82% of the CXRs were similar with weak reliability (ĸ=0.5) compared to 98% of PoCUS findings with strong reliability (ĸ=0.9). Compared to PoCUS, CXRs significantly differed from the physician diagnosis (X(2)= 0.85, p 0.38 vs X(2)= 8.5, p 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSION: Overall, PoCUS was not inferior to CXR when compared to final physician diagnosis in identifying causes of hypoxia, and LUS and CXR had comparable performance. Significantly more abnormalities were identified on PoCUS and it demonstrated better agreement and strong reliability with the physician diagnosis than CXR. We recommend PoCUS use in patients with hypoxia attending resource limited in- and pre-hospital settings. African Federation for Emergency Medicine 2023-06 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10019986/ /pubmed/36937619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2023.02.004 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of African Federation for Emergency Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kizito, Prisca Mary
Bagonza, Kenneth Daniel
Odakha, Justine Athieno
Nalugya, Linda Grace
Opejo, Pius
Muyingo, Anthony
Chen, Harry
Harborne, Derek
Diagnostic Performance of Point of Care Ultrasound Compared to Chest X-Ray in Patients with Hypoxia at a Teaching Hospital Emergency Department in Uganda
title Diagnostic Performance of Point of Care Ultrasound Compared to Chest X-Ray in Patients with Hypoxia at a Teaching Hospital Emergency Department in Uganda
title_full Diagnostic Performance of Point of Care Ultrasound Compared to Chest X-Ray in Patients with Hypoxia at a Teaching Hospital Emergency Department in Uganda
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of Point of Care Ultrasound Compared to Chest X-Ray in Patients with Hypoxia at a Teaching Hospital Emergency Department in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of Point of Care Ultrasound Compared to Chest X-Ray in Patients with Hypoxia at a Teaching Hospital Emergency Department in Uganda
title_short Diagnostic Performance of Point of Care Ultrasound Compared to Chest X-Ray in Patients with Hypoxia at a Teaching Hospital Emergency Department in Uganda
title_sort diagnostic performance of point of care ultrasound compared to chest x-ray in patients with hypoxia at a teaching hospital emergency department in uganda
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2023.02.004
work_keys_str_mv AT kizitopriscamary diagnosticperformanceofpointofcareultrasoundcomparedtochestxrayinpatientswithhypoxiaatateachinghospitalemergencydepartmentinuganda
AT bagonzakennethdaniel diagnosticperformanceofpointofcareultrasoundcomparedtochestxrayinpatientswithhypoxiaatateachinghospitalemergencydepartmentinuganda
AT odakhajustineathieno diagnosticperformanceofpointofcareultrasoundcomparedtochestxrayinpatientswithhypoxiaatateachinghospitalemergencydepartmentinuganda
AT nalugyalindagrace diagnosticperformanceofpointofcareultrasoundcomparedtochestxrayinpatientswithhypoxiaatateachinghospitalemergencydepartmentinuganda
AT opejopius diagnosticperformanceofpointofcareultrasoundcomparedtochestxrayinpatientswithhypoxiaatateachinghospitalemergencydepartmentinuganda
AT muyingoanthony diagnosticperformanceofpointofcareultrasoundcomparedtochestxrayinpatientswithhypoxiaatateachinghospitalemergencydepartmentinuganda
AT chenharry diagnosticperformanceofpointofcareultrasoundcomparedtochestxrayinpatientswithhypoxiaatateachinghospitalemergencydepartmentinuganda
AT harbornederek diagnosticperformanceofpointofcareultrasoundcomparedtochestxrayinpatientswithhypoxiaatateachinghospitalemergencydepartmentinuganda