Cargando…
Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses
BACKGROUND: The current global mpox virus (MPXV) outbreak has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by WHO, with more than 80,000 cases confirmed across multiple continents. Diagnosis is confirmed by PCR of viral DNA from vesicle and other swabs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36963141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105424 |
_version_ | 1784908184723390464 |
---|---|
author | Papadakis, Georgina Tran, Thomas Druce, Julian Lim, Chuan Kok Williamson, Deborah A Jackson, Kathy |
author_facet | Papadakis, Georgina Tran, Thomas Druce, Julian Lim, Chuan Kok Williamson, Deborah A Jackson, Kathy |
author_sort | Papadakis, Georgina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current global mpox virus (MPXV) outbreak has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by WHO, with more than 80,000 cases confirmed across multiple continents. Diagnosis is confirmed by PCR of viral DNA from vesicle and other swabs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess commercial RT PCR assays for Orthopoxvirus (OPX) and MPXV for analytical sensitivity, and percent agreements and compare them to primer/probe sets employed at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL), Centers for Disease Control andPrevention (CDC) and US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). Limits of detection (LOD), intra-run variability, cross-reactivity and performance on forty clinical samples was assessed on eleven commercial assays and five primer/probe combinations used at VIDRL, CDC and USAMRIID. RESULTS: All assays were able to detect OPX and MPXV (LOD 57 to 14,495 copies/mL) with intra-run coefficients of variation between Cycle thresholds of 0.58 and 3.44, and there was no unexpected cross-reactivity. All assays demonstrated 100% negative percent agreement with clinical samples and all but one yielded 100% positive percent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in LOD between assays may be dependent on the platform used and sample type. Despite the overall comparable performance of the assays assessed, it is important that routine laboratories perform in-house validations before implementing RT PCR for OPX and/or MPXV as reliable and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MPXV and isolation is crucial to containing the spread of this current outbreak and informing public health interventions and response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10020139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100201392023-03-17 Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses Papadakis, Georgina Tran, Thomas Druce, Julian Lim, Chuan Kok Williamson, Deborah A Jackson, Kathy J Clin Virol Short Communication BACKGROUND: The current global mpox virus (MPXV) outbreak has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by WHO, with more than 80,000 cases confirmed across multiple continents. Diagnosis is confirmed by PCR of viral DNA from vesicle and other swabs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess commercial RT PCR assays for Orthopoxvirus (OPX) and MPXV for analytical sensitivity, and percent agreements and compare them to primer/probe sets employed at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL), Centers for Disease Control andPrevention (CDC) and US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). Limits of detection (LOD), intra-run variability, cross-reactivity and performance on forty clinical samples was assessed on eleven commercial assays and five primer/probe combinations used at VIDRL, CDC and USAMRIID. RESULTS: All assays were able to detect OPX and MPXV (LOD 57 to 14,495 copies/mL) with intra-run coefficients of variation between Cycle thresholds of 0.58 and 3.44, and there was no unexpected cross-reactivity. All assays demonstrated 100% negative percent agreement with clinical samples and all but one yielded 100% positive percent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in LOD between assays may be dependent on the platform used and sample type. Despite the overall comparable performance of the assays assessed, it is important that routine laboratories perform in-house validations before implementing RT PCR for OPX and/or MPXV as reliable and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MPXV and isolation is crucial to containing the spread of this current outbreak and informing public health interventions and response. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2023-04 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10020139/ /pubmed/36963141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105424 Text en Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Elsevier has created a Monkeypox Information Center (https://www.elsevier.com/connect/monkeypox-information-center) in response to the declared public health emergency of international concern, with free information in English on the monkeypox virus. The Monkeypox Information Center is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its monkeypox related research that is available on the Monkeypox Information Center - including this research content - immediately available in publicly funded repositories, with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the Monkeypox Information Center remains active. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Papadakis, Georgina Tran, Thomas Druce, Julian Lim, Chuan Kok Williamson, Deborah A Jackson, Kathy Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses |
title | Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses |
title_full | Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses |
title_short | Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses |
title_sort | evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36963141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papadakisgeorgina evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses AT tranthomas evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses AT drucejulian evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses AT limchuankok evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses AT williamsondeboraha evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses AT jacksonkathy evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses |