Cargando…

Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses

BACKGROUND: The current global mpox virus (MPXV) outbreak has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by WHO, with more than 80,000 cases confirmed across multiple continents. Diagnosis is confirmed by PCR of viral DNA from vesicle and other swabs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papadakis, Georgina, Tran, Thomas, Druce, Julian, Lim, Chuan Kok, Williamson, Deborah A, Jackson, Kathy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36963141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105424
_version_ 1784908184723390464
author Papadakis, Georgina
Tran, Thomas
Druce, Julian
Lim, Chuan Kok
Williamson, Deborah A
Jackson, Kathy
author_facet Papadakis, Georgina
Tran, Thomas
Druce, Julian
Lim, Chuan Kok
Williamson, Deborah A
Jackson, Kathy
author_sort Papadakis, Georgina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current global mpox virus (MPXV) outbreak has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by WHO, with more than 80,000 cases confirmed across multiple continents. Diagnosis is confirmed by PCR of viral DNA from vesicle and other swabs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess commercial RT PCR assays for Orthopoxvirus (OPX) and MPXV for analytical sensitivity, and percent agreements and compare them to primer/probe sets employed at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL), Centers for Disease Control andPrevention (CDC) and US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). Limits of detection (LOD), intra-run variability, cross-reactivity and performance on forty clinical samples was assessed on eleven commercial assays and five primer/probe combinations used at VIDRL, CDC and USAMRIID. RESULTS: All assays were able to detect OPX and MPXV (LOD 57 to 14,495 copies/mL) with intra-run coefficients of variation between Cycle thresholds of 0.58 and 3.44, and there was no unexpected cross-reactivity. All assays demonstrated 100% negative percent agreement with clinical samples and all but one yielded 100% positive percent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in LOD between assays may be dependent on the platform used and sample type. Despite the overall comparable performance of the assays assessed, it is important that routine laboratories perform in-house validations before implementing RT PCR for OPX and/or MPXV as reliable and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MPXV and isolation is crucial to containing the spread of this current outbreak and informing public health interventions and response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10020139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100201392023-03-17 Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses Papadakis, Georgina Tran, Thomas Druce, Julian Lim, Chuan Kok Williamson, Deborah A Jackson, Kathy J Clin Virol Short Communication BACKGROUND: The current global mpox virus (MPXV) outbreak has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by WHO, with more than 80,000 cases confirmed across multiple continents. Diagnosis is confirmed by PCR of viral DNA from vesicle and other swabs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess commercial RT PCR assays for Orthopoxvirus (OPX) and MPXV for analytical sensitivity, and percent agreements and compare them to primer/probe sets employed at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL), Centers for Disease Control andPrevention (CDC) and US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). Limits of detection (LOD), intra-run variability, cross-reactivity and performance on forty clinical samples was assessed on eleven commercial assays and five primer/probe combinations used at VIDRL, CDC and USAMRIID. RESULTS: All assays were able to detect OPX and MPXV (LOD 57 to 14,495 copies/mL) with intra-run coefficients of variation between Cycle thresholds of 0.58 and 3.44, and there was no unexpected cross-reactivity. All assays demonstrated 100% negative percent agreement with clinical samples and all but one yielded 100% positive percent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in LOD between assays may be dependent on the platform used and sample type. Despite the overall comparable performance of the assays assessed, it is important that routine laboratories perform in-house validations before implementing RT PCR for OPX and/or MPXV as reliable and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MPXV and isolation is crucial to containing the spread of this current outbreak and informing public health interventions and response. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2023-04 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10020139/ /pubmed/36963141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105424 Text en Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Elsevier has created a Monkeypox Information Center (https://www.elsevier.com/connect/monkeypox-information-center) in response to the declared public health emergency of international concern, with free information in English on the monkeypox virus. The Monkeypox Information Center is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its monkeypox related research that is available on the Monkeypox Information Center - including this research content - immediately available in publicly funded repositories, with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the Monkeypox Information Center remains active.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Papadakis, Georgina
Tran, Thomas
Druce, Julian
Lim, Chuan Kok
Williamson, Deborah A
Jackson, Kathy
Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses
title Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses
title_full Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses
title_fullStr Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses
title_short Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses
title_sort evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36963141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105424
work_keys_str_mv AT papadakisgeorgina evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses
AT tranthomas evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses
AT drucejulian evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses
AT limchuankok evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses
AT williamsondeboraha evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses
AT jacksonkathy evaluationof16molecularassaysforthedetectionoforthopoxandmpoxviruses