Cargando…
What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation
To propose the suitable diameter of calculus debris produced during flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (fURL). A glass tube was used to simulate the stone excretion process during Furl. Different stone diameters (0.50–1.00 mm, 0.25–0.50 mm, and 0.10–0.25 mm) with three sizes of flexible ureteroscopy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36929459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01430-w |
_version_ | 1784908215719297024 |
---|---|
author | Song, Baiyang Jin, Dan Cheng, Yue Wang, Zhengyi Wang, Fengqi Fang, Li |
author_facet | Song, Baiyang Jin, Dan Cheng, Yue Wang, Zhengyi Wang, Fengqi Fang, Li |
author_sort | Song, Baiyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | To propose the suitable diameter of calculus debris produced during flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (fURL). A glass tube was used to simulate the stone excretion process during Furl. Different stone diameters (0.50–1.00 mm, 0.25–0.50 mm, and 0.10–0.25 mm) with three sizes of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) (7.5Fr, 8.7Fr, and 9.9Fr) and ureteral access sheath (UAS) (12/14Fr) with or without negative pressure suction were employed in the experiment. The intraoperative calculi excretion (ICE) was recorded according to the stones discharged from the gap between fURS and UAS. The ICE raised significantly in thinner fURS and UAS due to the smaller Ratio of Endoscope-Sheath Diameter (RESD). The gravel size ≤ 0.25 mm was conducive to drainage with traditional UAS, while using fURS with negative-pressure UAS could significantly improve ICE. The gravel size ≤ 0.5 mm was conducive to expulsion. We clarify that ICE during ureteroscopy relates to RESD and negative pressure suction. The proper size of the stone fragment is critical in ensuring the expulsion during fURL, ≤ 0.25 mm in traditional UAS and ≤ 0.50 mm in negative-pressure UAS, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10020258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100202582023-03-18 What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation Song, Baiyang Jin, Dan Cheng, Yue Wang, Zhengyi Wang, Fengqi Fang, Li Urolithiasis Research To propose the suitable diameter of calculus debris produced during flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (fURL). A glass tube was used to simulate the stone excretion process during Furl. Different stone diameters (0.50–1.00 mm, 0.25–0.50 mm, and 0.10–0.25 mm) with three sizes of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) (7.5Fr, 8.7Fr, and 9.9Fr) and ureteral access sheath (UAS) (12/14Fr) with or without negative pressure suction were employed in the experiment. The intraoperative calculi excretion (ICE) was recorded according to the stones discharged from the gap between fURS and UAS. The ICE raised significantly in thinner fURS and UAS due to the smaller Ratio of Endoscope-Sheath Diameter (RESD). The gravel size ≤ 0.25 mm was conducive to drainage with traditional UAS, while using fURS with negative-pressure UAS could significantly improve ICE. The gravel size ≤ 0.5 mm was conducive to expulsion. We clarify that ICE during ureteroscopy relates to RESD and negative pressure suction. The proper size of the stone fragment is critical in ensuring the expulsion during fURL, ≤ 0.25 mm in traditional UAS and ≤ 0.50 mm in negative-pressure UAS, respectively. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10020258/ /pubmed/36929459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01430-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Song, Baiyang Jin, Dan Cheng, Yue Wang, Zhengyi Wang, Fengqi Fang, Li What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation |
title | What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation |
title_full | What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation |
title_fullStr | What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation |
title_short | What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation |
title_sort | what is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? an in vitro evaluation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36929459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01430-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songbaiyang whatistheappropriategravelsizeduringureteroscopylithotripsyaninvitroevaluation AT jindan whatistheappropriategravelsizeduringureteroscopylithotripsyaninvitroevaluation AT chengyue whatistheappropriategravelsizeduringureteroscopylithotripsyaninvitroevaluation AT wangzhengyi whatistheappropriategravelsizeduringureteroscopylithotripsyaninvitroevaluation AT wangfengqi whatistheappropriategravelsizeduringureteroscopylithotripsyaninvitroevaluation AT fangli whatistheappropriategravelsizeduringureteroscopylithotripsyaninvitroevaluation |