Cargando…

Impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis

INTRODUCTION: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease from exposure to environmental antigens. Diagnosing HP could be challenging. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/and Asociación Lati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yuh Chin, Gu, Jessie P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1109525
_version_ 1784908273670946816
author Huang, Yuh Chin
Gu, Jessie P.
author_facet Huang, Yuh Chin
Gu, Jessie P.
author_sort Huang, Yuh Chin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease from exposure to environmental antigens. Diagnosing HP could be challenging. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ATS/JRS/ALAT) have published diagnostic guidelines in 2021 and 2020 respectively. The CHEST guideline uses four grades of confidence: confident (>90%), provisional high (70–89%), provisional low (51–69%), and unlikely (≤50%). The ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline uses five grades of confidence: definite (>90%), high (80–89%), moderate (70–79%), low (51–69%) and not excluded (≤50%). In this study, we determined how these two guidelines could have affected the diagnosis of HP made before the guidelines. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-nine adult patients from a previous cohort with HP (ICD-9:495) made between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2013, at Duke University Medical Center were included. We simplified the diagnostic confidence into three categories so we could compare the guidelines: high (≥90%), intermediate (51–89%), and low (≤50%). RESULTS: There were 156 female and 103 male. Mean age was 58 (range: 20–90). 68.8% of the patients had restrictive defects (FVC < 80% pred) and 48.6% had lung biopsy. The CHEST guideline classified 33.6% of the patients into high, 59.5% into intermediate and 6.9% into low confidence categories. The ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline classified 29.7% of the patients into high, 21.2% into intermediate and 49.0% into low confidence categories (p < 0.0001 vs. CHEST). Cohen's kappa was 0.331. In patients with identifiable inciting agents (IAs) (N = 168), the CHEST guideline classified 32.1% of the patients into high, 64.3% into intermediate and 3.6% into low confidence categories. The ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline classified 29.2% of the patients into high, 20.8% into intermediate, and 50.0% into low confidence categories. Cohen's kappa was 0.314. DISCUSSION: In our HP cohort with two-thirds of the patients with restrictive defects, we found the two guidelines had fair agreement in diagnosing HP with or without identifiable IAs. They agreed more when the diagnostic confidence was high. When the diagnostic confidence was lower, however, the ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline was more stringent. Clinicians should be aware of the differences between the two guidelines when evaluating patients suspicious of HP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10020512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100205122023-03-18 Impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis Huang, Yuh Chin Gu, Jessie P. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease from exposure to environmental antigens. Diagnosing HP could be challenging. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ATS/JRS/ALAT) have published diagnostic guidelines in 2021 and 2020 respectively. The CHEST guideline uses four grades of confidence: confident (>90%), provisional high (70–89%), provisional low (51–69%), and unlikely (≤50%). The ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline uses five grades of confidence: definite (>90%), high (80–89%), moderate (70–79%), low (51–69%) and not excluded (≤50%). In this study, we determined how these two guidelines could have affected the diagnosis of HP made before the guidelines. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-nine adult patients from a previous cohort with HP (ICD-9:495) made between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2013, at Duke University Medical Center were included. We simplified the diagnostic confidence into three categories so we could compare the guidelines: high (≥90%), intermediate (51–89%), and low (≤50%). RESULTS: There were 156 female and 103 male. Mean age was 58 (range: 20–90). 68.8% of the patients had restrictive defects (FVC < 80% pred) and 48.6% had lung biopsy. The CHEST guideline classified 33.6% of the patients into high, 59.5% into intermediate and 6.9% into low confidence categories. The ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline classified 29.7% of the patients into high, 21.2% into intermediate and 49.0% into low confidence categories (p < 0.0001 vs. CHEST). Cohen's kappa was 0.331. In patients with identifiable inciting agents (IAs) (N = 168), the CHEST guideline classified 32.1% of the patients into high, 64.3% into intermediate and 3.6% into low confidence categories. The ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline classified 29.2% of the patients into high, 20.8% into intermediate, and 50.0% into low confidence categories. Cohen's kappa was 0.314. DISCUSSION: In our HP cohort with two-thirds of the patients with restrictive defects, we found the two guidelines had fair agreement in diagnosing HP with or without identifiable IAs. They agreed more when the diagnostic confidence was high. When the diagnostic confidence was lower, however, the ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline was more stringent. Clinicians should be aware of the differences between the two guidelines when evaluating patients suspicious of HP. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10020512/ /pubmed/36936212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1109525 Text en Copyright © 2023 Huang and Gu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Huang, Yuh Chin
Gu, Jessie P.
Impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis
title Impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis
title_full Impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis
title_fullStr Impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis
title_short Impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis
title_sort impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36936212
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1109525
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyuhchin impactofdiagnosticguidelinesonthediagnosisofhypersensitivitypneumonitis
AT gujessiep impactofdiagnosticguidelinesonthediagnosisofhypersensitivitypneumonitis