Cargando…
Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle
Objective: To select the most appropriate internal fixation method based on the Pauwels angle, in order to provide a new concept for clinical accurate treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Methods: FNFs models of Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937751 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143575 |
_version_ | 1784908318491279360 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Fuyang Liu, Yuchen Huo, Yi Wang, Ziming Zhang, Jinge Xu, Minghao Ma, Kaiming Wang, Linbao Lu, Yongtao Cheng, Liangliang Zhao, Dewei |
author_facet | Wang, Fuyang Liu, Yuchen Huo, Yi Wang, Ziming Zhang, Jinge Xu, Minghao Ma, Kaiming Wang, Linbao Lu, Yongtao Cheng, Liangliang Zhao, Dewei |
author_sort | Wang, Fuyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To select the most appropriate internal fixation method based on the Pauwels angle, in order to provide a new concept for clinical accurate treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Methods: FNFs models of Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] were created respectively. For Pauwels ≤ [Formula: see text] , 1, 2 and 3 Cannulated Compression Screws (CCS) and Porous Tantalum Screws (PTS) were used to fix the fracture for the models. For Pauwels [Formula: see text] , 3CCS and Medial Buttress Plate (MBP) combined with 1, 2 and 3CCS were used to fix the fracture. Based on the results of the finite element (FE) analysis, the biomechanical properties of each model were compared by analyzing and evaluating the following four parameters: maximal stress of the bone (MBS), maximal stress of the implants (MIS), maximal displacement of bone (MBD), interfragmentary motion (IFM). Results: At Pauwels [Formula: see text] , the larger parameters were found in 1CCS, which was 94.8 MPa (MBS), 307.7 MPa (MIS), 0.86 mm (MBD) and 0.36 mm (IFM). In 2CCS group, the parameters were 86.1 MPa (MBS), 254.4 MPa (MIS), 0.73 mm (MBD) and 0.27 mm (IFM), which were similar to those of PTS. At Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] , with the increase of the number of used CCS, accordingly, the parameters decreased. Particularly, the MIS (Pauwels [Formula: see text] ) of 1CCS was 1,195.3 MPa, but the other were less than the yield range of the materials. At Pauwels [Formula: see text] , the MBS of 3CCS group was 128.6 Mpa, which had the risk of failure. In 2CCS + MBP group, the parameters were 124.2 MPa (MBS), 602.5 MPa (MIS), 0.75 mm (MBD) and 0.48 mm (IFM), The model stability was significantly enhanced after adding MBP. Conclusion: Pauwels type Ⅰ (< [Formula: see text] ) fractures can reduce the number of CCS, and PTS is an appropriate alternative treatment. For Pauwels type Ⅱ fractures ( [Formula: see text] ), the 3CCS fixation method is still recommended. For Pauwels type Ⅲ fractures (> [Formula: see text] ), it is recommended to add MBP to the medial femoral neck and combine with 2CCS to establish a satisfactory fracture healing environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10020692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100206922023-03-18 Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle Wang, Fuyang Liu, Yuchen Huo, Yi Wang, Ziming Zhang, Jinge Xu, Minghao Ma, Kaiming Wang, Linbao Lu, Yongtao Cheng, Liangliang Zhao, Dewei Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Objective: To select the most appropriate internal fixation method based on the Pauwels angle, in order to provide a new concept for clinical accurate treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Methods: FNFs models of Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] were created respectively. For Pauwels ≤ [Formula: see text] , 1, 2 and 3 Cannulated Compression Screws (CCS) and Porous Tantalum Screws (PTS) were used to fix the fracture for the models. For Pauwels [Formula: see text] , 3CCS and Medial Buttress Plate (MBP) combined with 1, 2 and 3CCS were used to fix the fracture. Based on the results of the finite element (FE) analysis, the biomechanical properties of each model were compared by analyzing and evaluating the following four parameters: maximal stress of the bone (MBS), maximal stress of the implants (MIS), maximal displacement of bone (MBD), interfragmentary motion (IFM). Results: At Pauwels [Formula: see text] , the larger parameters were found in 1CCS, which was 94.8 MPa (MBS), 307.7 MPa (MIS), 0.86 mm (MBD) and 0.36 mm (IFM). In 2CCS group, the parameters were 86.1 MPa (MBS), 254.4 MPa (MIS), 0.73 mm (MBD) and 0.27 mm (IFM), which were similar to those of PTS. At Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] , with the increase of the number of used CCS, accordingly, the parameters decreased. Particularly, the MIS (Pauwels [Formula: see text] ) of 1CCS was 1,195.3 MPa, but the other were less than the yield range of the materials. At Pauwels [Formula: see text] , the MBS of 3CCS group was 128.6 Mpa, which had the risk of failure. In 2CCS + MBP group, the parameters were 124.2 MPa (MBS), 602.5 MPa (MIS), 0.75 mm (MBD) and 0.48 mm (IFM), The model stability was significantly enhanced after adding MBP. Conclusion: Pauwels type Ⅰ (< [Formula: see text] ) fractures can reduce the number of CCS, and PTS is an appropriate alternative treatment. For Pauwels type Ⅱ fractures ( [Formula: see text] ), the 3CCS fixation method is still recommended. For Pauwels type Ⅲ fractures (> [Formula: see text] ), it is recommended to add MBP to the medial femoral neck and combine with 2CCS to establish a satisfactory fracture healing environment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10020692/ /pubmed/36937751 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143575 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Liu, Huo, Wang, Zhang, Xu, Ma, Wang, Lu, Cheng and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Wang, Fuyang Liu, Yuchen Huo, Yi Wang, Ziming Zhang, Jinge Xu, Minghao Ma, Kaiming Wang, Linbao Lu, Yongtao Cheng, Liangliang Zhao, Dewei Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle |
title | Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle |
title_full | Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle |
title_short | Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle |
title_sort | biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on pauwels angle |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937751 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangfuyang biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT liuyuchen biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT huoyi biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT wangziming biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT zhangjinge biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT xuminghao biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT makaiming biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT wanglinbao biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT luyongtao biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT chengliangliang biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle AT zhaodewei biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle |