Cargando…

Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle

Objective: To select the most appropriate internal fixation method based on the Pauwels angle, in order to provide a new concept for clinical accurate treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Methods: FNFs models of Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Fuyang, Liu, Yuchen, Huo, Yi, Wang, Ziming, Zhang, Jinge, Xu, Minghao, Ma, Kaiming, Wang, Linbao, Lu, Yongtao, Cheng, Liangliang, Zhao, Dewei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937751
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143575
_version_ 1784908318491279360
author Wang, Fuyang
Liu, Yuchen
Huo, Yi
Wang, Ziming
Zhang, Jinge
Xu, Minghao
Ma, Kaiming
Wang, Linbao
Lu, Yongtao
Cheng, Liangliang
Zhao, Dewei
author_facet Wang, Fuyang
Liu, Yuchen
Huo, Yi
Wang, Ziming
Zhang, Jinge
Xu, Minghao
Ma, Kaiming
Wang, Linbao
Lu, Yongtao
Cheng, Liangliang
Zhao, Dewei
author_sort Wang, Fuyang
collection PubMed
description Objective: To select the most appropriate internal fixation method based on the Pauwels angle, in order to provide a new concept for clinical accurate treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Methods: FNFs models of Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] were created respectively. For Pauwels ≤ [Formula: see text] , 1, 2 and 3 Cannulated Compression Screws (CCS) and Porous Tantalum Screws (PTS) were used to fix the fracture for the models. For Pauwels [Formula: see text] , 3CCS and Medial Buttress Plate (MBP) combined with 1, 2 and 3CCS were used to fix the fracture. Based on the results of the finite element (FE) analysis, the biomechanical properties of each model were compared by analyzing and evaluating the following four parameters: maximal stress of the bone (MBS), maximal stress of the implants (MIS), maximal displacement of bone (MBD), interfragmentary motion (IFM). Results: At Pauwels [Formula: see text] , the larger parameters were found in 1CCS, which was 94.8 MPa (MBS), 307.7 MPa (MIS), 0.86 mm (MBD) and 0.36 mm (IFM). In 2CCS group, the parameters were 86.1 MPa (MBS), 254.4 MPa (MIS), 0.73 mm (MBD) and 0.27 mm (IFM), which were similar to those of PTS. At Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] , with the increase of the number of used CCS, accordingly, the parameters decreased. Particularly, the MIS (Pauwels [Formula: see text] ) of 1CCS was 1,195.3 MPa, but the other were less than the yield range of the materials. At Pauwels [Formula: see text] , the MBS of 3CCS group was 128.6 Mpa, which had the risk of failure. In 2CCS + MBP group, the parameters were 124.2 MPa (MBS), 602.5 MPa (MIS), 0.75 mm (MBD) and 0.48 mm (IFM), The model stability was significantly enhanced after adding MBP. Conclusion: Pauwels type Ⅰ (< [Formula: see text] ) fractures can reduce the number of CCS, and PTS is an appropriate alternative treatment. For Pauwels type Ⅱ fractures ( [Formula: see text] ), the 3CCS fixation method is still recommended. For Pauwels type Ⅲ fractures (> [Formula: see text] ), it is recommended to add MBP to the medial femoral neck and combine with 2CCS to establish a satisfactory fracture healing environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10020692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100206922023-03-18 Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle Wang, Fuyang Liu, Yuchen Huo, Yi Wang, Ziming Zhang, Jinge Xu, Minghao Ma, Kaiming Wang, Linbao Lu, Yongtao Cheng, Liangliang Zhao, Dewei Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Objective: To select the most appropriate internal fixation method based on the Pauwels angle, in order to provide a new concept for clinical accurate treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Methods: FNFs models of Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] were created respectively. For Pauwels ≤ [Formula: see text] , 1, 2 and 3 Cannulated Compression Screws (CCS) and Porous Tantalum Screws (PTS) were used to fix the fracture for the models. For Pauwels [Formula: see text] , 3CCS and Medial Buttress Plate (MBP) combined with 1, 2 and 3CCS were used to fix the fracture. Based on the results of the finite element (FE) analysis, the biomechanical properties of each model were compared by analyzing and evaluating the following four parameters: maximal stress of the bone (MBS), maximal stress of the implants (MIS), maximal displacement of bone (MBD), interfragmentary motion (IFM). Results: At Pauwels [Formula: see text] , the larger parameters were found in 1CCS, which was 94.8 MPa (MBS), 307.7 MPa (MIS), 0.86 mm (MBD) and 0.36 mm (IFM). In 2CCS group, the parameters were 86.1 MPa (MBS), 254.4 MPa (MIS), 0.73 mm (MBD) and 0.27 mm (IFM), which were similar to those of PTS. At Pauwels [Formula: see text] ; [Formula: see text] , with the increase of the number of used CCS, accordingly, the parameters decreased. Particularly, the MIS (Pauwels [Formula: see text] ) of 1CCS was 1,195.3 MPa, but the other were less than the yield range of the materials. At Pauwels [Formula: see text] , the MBS of 3CCS group was 128.6 Mpa, which had the risk of failure. In 2CCS + MBP group, the parameters were 124.2 MPa (MBS), 602.5 MPa (MIS), 0.75 mm (MBD) and 0.48 mm (IFM), The model stability was significantly enhanced after adding MBP. Conclusion: Pauwels type Ⅰ (< [Formula: see text] ) fractures can reduce the number of CCS, and PTS is an appropriate alternative treatment. For Pauwels type Ⅱ fractures ( [Formula: see text] ), the 3CCS fixation method is still recommended. For Pauwels type Ⅲ fractures (> [Formula: see text] ), it is recommended to add MBP to the medial femoral neck and combine with 2CCS to establish a satisfactory fracture healing environment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10020692/ /pubmed/36937751 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143575 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Liu, Huo, Wang, Zhang, Xu, Ma, Wang, Lu, Cheng and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Wang, Fuyang
Liu, Yuchen
Huo, Yi
Wang, Ziming
Zhang, Jinge
Xu, Minghao
Ma, Kaiming
Wang, Linbao
Lu, Yongtao
Cheng, Liangliang
Zhao, Dewei
Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle
title Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle
title_full Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle
title_fullStr Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle
title_short Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on Pauwels angle
title_sort biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures based on pauwels angle
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937751
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143575
work_keys_str_mv AT wangfuyang biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT liuyuchen biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT huoyi biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT wangziming biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT zhangjinge biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT xuminghao biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT makaiming biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT wanglinbao biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT luyongtao biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT chengliangliang biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle
AT zhaodewei biomechanicalstudyofinternalfixationmethodsforfemoralneckfracturesbasedonpauwelsangle