Cargando…

Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have evidenced the disruptive effect of the COVID-19 in microsurgical and reconstructive departments. We report our experience with cross-leg free flaps and (CLFF) and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps (CLVCBF) for lower limb salvage, technical consideration to decre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciudad, Pedro, Escandón, Joseph M., Manrique, Oscar J., Llanca, Lilyan, Reynaga, César, Mayer, Horacio F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02052-6
_version_ 1784908338601918464
author Ciudad, Pedro
Escandón, Joseph M.
Manrique, Oscar J.
Llanca, Lilyan
Reynaga, César
Mayer, Horacio F.
author_facet Ciudad, Pedro
Escandón, Joseph M.
Manrique, Oscar J.
Llanca, Lilyan
Reynaga, César
Mayer, Horacio F.
author_sort Ciudad, Pedro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous reports have evidenced the disruptive effect of the COVID-19 in microsurgical and reconstructive departments. We report our experience with cross-leg free flaps and (CLFF) and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps (CLVCBF) for lower limb salvage, technical consideration to decrease morbidity, and some structural modifications to our protocols for standard of care adapted to the COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively included consecutive patients undergoing reconstruction with CLFFs and CLVCBFs for lower limb salvage from January 2003 to May 2022. We extracted data on baseline demographic characteristics, mechanism of trauma, and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included, 11 (45.8%) underwent reconstruction with CLFF while 13 had CLVCBFs (54.2%). Fifteen patients (62.5%) underwent lower limb reconstruction under general anesthesia while 9 (37.5%) had combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. During COVID-19 pandemic, six CLFF cases were performed under S-E (25%). The average time for pedicle transection of muscle CLFFs and muscle CLVCBFs was comparable between groups (60 days versus 62 days, p = 0.864). A significantly shorter average time was evidenced for pedicle division of fasciocutaneous flaps in the CLFF group when compared to CLVCBFs (45 days versus 59 days, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, CLFFs and CLVCBFs offer an optimal alternative for lower limb salvage using recipient vessels out of the zone of injury from the contralateral limb. Modification in the surgical protocols can decrease improve resource allocation in the setting of severely ill patients during COVID-19. Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10020769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100207692023-03-17 Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19 Ciudad, Pedro Escandón, Joseph M. Manrique, Oscar J. Llanca, Lilyan Reynaga, César Mayer, Horacio F. Eur J Plast Surg Original Paper BACKGROUND: Previous reports have evidenced the disruptive effect of the COVID-19 in microsurgical and reconstructive departments. We report our experience with cross-leg free flaps and (CLFF) and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps (CLVCBF) for lower limb salvage, technical consideration to decrease morbidity, and some structural modifications to our protocols for standard of care adapted to the COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively included consecutive patients undergoing reconstruction with CLFFs and CLVCBFs for lower limb salvage from January 2003 to May 2022. We extracted data on baseline demographic characteristics, mechanism of trauma, and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included, 11 (45.8%) underwent reconstruction with CLFF while 13 had CLVCBFs (54.2%). Fifteen patients (62.5%) underwent lower limb reconstruction under general anesthesia while 9 (37.5%) had combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. During COVID-19 pandemic, six CLFF cases were performed under S-E (25%). The average time for pedicle transection of muscle CLFFs and muscle CLVCBFs was comparable between groups (60 days versus 62 days, p = 0.864). A significantly shorter average time was evidenced for pedicle division of fasciocutaneous flaps in the CLFF group when compared to CLVCBFs (45 days versus 59 days, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, CLFFs and CLVCBFs offer an optimal alternative for lower limb salvage using recipient vessels out of the zone of injury from the contralateral limb. Modification in the surgical protocols can decrease improve resource allocation in the setting of severely ill patients during COVID-19. Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10020769/ /pubmed/37363691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02052-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ciudad, Pedro
Escandón, Joseph M.
Manrique, Oscar J.
Llanca, Lilyan
Reynaga, César
Mayer, Horacio F.
Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19
title Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19
title_full Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19
title_fullStr Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19
title_short Cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after COVID-19
title_sort cross-leg free flaps and cross-leg vascular cable bridge flaps for lower limb salvage: experience before and after covid-19
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02052-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ciudadpedro crosslegfreeflapsandcrosslegvascularcablebridgeflapsforlowerlimbsalvageexperiencebeforeandaftercovid19
AT escandonjosephm crosslegfreeflapsandcrosslegvascularcablebridgeflapsforlowerlimbsalvageexperiencebeforeandaftercovid19
AT manriqueoscarj crosslegfreeflapsandcrosslegvascularcablebridgeflapsforlowerlimbsalvageexperiencebeforeandaftercovid19
AT llancalilyan crosslegfreeflapsandcrosslegvascularcablebridgeflapsforlowerlimbsalvageexperiencebeforeandaftercovid19
AT reynagacesar crosslegfreeflapsandcrosslegvascularcablebridgeflapsforlowerlimbsalvageexperiencebeforeandaftercovid19
AT mayerhoraciof crosslegfreeflapsandcrosslegvascularcablebridgeflapsforlowerlimbsalvageexperiencebeforeandaftercovid19