Cargando…
The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: the efficacy and outcomes of geriatric rehabilitation (GR) have previously been investigated. However, a systematic synthesis of the aspects that are important to patients regarding the quality of GR does not exist. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this scoping review was to systematically synthesi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad032 |
_version_ | 1784908360823341056 |
---|---|
author | Lubbe, Anne L van Rijn, Marjon Groen, Wim G Hilhorst, Sophie Burchell, George L Hertogh, Cees M P M Pol, Margriet C |
author_facet | Lubbe, Anne L van Rijn, Marjon Groen, Wim G Hilhorst, Sophie Burchell, George L Hertogh, Cees M P M Pol, Margriet C |
author_sort | Lubbe, Anne L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: the efficacy and outcomes of geriatric rehabilitation (GR) have previously been investigated. However, a systematic synthesis of the aspects that are important to patients regarding the quality of GR does not exist. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this scoping review was to systematically synthesise the patients’ perspective on the quality of GR. METHODS: we followed the Scoping Review framework and gathered literature including a qualitative study design from multiple databases. The inclusion criteria were: a qualitative study design; a geriatric population; that patients had participated in a geriatric rehabilitation programme and that geriatric rehabilitation was assessed by the patient. The results sections of the included studies were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: twenty articles were included in this review. The main themes identified were: (i) the need for information about the rehabilitation process, (ii) the need for telling one’s story, (iii) the need for support (physical, psychological, social and how to cope with limitations), (iv) the need for shared decision-making and autonomy, (v) the need for a stimulating rehabilitation environment and (vi) the need for rehabilitation at home. CONCLUSION: in this study, we identified the aspects that determine the quality of rehabilitation from the patient’s perspective, which may lead to a more holistic perspective on the quality of GR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10020894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100208942023-03-18 The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review Lubbe, Anne L van Rijn, Marjon Groen, Wim G Hilhorst, Sophie Burchell, George L Hertogh, Cees M P M Pol, Margriet C Age Ageing Qualitative Paper BACKGROUND: the efficacy and outcomes of geriatric rehabilitation (GR) have previously been investigated. However, a systematic synthesis of the aspects that are important to patients regarding the quality of GR does not exist. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this scoping review was to systematically synthesise the patients’ perspective on the quality of GR. METHODS: we followed the Scoping Review framework and gathered literature including a qualitative study design from multiple databases. The inclusion criteria were: a qualitative study design; a geriatric population; that patients had participated in a geriatric rehabilitation programme and that geriatric rehabilitation was assessed by the patient. The results sections of the included studies were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: twenty articles were included in this review. The main themes identified were: (i) the need for information about the rehabilitation process, (ii) the need for telling one’s story, (iii) the need for support (physical, psychological, social and how to cope with limitations), (iv) the need for shared decision-making and autonomy, (v) the need for a stimulating rehabilitation environment and (vi) the need for rehabilitation at home. CONCLUSION: in this study, we identified the aspects that determine the quality of rehabilitation from the patient’s perspective, which may lead to a more holistic perspective on the quality of GR. Oxford University Press 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10020894/ /pubmed/36928115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad032 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Paper Lubbe, Anne L van Rijn, Marjon Groen, Wim G Hilhorst, Sophie Burchell, George L Hertogh, Cees M P M Pol, Margriet C The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review |
title | The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review |
title_full | The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review |
title_short | The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review |
title_sort | quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review |
topic | Qualitative Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lubbeannel thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT vanrijnmarjon thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT groenwimg thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT hilhorstsophie thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT burchellgeorgel thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT hertoghceesmpm thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT polmargrietc thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT lubbeannel qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT vanrijnmarjon qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT groenwimg qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT hilhorstsophie qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT burchellgeorgel qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT hertoghceesmpm qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview AT polmargrietc qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview |