Cargando…

The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: the efficacy and outcomes of geriatric rehabilitation (GR) have previously been investigated. However, a systematic synthesis of the aspects that are important to patients regarding the quality of GR does not exist. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this scoping review was to systematically synthesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lubbe, Anne L, van Rijn, Marjon, Groen, Wim G, Hilhorst, Sophie, Burchell, George L, Hertogh, Cees M P M, Pol, Margriet C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad032
_version_ 1784908360823341056
author Lubbe, Anne L
van Rijn, Marjon
Groen, Wim G
Hilhorst, Sophie
Burchell, George L
Hertogh, Cees M P M
Pol, Margriet C
author_facet Lubbe, Anne L
van Rijn, Marjon
Groen, Wim G
Hilhorst, Sophie
Burchell, George L
Hertogh, Cees M P M
Pol, Margriet C
author_sort Lubbe, Anne L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: the efficacy and outcomes of geriatric rehabilitation (GR) have previously been investigated. However, a systematic synthesis of the aspects that are important to patients regarding the quality of GR does not exist. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this scoping review was to systematically synthesise the patients’ perspective on the quality of GR. METHODS: we followed the Scoping Review framework and gathered literature including a qualitative study design from multiple databases. The inclusion criteria were: a qualitative study design; a geriatric population; that patients had participated in a geriatric rehabilitation programme and that geriatric rehabilitation was assessed by the patient. The results sections of the included studies were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: twenty articles were included in this review. The main themes identified were: (i) the need for information about the rehabilitation process, (ii) the need for telling one’s story, (iii) the need for support (physical, psychological, social and how to cope with limitations), (iv) the need for shared decision-making and autonomy, (v) the need for a stimulating rehabilitation environment and (vi) the need for rehabilitation at home. CONCLUSION: in this study, we identified the aspects that determine the quality of rehabilitation from the patient’s perspective, which may lead to a more holistic perspective on the quality of GR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10020894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100208942023-03-18 The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review Lubbe, Anne L van Rijn, Marjon Groen, Wim G Hilhorst, Sophie Burchell, George L Hertogh, Cees M P M Pol, Margriet C Age Ageing Qualitative Paper BACKGROUND: the efficacy and outcomes of geriatric rehabilitation (GR) have previously been investigated. However, a systematic synthesis of the aspects that are important to patients regarding the quality of GR does not exist. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this scoping review was to systematically synthesise the patients’ perspective on the quality of GR. METHODS: we followed the Scoping Review framework and gathered literature including a qualitative study design from multiple databases. The inclusion criteria were: a qualitative study design; a geriatric population; that patients had participated in a geriatric rehabilitation programme and that geriatric rehabilitation was assessed by the patient. The results sections of the included studies were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: twenty articles were included in this review. The main themes identified were: (i) the need for information about the rehabilitation process, (ii) the need for telling one’s story, (iii) the need for support (physical, psychological, social and how to cope with limitations), (iv) the need for shared decision-making and autonomy, (v) the need for a stimulating rehabilitation environment and (vi) the need for rehabilitation at home. CONCLUSION: in this study, we identified the aspects that determine the quality of rehabilitation from the patient’s perspective, which may lead to a more holistic perspective on the quality of GR. Oxford University Press 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10020894/ /pubmed/36928115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad032 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Qualitative Paper
Lubbe, Anne L
van Rijn, Marjon
Groen, Wim G
Hilhorst, Sophie
Burchell, George L
Hertogh, Cees M P M
Pol, Margriet C
The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review
title The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review
title_full The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review
title_fullStr The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review
title_short The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review
title_sort quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients’ perspective: a scoping review
topic Qualitative Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad032
work_keys_str_mv AT lubbeannel thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT vanrijnmarjon thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT groenwimg thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT hilhorstsophie thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT burchellgeorgel thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT hertoghceesmpm thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT polmargrietc thequalityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT lubbeannel qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT vanrijnmarjon qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT groenwimg qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT hilhorstsophie qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT burchellgeorgel qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT hertoghceesmpm qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview
AT polmargrietc qualityofgeriatricrehabilitationfromthepatientsperspectiveascopingreview