Cargando…

In vivo loss of tumorigenicity in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of ependymoma

INTRODUCTION: Ependymomas (EPN) are the third most common malignant brain cancer in children. Treatment strategies for pediatric EPN have remained unchanged over recent decades, with 10-year survival rates stagnating at just 67% for children aged 0-14 years. Moreover, a proportion of patients who su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitehouse, Jacqueline P., Hii, Hilary, Mayoh, Chelsea, Wong, Marie, Ajuyah, Pamela, Barahona, Paulette, Cui, Louise, Dholaria, Hetal, White, Christine L., Buntine, Molly K., Byrne, Jacob, Rodrigues da Silva, Keteryne, Howlett, Meegan, Girard, Emily J., Tsoli, Maria, Ziegler, David S., Dyke, Jason M., Lee, Sharon, Ekert, Paul G., Cowley, Mark J., Gottardo, Nicholas G., Endersby, Raelene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1123492
_version_ 1784908368106749952
author Whitehouse, Jacqueline P.
Hii, Hilary
Mayoh, Chelsea
Wong, Marie
Ajuyah, Pamela
Barahona, Paulette
Cui, Louise
Dholaria, Hetal
White, Christine L.
Buntine, Molly K.
Byrne, Jacob
Rodrigues da Silva, Keteryne
Howlett, Meegan
Girard, Emily J.
Tsoli, Maria
Ziegler, David S.
Dyke, Jason M.
Lee, Sharon
Ekert, Paul G.
Cowley, Mark J.
Gottardo, Nicholas G.
Endersby, Raelene
author_facet Whitehouse, Jacqueline P.
Hii, Hilary
Mayoh, Chelsea
Wong, Marie
Ajuyah, Pamela
Barahona, Paulette
Cui, Louise
Dholaria, Hetal
White, Christine L.
Buntine, Molly K.
Byrne, Jacob
Rodrigues da Silva, Keteryne
Howlett, Meegan
Girard, Emily J.
Tsoli, Maria
Ziegler, David S.
Dyke, Jason M.
Lee, Sharon
Ekert, Paul G.
Cowley, Mark J.
Gottardo, Nicholas G.
Endersby, Raelene
author_sort Whitehouse, Jacqueline P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ependymomas (EPN) are the third most common malignant brain cancer in children. Treatment strategies for pediatric EPN have remained unchanged over recent decades, with 10-year survival rates stagnating at just 67% for children aged 0-14 years. Moreover, a proportion of patients who survive treatment often suffer long-term neurological side effects as a result of therapy. It is evident that there is a need for safer, more effective treatments for pediatric EPN patients. There are ten distinct subgroups of EPN, each with their own molecular and prognostic features. To identify and facilitate the testing of new treatments for EPN, in vivo laboratory models representative of the diverse molecular subtypes are required. Here, we describe the establishment of a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model of posterior fossa A (PFA) EPN, derived from a metastatic cranial lesion. METHODS: Patient and PDOX tumors were analyzed using immunohistochemistry, DNA methylation profiling, whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Both patient and PDOX tumors classified as PFA EPN by methylation profiling, and shared similar histological features consistent with this molecular subgroup. RNA sequencing revealed that gene expression patterns were maintained across the primary and metastatic tumors, as well as the PDOX. Copy number profiling revealed gains of chromosomes 7, 8 and 19, and loss of chromosomes 2q and 6q in the PDOX and matched patient tumor. No clinically significant single nucleotide variants were identified, consistent with the low mutation rates observed in PFA EPN. Overexpression of EZHIP RNA and protein, a common feature of PFA EPN, was also observed. Despite the aggressive nature of the tumor in the patient, this PDOX was unable to be maintained past two passages in vivo. DISCUSSION: Others who have successfully developed PDOX models report some of the lowest success rates for EPN compared to other pediatric brain cancer types attempted, with loss of tumorigenicity not uncommon, highlighting the challenges of propagating these tumors in the laboratory. Here, we discuss our collective experiences with PFA EPN PDOX model generation and propose potential approaches to improve future success in establishing preclinical EPN models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10020925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100209252023-03-18 In vivo loss of tumorigenicity in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of ependymoma Whitehouse, Jacqueline P. Hii, Hilary Mayoh, Chelsea Wong, Marie Ajuyah, Pamela Barahona, Paulette Cui, Louise Dholaria, Hetal White, Christine L. Buntine, Molly K. Byrne, Jacob Rodrigues da Silva, Keteryne Howlett, Meegan Girard, Emily J. Tsoli, Maria Ziegler, David S. Dyke, Jason M. Lee, Sharon Ekert, Paul G. Cowley, Mark J. Gottardo, Nicholas G. Endersby, Raelene Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Ependymomas (EPN) are the third most common malignant brain cancer in children. Treatment strategies for pediatric EPN have remained unchanged over recent decades, with 10-year survival rates stagnating at just 67% for children aged 0-14 years. Moreover, a proportion of patients who survive treatment often suffer long-term neurological side effects as a result of therapy. It is evident that there is a need for safer, more effective treatments for pediatric EPN patients. There are ten distinct subgroups of EPN, each with their own molecular and prognostic features. To identify and facilitate the testing of new treatments for EPN, in vivo laboratory models representative of the diverse molecular subtypes are required. Here, we describe the establishment of a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model of posterior fossa A (PFA) EPN, derived from a metastatic cranial lesion. METHODS: Patient and PDOX tumors were analyzed using immunohistochemistry, DNA methylation profiling, whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Both patient and PDOX tumors classified as PFA EPN by methylation profiling, and shared similar histological features consistent with this molecular subgroup. RNA sequencing revealed that gene expression patterns were maintained across the primary and metastatic tumors, as well as the PDOX. Copy number profiling revealed gains of chromosomes 7, 8 and 19, and loss of chromosomes 2q and 6q in the PDOX and matched patient tumor. No clinically significant single nucleotide variants were identified, consistent with the low mutation rates observed in PFA EPN. Overexpression of EZHIP RNA and protein, a common feature of PFA EPN, was also observed. Despite the aggressive nature of the tumor in the patient, this PDOX was unable to be maintained past two passages in vivo. DISCUSSION: Others who have successfully developed PDOX models report some of the lowest success rates for EPN compared to other pediatric brain cancer types attempted, with loss of tumorigenicity not uncommon, highlighting the challenges of propagating these tumors in the laboratory. Here, we discuss our collective experiences with PFA EPN PDOX model generation and propose potential approaches to improve future success in establishing preclinical EPN models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10020925/ /pubmed/36937401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1123492 Text en Copyright © 2023 Whitehouse, Hii, Mayoh, Wong, Ajuyah, Barahona, Cui, Dholaria, White, Buntine, Byrne, Rodrigues da Silva, Howlett, Girard, Tsoli, Ziegler, Dyke, Lee, Ekert, Cowley, Gottardo and Endersby https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Whitehouse, Jacqueline P.
Hii, Hilary
Mayoh, Chelsea
Wong, Marie
Ajuyah, Pamela
Barahona, Paulette
Cui, Louise
Dholaria, Hetal
White, Christine L.
Buntine, Molly K.
Byrne, Jacob
Rodrigues da Silva, Keteryne
Howlett, Meegan
Girard, Emily J.
Tsoli, Maria
Ziegler, David S.
Dyke, Jason M.
Lee, Sharon
Ekert, Paul G.
Cowley, Mark J.
Gottardo, Nicholas G.
Endersby, Raelene
In vivo loss of tumorigenicity in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of ependymoma
title In vivo loss of tumorigenicity in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of ependymoma
title_full In vivo loss of tumorigenicity in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of ependymoma
title_fullStr In vivo loss of tumorigenicity in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of ependymoma
title_full_unstemmed In vivo loss of tumorigenicity in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of ependymoma
title_short In vivo loss of tumorigenicity in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of ependymoma
title_sort in vivo loss of tumorigenicity in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model of ependymoma
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36937401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1123492
work_keys_str_mv AT whitehousejacquelinep invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT hiihilary invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT mayohchelsea invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT wongmarie invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT ajuyahpamela invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT barahonapaulette invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT cuilouise invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT dholariahetal invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT whitechristinel invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT buntinemollyk invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT byrnejacob invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT rodriguesdasilvaketeryne invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT howlettmeegan invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT girardemilyj invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT tsolimaria invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT zieglerdavids invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT dykejasonm invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT leesharon invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT ekertpaulg invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT cowleymarkj invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT gottardonicholasg invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma
AT endersbyraelene invivolossoftumorigenicityinapatientderivedorthotopicxenograftmousemodelofependymoma