Cargando…

A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care

Labouring women may be subjected to physical and verbal abuse that reflects dynamics of power, described as Mistreatment of Women (MoW). This Critical Interpretive Synthesis on power and MoW consolidates current research and advances theory and practice through inter-disciplinary literature explorat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaaf, Marta, Jaffe, Maayan, Tunçalp, Özge, Freedman, Lynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36962936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000616
_version_ 1784908423844855808
author Schaaf, Marta
Jaffe, Maayan
Tunçalp, Özge
Freedman, Lynn
author_facet Schaaf, Marta
Jaffe, Maayan
Tunçalp, Özge
Freedman, Lynn
author_sort Schaaf, Marta
collection PubMed
description Labouring women may be subjected to physical and verbal abuse that reflects dynamics of power, described as Mistreatment of Women (MoW). This Critical Interpretive Synthesis on power and MoW consolidates current research and advances theory and practice through inter-disciplinary literature exploration. The review was undertaken in 3 phases. Phase 1 consisted of topic scoping; phase 2 entailed exploration of key power-related drivers emerging from the topic scoping; and phase 3 entailed data synthesis and analysis, with a particular focus on interventions. We identified 63 papers for inclusion in Phase 1. These papers utilized a variety of methods and approaches and represented a wide range of geographic regions. The power-related drivers of mistreatment in these articles span multiple levels of the social ecological model, including intrapersonal (e.g. lack of knowledge about one’s rights), interpersonal (e.g. patient-provider hierarchy), community (e.g. widespread discrimination against indigenous women), organizational (e.g. pressure to achieve performance goals), and law/policy (e.g. lack of accountability for rights violations). Most papers addressed more than one level of the social-ecological model, though a significant minority were focused just on interpersonal factors. During Phase 1, we identified priority themes relating to under-explored power-related drivers of MoW for exploration in Phase 2, including lack of conscientization and normalization of MoW; perceptions of fitness for motherhood; geopolitical and ethnopolitical projects related to fertility; and pressure to achieve quantifiable performance goals. We ultimately included 104 papers in Phase 2. The wide-ranging findings from Phase 3 (synthesis and analysis) coalesce in several key meta-themes, each with their own evidence-base for action. Consistent with the notion that research on power can point us to “drivers of the drivers,” the paper includes some intervention-relevant insights for further exploration, including as relating to broader social norms, health systems design, and the utility of multi-level strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10021192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100211922023-03-17 A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care Schaaf, Marta Jaffe, Maayan Tunçalp, Özge Freedman, Lynn PLOS Glob Public Health Review Labouring women may be subjected to physical and verbal abuse that reflects dynamics of power, described as Mistreatment of Women (MoW). This Critical Interpretive Synthesis on power and MoW consolidates current research and advances theory and practice through inter-disciplinary literature exploration. The review was undertaken in 3 phases. Phase 1 consisted of topic scoping; phase 2 entailed exploration of key power-related drivers emerging from the topic scoping; and phase 3 entailed data synthesis and analysis, with a particular focus on interventions. We identified 63 papers for inclusion in Phase 1. These papers utilized a variety of methods and approaches and represented a wide range of geographic regions. The power-related drivers of mistreatment in these articles span multiple levels of the social ecological model, including intrapersonal (e.g. lack of knowledge about one’s rights), interpersonal (e.g. patient-provider hierarchy), community (e.g. widespread discrimination against indigenous women), organizational (e.g. pressure to achieve performance goals), and law/policy (e.g. lack of accountability for rights violations). Most papers addressed more than one level of the social-ecological model, though a significant minority were focused just on interpersonal factors. During Phase 1, we identified priority themes relating to under-explored power-related drivers of MoW for exploration in Phase 2, including lack of conscientization and normalization of MoW; perceptions of fitness for motherhood; geopolitical and ethnopolitical projects related to fertility; and pressure to achieve quantifiable performance goals. We ultimately included 104 papers in Phase 2. The wide-ranging findings from Phase 3 (synthesis and analysis) coalesce in several key meta-themes, each with their own evidence-base for action. Consistent with the notion that research on power can point us to “drivers of the drivers,” the paper includes some intervention-relevant insights for further exploration, including as relating to broader social norms, health systems design, and the utility of multi-level strategies. Public Library of Science 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10021192/ /pubmed/36962936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000616 Text en © 2023 Schaaf et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Schaaf, Marta
Jaffe, Maayan
Tunçalp, Özge
Freedman, Lynn
A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care
title A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care
title_full A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care
title_fullStr A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care
title_full_unstemmed A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care
title_short A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care
title_sort critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36962936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000616
work_keys_str_mv AT schaafmarta acriticalinterpretivesynthesisofpowerandmistreatmentofwomeninmaternitycare
AT jaffemaayan acriticalinterpretivesynthesisofpowerandmistreatmentofwomeninmaternitycare
AT tuncalpozge acriticalinterpretivesynthesisofpowerandmistreatmentofwomeninmaternitycare
AT freedmanlynn acriticalinterpretivesynthesisofpowerandmistreatmentofwomeninmaternitycare
AT schaafmarta criticalinterpretivesynthesisofpowerandmistreatmentofwomeninmaternitycare
AT jaffemaayan criticalinterpretivesynthesisofpowerandmistreatmentofwomeninmaternitycare
AT tuncalpozge criticalinterpretivesynthesisofpowerandmistreatmentofwomeninmaternitycare
AT freedmanlynn criticalinterpretivesynthesisofpowerandmistreatmentofwomeninmaternitycare