Cargando…

Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma

Introduction: Maxillofacial fractures are among the commonest injuries occurring in trauma patients. Multislice computed tomography (CT) is a widely used radiological investigation that accurately reveals the number, location, and extent of the fractures as well as concomitant soft tissue injuries a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandeep Reddy, Buchipudi, Naik, Deepti, Kenkere, Deepika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938234
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35008
_version_ 1784908465267802112
author Sandeep Reddy, Buchipudi
Naik, Deepti
Kenkere, Deepika
author_facet Sandeep Reddy, Buchipudi
Naik, Deepti
Kenkere, Deepika
author_sort Sandeep Reddy, Buchipudi
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Maxillofacial fractures are among the commonest injuries occurring in trauma patients. Multislice computed tomography (CT) is a widely used radiological investigation that accurately reveals the number, location, and extent of the fractures as well as concomitant soft tissue injuries and has been found to be superior in the diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures owing to high sensitivity and specificity. This study was performed to assess the efficacy of axial, coronal, sagittal, and three-dimensional (3D) reformatted images in the detection of fractures in maxillofacial trauma. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on 49 adult patients with maxillofacial injuries undergoing multislice CT using a multidetector SiemensSOMATOM Emotion eco 16 slice CT scanner (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). CT protocol consisted of non-contrast axial 16-slice helical series beam collimation ~ 3 mm, pitch ~ 0.8 - 1, tube current ~ 270 mAs, voltage ~ 130 kV, Total exposure time ~ 18 seconds, total radiation ~ 200 mGy. Along with the axial, coronal and sagittal images were reconstructed with 0.5 mm increment. 3D volume-rendering images were also obtained. 3D images were compared with axial images, coronal and sagittal plane images. Results: The maximum number of cases was in the age group of 21-30 years with the male: female ratio being 5.12:1. The most common cause of injury was road traffic accidents (RTA). Mandible fractures were found to be the most common (20 patients, 40.8%) followed by fractures of nasal bone (18 patients, 36.7%). The incidence of frontal bone fractures was found to be the least (six patients, 12.24%). Our study found that 3D images are superior to axial in assessing the extent and degree of displacement of maxillofacial fractures in general. The maxillary sinus was found to be the most commonly fractured sinus (19 patients, 38.7%). Sphenoid sinus fractures were the least common (seen in two patients, 4.08%). CT findings correlated with the operative findings in most types of fractures. Conclusion: Multidetector CT with multiplanar and 3D reformation is highly accurate in the identification of fractures and assessing the extent and degree of displacement of fractures; hence, it is the imaging modality of choice in maxillofacial trauma. 3D images are much better for the detection of maxillofacial fractures compared to axial, coronal, or sagittal views, especially in maxilla and mandibular bone fractures. It is also found to be better at providing information on the patterns of the fracture lines and the displacement of the fracture fragments. Another added advantage of multidetector CT is that it is a non-invasive technique with good accuracy and a short scan time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10021354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100213542023-03-18 Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma Sandeep Reddy, Buchipudi Naik, Deepti Kenkere, Deepika Cureus Emergency Medicine Introduction: Maxillofacial fractures are among the commonest injuries occurring in trauma patients. Multislice computed tomography (CT) is a widely used radiological investigation that accurately reveals the number, location, and extent of the fractures as well as concomitant soft tissue injuries and has been found to be superior in the diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures owing to high sensitivity and specificity. This study was performed to assess the efficacy of axial, coronal, sagittal, and three-dimensional (3D) reformatted images in the detection of fractures in maxillofacial trauma. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on 49 adult patients with maxillofacial injuries undergoing multislice CT using a multidetector SiemensSOMATOM Emotion eco 16 slice CT scanner (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). CT protocol consisted of non-contrast axial 16-slice helical series beam collimation ~ 3 mm, pitch ~ 0.8 - 1, tube current ~ 270 mAs, voltage ~ 130 kV, Total exposure time ~ 18 seconds, total radiation ~ 200 mGy. Along with the axial, coronal and sagittal images were reconstructed with 0.5 mm increment. 3D volume-rendering images were also obtained. 3D images were compared with axial images, coronal and sagittal plane images. Results: The maximum number of cases was in the age group of 21-30 years with the male: female ratio being 5.12:1. The most common cause of injury was road traffic accidents (RTA). Mandible fractures were found to be the most common (20 patients, 40.8%) followed by fractures of nasal bone (18 patients, 36.7%). The incidence of frontal bone fractures was found to be the least (six patients, 12.24%). Our study found that 3D images are superior to axial in assessing the extent and degree of displacement of maxillofacial fractures in general. The maxillary sinus was found to be the most commonly fractured sinus (19 patients, 38.7%). Sphenoid sinus fractures were the least common (seen in two patients, 4.08%). CT findings correlated with the operative findings in most types of fractures. Conclusion: Multidetector CT with multiplanar and 3D reformation is highly accurate in the identification of fractures and assessing the extent and degree of displacement of fractures; hence, it is the imaging modality of choice in maxillofacial trauma. 3D images are much better for the detection of maxillofacial fractures compared to axial, coronal, or sagittal views, especially in maxilla and mandibular bone fractures. It is also found to be better at providing information on the patterns of the fracture lines and the displacement of the fracture fragments. Another added advantage of multidetector CT is that it is a non-invasive technique with good accuracy and a short scan time. Cureus 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10021354/ /pubmed/36938234 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35008 Text en Copyright © 2023, Sandeep Reddy et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Sandeep Reddy, Buchipudi
Naik, Deepti
Kenkere, Deepika
Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma
title Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma
title_full Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma
title_fullStr Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma
title_full_unstemmed Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma
title_short Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma
title_sort role of multidetector computed tomography in the evaluation of maxillofacial trauma
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938234
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35008
work_keys_str_mv AT sandeepreddybuchipudi roleofmultidetectorcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofmaxillofacialtrauma
AT naikdeepti roleofmultidetectorcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofmaxillofacialtrauma
AT kenkeredeepika roleofmultidetectorcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofmaxillofacialtrauma