Cargando…
Region-specific laboratory reference intervals are important: A systematic review of the data from Africa
Region-specific laboratory reference intervals (RIs) are important for clinical trials and these data are often sparse in priority areas for research, including Africa. We reviewed data on RIs from Africa to identify gaps in the literature with a systematic review of PubMed for RI studies from Afric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36962599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000783 |
_version_ | 1784908495522365440 |
---|---|
author | Price, Matt A. Fast, Patricia E. Mshai, Mercy Lambrick, Maureen Machira, Yvonne Wangũi Gieber, Lisa Chetty, Paramesh Muturi-Kioi, Vincent |
author_facet | Price, Matt A. Fast, Patricia E. Mshai, Mercy Lambrick, Maureen Machira, Yvonne Wangũi Gieber, Lisa Chetty, Paramesh Muturi-Kioi, Vincent |
author_sort | Price, Matt A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Region-specific laboratory reference intervals (RIs) are important for clinical trials and these data are often sparse in priority areas for research, including Africa. We reviewed data on RIs from Africa to identify gaps in the literature with a systematic review of PubMed for RI studies from Africa published ≥2010. Search focus included clinical analytic chemistry, hematology, immunological parameters and RIs. Data from adults, adolescents, children, pregnant women, and the elderly were included. We excluded manuscripts reporting data from persons with conditions that might preclude clinical trial participation in studies enrolling healthy volunteers. Of 179 identified manuscripts, 80 were included in this review, covering 20 countries with the largest number of studies in Ethiopia (n = 23, 29%). Most studies considered healthy, nonpregnant adults (n = 55, 69%). Nine (11%) studies included pregnant women, 13 (16%) included adolescents and 22 (28%) included children. Recruitment, screening, enrollment procedures and definition of age strata varied across studies. The most common type of RIs reported were hematology (66, 83%); 14 studies (18%) included flow cytometry and/or T cell counts. Other common tests or panels included liver function assays (32, 40%), renal function assays (30, 38%), lipid chemistries (17, 21%) and serum electrolytes (17, 21%). The number of parameters characterized ranged from only one (three studies characterized either CD4+ counts, D-dimer, or hemoglobin), to as many as 40. Statistical methods for calculating RIs varied. 56 (70%) studies compared their results to international RI databases. Though most presented their data side-by-side with international data with little accompanying analysis, nearly all reported deviation from comparator RI data, sometimes with half or more of otherwise healthy participants having an “out of range” result. We found there is limited local RI data available in sub-Saharan Africa. Studies to fill this gap are warranted, including efforts to standardize statistical methods to derive RIs, methods to compare with other RIs, and improve representative participant selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10021479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100214792023-03-17 Region-specific laboratory reference intervals are important: A systematic review of the data from Africa Price, Matt A. Fast, Patricia E. Mshai, Mercy Lambrick, Maureen Machira, Yvonne Wangũi Gieber, Lisa Chetty, Paramesh Muturi-Kioi, Vincent PLOS Glob Public Health Research Article Region-specific laboratory reference intervals (RIs) are important for clinical trials and these data are often sparse in priority areas for research, including Africa. We reviewed data on RIs from Africa to identify gaps in the literature with a systematic review of PubMed for RI studies from Africa published ≥2010. Search focus included clinical analytic chemistry, hematology, immunological parameters and RIs. Data from adults, adolescents, children, pregnant women, and the elderly were included. We excluded manuscripts reporting data from persons with conditions that might preclude clinical trial participation in studies enrolling healthy volunteers. Of 179 identified manuscripts, 80 were included in this review, covering 20 countries with the largest number of studies in Ethiopia (n = 23, 29%). Most studies considered healthy, nonpregnant adults (n = 55, 69%). Nine (11%) studies included pregnant women, 13 (16%) included adolescents and 22 (28%) included children. Recruitment, screening, enrollment procedures and definition of age strata varied across studies. The most common type of RIs reported were hematology (66, 83%); 14 studies (18%) included flow cytometry and/or T cell counts. Other common tests or panels included liver function assays (32, 40%), renal function assays (30, 38%), lipid chemistries (17, 21%) and serum electrolytes (17, 21%). The number of parameters characterized ranged from only one (three studies characterized either CD4+ counts, D-dimer, or hemoglobin), to as many as 40. Statistical methods for calculating RIs varied. 56 (70%) studies compared their results to international RI databases. Though most presented their data side-by-side with international data with little accompanying analysis, nearly all reported deviation from comparator RI data, sometimes with half or more of otherwise healthy participants having an “out of range” result. We found there is limited local RI data available in sub-Saharan Africa. Studies to fill this gap are warranted, including efforts to standardize statistical methods to derive RIs, methods to compare with other RIs, and improve representative participant selection. Public Library of Science 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10021479/ /pubmed/36962599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000783 Text en © 2022 Price et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Price, Matt A. Fast, Patricia E. Mshai, Mercy Lambrick, Maureen Machira, Yvonne Wangũi Gieber, Lisa Chetty, Paramesh Muturi-Kioi, Vincent Region-specific laboratory reference intervals are important: A systematic review of the data from Africa |
title | Region-specific laboratory reference intervals are important: A systematic review of the data from Africa |
title_full | Region-specific laboratory reference intervals are important: A systematic review of the data from Africa |
title_fullStr | Region-specific laboratory reference intervals are important: A systematic review of the data from Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Region-specific laboratory reference intervals are important: A systematic review of the data from Africa |
title_short | Region-specific laboratory reference intervals are important: A systematic review of the data from Africa |
title_sort | region-specific laboratory reference intervals are important: a systematic review of the data from africa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10021479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36962599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pricematta regionspecificlaboratoryreferenceintervalsareimportantasystematicreviewofthedatafromafrica AT fastpatriciae regionspecificlaboratoryreferenceintervalsareimportantasystematicreviewofthedatafromafrica AT mshaimercy regionspecificlaboratoryreferenceintervalsareimportantasystematicreviewofthedatafromafrica AT lambrickmaureen regionspecificlaboratoryreferenceintervalsareimportantasystematicreviewofthedatafromafrica AT machirayvonnewangui regionspecificlaboratoryreferenceintervalsareimportantasystematicreviewofthedatafromafrica AT gieberlisa regionspecificlaboratoryreferenceintervalsareimportantasystematicreviewofthedatafromafrica AT chettyparamesh regionspecificlaboratoryreferenceintervalsareimportantasystematicreviewofthedatafromafrica AT muturikioivincent regionspecificlaboratoryreferenceintervalsareimportantasystematicreviewofthedatafromafrica |